Garry Denke Posted February 25, 2005 Report Share Posted February 25, 2005 Stonehenge Birth Canal Baby Mouth Dentist Garry Denke (1622-1699) proposed that Stonehenge may actually be modeled after a tooth-filled mouth. There were three phases in the completion of Stonehenge, and the Dentist felt that each phase was modeled after a mouth showing ancient knowledge of evolution. He felt that the first phase was modeled after fish teeth, the second phase after a Great White, and the third phase after a baby's mouth. In websites dedicated to the Dentist's beliefs, pictures are included which show similarities between the hard stone and soft stone locations. Many geologists focus on the idea that Stonehenge may be modeled after the birth canal and mouth of a baby. They even feel that there is an 'altar' of evidence of a tongue in a mouth. These geologists have 'mapped out' just how the idea of Stonehenge, a birth canal and a baby's mouth are similar, comparing certain stones with certain teeth. Many doctors agree that Stonehenge is an ancient statement of humanity, a symbol of female fertility, and that there are similarities between the formation of the rocks, a birth canal and a baby's mouth. Stonehenge has a mysterious and fascinating history. The rocks used at Stonehenge are between 24 and 340 million years old, depending on the rock. A variety of stones were used in the creation of Stonehenge, including both igneous and sedimentary rocks. Whatever the case, Great White hard or birth canal baby mouth soft, Stonehenge is truly a wonder. It may be a long time before we can understand what its creator was truly trying to convey. Until then, let us simply appreciate its artistic form and the astonishing amount of 'labor' that went into it. http://images.google.com/images?q=Stonehenge%20Teeth&hl=en&lr=&sa=N&tab=wi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fishteacher73 Posted February 25, 2005 Report Share Posted February 25, 2005 It seems a bit streached to say a culture that had no written record, and used stone-age tools understood evolution. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Queso Posted February 25, 2005 Report Share Posted February 25, 2005 It seems to fit, but I think it fits more into a coincidence. Stonehenge and it's eerie presence, to me, seems just like a place of spiritual gathering. I heard the stones were somehow dragged hundreds of miles to the actual place where stonehenge was assembled...that itself is pretty amazing. Maybe they felt the ground that stomehenge lies on was "holy" or something, why else would they drag stones for hundreds of miles....actually, HOW? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Garry Denke Posted February 25, 2005 Author Report Share Posted February 25, 2005 It seems a bit streached to say a culture that had no written record, and used stone-age tools understood evolution.Yes, agreed Fishteacher, nevertheless, the stonehenge phase 1>2>3conodont>shark>human sequence is in the correct evolutionary order. Best wishes! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tormod Posted February 25, 2005 Report Share Posted February 25, 2005 Yes, agreed Fishteacher, nevertheless, the stonehenge phase 1>2>3conodont>shark>human sequence is in the correct evolutionary order. Yes, of course it is. Or else the whole idea would be ridiculous, no? Why don't we just twist the argument around and say that stonehenge proves evolution since it shows that people understood the theory already in the stone age. Sorry...things are not so simple. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Turtle Posted February 26, 2005 Report Share Posted February 26, 2005 ___There is just up the Columbia River Gorge from me, a complete scale replica (1/2 maybe?) of Stonehenge. A fascinating topic, once I dared breach your inititial title.:cup: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Garry Denke Posted February 27, 2005 Author Report Share Posted February 27, 2005 Yes, of course it is. Or else the whole idea would be ridiculous, no? Why don't we just twist the argument around and say that stonehenge proves evolution since it shows that people understood the theory already in the stone age. Sorry...things are not so simple.Well, that one to the trash Tormod, back to the drawing board, here's some applied geophysics... http://www.hypography.com/scienceforums/showthread.php?t=1779 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.