Jump to content
Science Forums

What is a Scientific Philosophy


Rade

Recommended Posts

I will define "scientific philosophy" as "to think as if you know". (let us then define knowledge as "to have a mental grasp of the fact(s) of reality" and reality as "that which exists"). All mental grasps are understood with a degree of uncertainty. The argument ultimately derives from the axiom "existence exists".

 

Thus, to hold a scientific philosophy is to think as if you have an uncertain understanding of the fact(s) of that which exists. Conversely, to hold a non-scientific philosophy is to think as if you do NOT have an uncertain understanding of the fact(s) of that which exists.

 

Any comments ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thus, to hold a scientific philosophy is to think as if you have an uncertain understanding of the fact(s) of that which exists.

This is simply a restatement of your assumptions. It does not explain why you use the word "scientific" to decribe this philosophy.

 

Conversely, to hold a non-scientific philosophy is to think as if you do NOT have an uncertain understanding of the fact(s) of that which exists.

This is a double negative. Did you mean:

 

a) "to hold a non-scientific philosophy is to think as if you have a certain understanding of the fact(s) of that which exists" or...

 

:naughty: "to hold a non-scientific philosophy is to think as if you have an uncertain understanding of the fact(s) of that which does not exist" or...

 

c) "to hold a non-scientific philosophy is to think as if you do NOT have a certain understanding of the fact(s) of that which does not exist", or what??? :hihi:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is simply a restatement of your assumptions. It does not explain why you use the word "scientific" to describe this philosophy.

Did you mean:

a) "to hold a non-scientific philosophy is to think as if you have a certain understanding of the fact(s) of that which exists"

Thanks for comments. Yes, I did not define "science". Science means "to know", philosophy means "to think".

 

As to your second comment, true, it is a negative proposition, I like best as replacement your (a) = "to hold a non-scientific philosophy is to think as if you have a certain understanding of the fact(s) of that which exists"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...