Guadalupe Posted January 30, 2012 Report Share Posted January 30, 2012 Below is my latest work in the field of physics. I updated Sir Isaac Newton’s 2nd Law of Motion by replacing force “F” with energy “E”. I call my latest discovery, "Second Law of Motion". Second Law of Motion Second Law of Motion states: The acceleration of a body is parallel and directly proportional to the amount of energy applied. Meaning that energy is the origin by which all things are set in motion. My mathematical formula for the Second Law of Motion is as follows: “Energy equals mass times acceleration or E=ma.” Copyright © 2012 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joekgamer Posted January 31, 2012 Report Share Posted January 31, 2012 Two questions:1) What is the basis for this? 2) How do you reconcile this with E=mc^2? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sigurdV Posted January 31, 2012 Report Share Posted January 31, 2012 Aha! So a=c^2? Seems testable. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joekgamer Posted February 1, 2012 Report Share Posted February 1, 2012 Given that a=c^2a = m/s^2c^2 = m^2/s^2m/s^2 =/= m^2/s^2 Thus, a =/= c^2, as it would create a contradiction, as shown above. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guadalupe Posted February 4, 2012 Author Report Share Posted February 4, 2012 Energy is the “main” reason as to why a change occurs on the objects velocity or direction. Depending on the amount of energy will increase or decreases an objects velocity or change its direction. Sir Isaac Newton never knew about the term “energy” in the modern sense. If he did, thing would have been a lot different today. Remember, things change with time and with new discoveries. If we don't update with this new discoveries, we’ll still be working with primitive and out dated tools. :cup: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lawcat Posted February 4, 2012 Report Share Posted February 4, 2012 ROFLCOPTER Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sigurdV Posted February 7, 2012 Report Share Posted February 7, 2012 Given that a=c^2a = m/s^2c^2 = m^2/s^2m/s^2 =/= m^2/s^2 Thus, a =/= c^2, as it would create a contradiction, as shown above. Amazing... D#proving a theory! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sigurdV Posted February 7, 2012 Report Share Posted February 7, 2012 Sir Isaac Newton never knew about the term “energy” in the modern sense. :cup: Newton suspected forces were energetic definitely not lethargic. Hic! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guadalupe Posted February 11, 2012 Author Report Share Posted February 11, 2012 Two questions:1) What is the basis for this? 2) How do you reconcile this with E=mc^2? E=mc^2 has no acceleration. F or E=ma has acceleration. So, as you can see, there is no reconciliation. :cup: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guadalupe Posted February 11, 2012 Author Report Share Posted February 11, 2012 Newton suspected forces were energetic definitely not lethargic. Hic! In Sir Isaac Newton’s time, there was only "force" and something called, “vis viva”. The term “energy” in the modern sense didn’t come about for some years later after his death. It never was a question of lethargic. :cup: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.