Jump to content
Science Forums

Domes Dei And Malthus


petrushkagoogol
 Share

Recommended Posts

Food increases in arithmetic progression 1,2,4,8 .....

Population increases in geometric progression 1,2,4,16 .....

Mankind is facing a resource crunch involving non-renewable energy resources.

Will this bring about a "domes dei" type scenario with ramifications akin to it's divinely inspired namesake ? (through conflict for resources).  :irked: 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Historically food has kept pace with population. If it had not, mankind--and quite frankly, every species--would have died out immediately.

 

And you may have heard of this thing "renewable resources"...

 

 

And the sand-castle virtues are all swept away, in the tidal destruction the moral melee, :phones:
Buffy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Historically food has kept pace with population. If it had not, mankind--and quite frankly, every species--would have died out immediately.

 

And you may have heard of this thing "renewable resources"...

 

 

And the sand-castle virtues are all swept away, in the tidal destruction the moral melee, :phones:
Buffy

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Our food problem is not one of production, but one of economics and politics.

 

What I know of food production as a producer in the dairy industry, is that in our own herd, we have doubled production per cow since my parents started in 1959, and we use less labor, electricity, and fuel to maintain that higher level of production.  

 

Over that same time period, the processing and retailing of dairy has become greatly consolidated, so we producers have fewer options for marketing our product, and consumers have fewer options as to where to purchase their food, especially low income consumers.

 

As the markets consolidated, processing plants were closed, so in some areas of the U.S.A. there just is not enough processing capacity for the volume of milk being produced, so a not insignificant amount ends up being applied to land as fertilizer.

 

Of course in the marketplace, the processors and retailers want to move the food to markets where they will make the most profit.  

 

Do not forget that much starvation occurs in locations that face political instability and violence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Our food problem is not one of production, but one of economics and politics.

 

....Over that same time period, the processing and retailing of dairy has become greatly consolidated, so we producers have fewer options for marketing our product, and consumers have fewer options as to where to purchase their food, especially low income consumers.

 

As the markets consolidated, processing plants were closed, so in some areas of the U.S.A. there just is not enough processing capacity for the volume of milk being produced, so a not insignificant amount ends up being applied to land as fertilizer.

 

Of course in the marketplace, the processors and retailers want to move the food to markets where they will make the most profit.  

 

Thank you for providing an excellent example of the problems that occur when government (the politics) abdicates its role of setting market rules that ensure competitive and efficient markets (the economics) by non-enforcement of anti-trust laws and letting markets consolidate to the point where the few remaining entrants can limit themselves only to the most profitable market segments while amassing the market power to keep new entrants from even serving the market segments that they no longer target.

 

A reminder that markets with no rules devolve into inefficient oligopolies where consumers are the losers, and without government regulation you have no rules.

 

 

We draw the line against misconduct, not against wealth, :phones:

Buffy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you for providing an excellent example of the problems that occur when government (the politics) abdicates its role of setting market rules that ensure competitive and efficient markets (the economics) by non-enforcement of anti-trust laws and letting markets consolidate to the point where the few remaining entrants can limit themselves only to the most profitable market segments while amassing the market power to keep new entrants from even serving the market segments that they no longer target.

 

A reminder that markets with no rules devolve into inefficient oligopolies  / monopolies  where consumers are the losers, and without government regulation you have no rules.

 

 

We draw the line against misconduct, not against wealth, :phones:

Buffy

 

My opinion .....  :sherlock:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My opinion .....  :sherlock:

 

Monopolies are rare because they're much more obvious than oligopolies and it makes you a target even in situations where there is corporate capture of the legal system. In fact, oligopolies provide monopolistic power to the few entrants in the market who then engage in "co-opetition" wherein practices such as price fixing can be made to occur even without explicit collusion.

 

 

You are not entitled to your opinion. You are entitled to your informed opinion. No one is entitled to be ignorant, :phones:

Buffy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Monopolies are rare because they're much more obvious than oligopolies and it makes you a target even in situations where there is corporate capture of the legal system. In fact, oligopolies provide monopolistic power to the few entrants in the market who then engage in "co-opetition" wherein practices such as price fixing can be made to occur even without explicit collusion.

 

 

You are not entitled to your opinion. You are entitled to your informed opinion. No one is entitled to be ignorant, :phones:

Buffy

Exactly!

 

I have seen smaller dairy processors that were successful get bought out by larger companies that keep the plant running and continue the brand name for a while, then replace the brand name with their own, and finally shut down the purchased plant, and bring in the milk from farther away.  Since the producers are the ones who pay the freight, and the consumers have accepted the new brand, there is no incentive for them to keep the local plant running.

 

Whenever the state milk commission holds public hearings, the processing company management get front row seating, and seem quite chummy with each other.  Perhaps that is why the United States pricing structure grants the processors a "make allowance" when they set the prices for the marketing orders.

 

I would love to be able to sell fresh milk to my neighbors, but the cost of complying with regulations and the cost of liability insurance leaves little room for profit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Food increases in arithmetic progression 1,2,4,8 .....
Population increases in geometric progression 1,2,4,16 .....

 

Citation needed.  I haven't found that food increases at all over time, instead it decreases as it spoils.  If you are meaning to claim that our ability to produce food increases arithmetically, then I would ask why you believe our food to not be a conglomeration of populations?

 

Fundamentally, while adequate food production for a growing human population is an important consideration, your opening assertion is an entire fabrication.

 

Malthusian predictions have consistently been incorrect.  Famine in human populations is almost always due to political conflict rather than technological failings.

 

Regardless, your opening claim is a fairy tale.

Edited by JMJones0424
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Citation needed.  I haven't found that food increases at all over time, instead it decreases as it spoils.  If you are meaning to claim that our ability to produce food increases arithmetically, then I would ask why you believe our food to not be a conglomeration of populations?

....

Regardless, your opening claim is a fairy tale.

 

The claim of arithmetic progression appears to be based solely on faith, which I've assumed based on the fact that the original poster placed it in the Theology Forum.

 

So, yes, "fairy tale" is unfortunately quite accurate.

 

 

General note: we're a little more tolerant in the Theology forum of "bending the rules" but testing the limits is generally considered to be a bad idea.

 

 

Don't look for it, Taylor. You may not like what you find, :phones:

Buffy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Food growth as an Arithmetic Progression is a postulate of the Malthusian Theory of Population .....

 

...and Malthus has been proven to be an idiot...and thus anyone who quotes him without some sort of disclaimer or caveat is considered...well, you get the picture....

 

 

We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid, :phones:
Buffy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

 

Monopolies are rare because they're much more obvious than oligopolies and it makes you a target even in situations where there is corporate capture of the legal system. In fact, oligopolies provide monopolistic power to the few entrants in the market who then engage in "co-opetition" wherein practices such as price fixing can be made to occur even without explicit collusion.

 

 

I've heard this bull before, Everybody that does too much coke spews out like this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've heard this bull before, Everybody that does too much coke spews out like this.

 

Care to actually provide an actual logical argument? Or are you simply one of those willfully ignorant folk who insists you don't "believe in" economics?

 

 

Really don't mind if you sit this one out, :phones:

Buffy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've heard this bull before, Everybody that does too much coke spews out like this.

As someone with bovine experience, I can tell you that all the bull you need fits in a 1/4 cc straw, and the post to which you refer has not even that amount.

 

The core lesson I took away from the board game Monopoly that I played with my siblings in childhood was that once someone achieves a monopoly, it's game over.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Or are you simply one of those willfully ignorant folk

I've heard this condescending crap before. When someone corrects you. you misrepresent them and bury them. You can't stand the fqct that you don't know what you are talking about. every ignorant person says the same things that you say, and throws the same fit when people don't agree with them.

you just want people to agree with you, you can't stand real revue.

Edited by malform11
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...