Jump to content
Science Forums

7 Reasons To Abandon Quantum Mechanics-And Embrace This New Theory


andrewgray
 Share

Recommended Posts

Write4u,

Quote

Ok, I accept your expertise in the field.

Wow.  You realize that "my expertise" realizes that the low intensity double slit experiment involves WAVES ONLY at the detector's threshold intensity.  "No quantum anything".

 

Quote

IMO, that is a misleading analogy. It has nothing to do with decibels.  It is quite possible to separate worm crawling waves from jackhammer waves.

Write4u,

It is only possible to detect a tiny background wave from behind a gigantic foreground wave if

1) YOU generate the gigantic foreground wave and

2) YOU know the gigantic foreground wave exactly down to the tiny wave's scale! 

Then and only then can you "subtract out the jackhammers" and recover the "worm crawling".  A tiny background wave behind a noisy gigantic foreground wave is unrecoverable if they have similar frequencies!

WIth the CMB, obviously we did not generate the gigantic Milky Way microwave foreground (the "jackhammers"), and obviously no one really knows EXACTLY what it is, so...  the tiny microwave background (the "worm crawling") is unrecoverable.  Duh.

Andrew Ancel Gray

 

Edited by andrewgray
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Quote

An experiment caught a quantum system in the middle of a jump...

Write4u,

By now, you could have realized that there are no quantum jumps in atoms.  About 100 years ago, Niels Bohr made up this "quantum jump" mythology with "fauxton emission" mythology to go along with it!  Now let us think about these myths for a minute.  The atom emits well-formed sinusoidal light waves that are indeed "well-formed"!   Just imagine a chaotic transition between two orbitals of an atom and try to imagine "well-formed" EM waves being generated during this chaotic transition between orbitals.  You cannot!  "Quantum jumps" with sinusoidal EM emissions are the dumbest thing since epicycles!

In reality, the atomic frequencies seen in atomic spectra are orbital frequencies THAT EXIST IN THE ATOM.  These EXISTING frequencies are thermally disturbed and then radiate "well-formed" sinusoidal EM waves. Now this makes sense!  The main thing early 1900s physicists could not figure out was "how an electron could orbit a nucleus without radiating ALL THE TIME".  It took this New Wisdom, Intermittent Electron Theory to explain that!  The electron and the nucleus pulsate in such a way that the electron is OFF when it is accelerated around in the orbit!

So you physicists have been stuck with all this dumb, makes-no-sense, "quantum jump" theory for over 100 years!  Ouch, that is dumb.

Give it up!

Andrew Ancel Gray   

And you electrical engineers out there reading this forum...!!  How could you guys let physicist go down such a dumb path for 100 years without saying anything???   This quantum dumbness is partially on you guys too!  Have you guys ever seen a radio wave fauxton??  There goes one!

 

Edited by andrewgray
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Quote

Does Quantum Entanglement Allow for Faster-Than-Light Communications?

Aghmen,

This forum really needs to be entitled:

Quote

"Andrew Gray explains away stupid modern physics claims!"

Anyway, we are talking about Alain-Aspect-style "entangled fauxton" polarization experiments.  We covered this subject in previous posts, but it is worthwhile to go over it again!

 

So Aghmen, we use an important principle in science:

1.  You make an assumption.

2. You test the assumption with experiment.

3. Suppose you get a contradiction.

4. Then you throw out your initial assumption...   You do not keep your contradiction!

 

In short, if you get a experimental contradiction, you throw out your assumption, YOU DO NOT KEEP YOUR CONTRADICTION!   This principle applies to many experiments in modern physics, especially the entanglement myth experiment!  Here is the entanglement myth as it applies to the above:

 

1.  Assumption:  assume two fauxtons emerge from a system, "entangled".

2.  Do an Alain-Aspect-style experiment with two polarizers and then use Bell's inequality to conclude that there is NO LOCAL REALITY and further conclude FASTER-THAN-LIGHT communication!

3.  Contradiction!

4.  SO THROW OUT YOUR INITIAL ASSUMPTION THAT THERE EXISTS TWO "FAUXTONS"!

 

Aghmen, it is just that simple.  All those contradictions and myths that you see in experiments like these are resolved by simply throwing out Einstein's assumption about the existence of "fauxtons!"   There are no fauxtons!

 

Better get used to it.  It is coming.

 

Edited by andrewgray
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

So now that is seems quiet on this thread, it is time to lay down the

 

Bremsstrahlung Cutoff Killer Experiment!

 

So we start with an x-ray tube:

XRayTube4.png

We see an electron beam emitted by the cathode, striking the tungsten anode!  The electrons go bouncing around inside the tungsten, being accelerated back and forth so fast that they emit x-ray waves!  Like this:

bremsstrahlung6.png

But there is an x-ray frequency limit!  If we plot x-ray intensity vs. x-ray frequency, there is a cutoff frequency that depends on electron beam energy that looks like this:XRaySpectrum.bmp

So, for example, the cutoff frequency for 25 KeV electrons is 6 exahertz!  And this cutoff frequency does not change even if you make the anode material denser so the electrons have faster collisions!  So look at the x-ray tube again:

XRayTube4.png

In the lower right corner we have magnified the electron beam.  We show the electrons pulsing ON and OFF according to De Broglie!  And as they gain more and more energy, they pulsate faster and faster!  Just like we show in the inset!  How fast do they pulsate according to De Broglie when they get to the tungsten anode???  Well... we start with De Broglie's formula:

debroglie.png

Notice that De Broglie's formula gives an extra factor of 2 that we are not used to!  This says that for linear acceleration, the electron's pulsation frequency is twice its Kinetic Energy over Planck's constant (2E/h)!  But if the electron is pulsating at this De Broglie frequency while generating x-ray waves, it naturally has a Nyquist Frequency Limit for its emitted x-ray waves!  This Nyquist Limit is ½ the electron's  pulsation frequency or, as expected:

xraylimit.png 

Folks, this x-ray cutoff frequency HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH FAUXTONS!  It simply comes from the Nyquist Frequency Limit for a pulsating electron that is getting accelerated back and forth and radiating!  NO FAUXTONS!

And... if you are not familiar with Nyquist Frequency Limits, watch this video!!!  :

 

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1lAdUM62V3ALN_cxKOHUNdYnQDh5DZDZu/view?usp=sharing

 

Now we are ready for the Bremsstrahlung Cutoff Killer Experiment!

 

Andrew Ancel Gray

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As we saw in the previous message, the electron pulsates according to De Broglie for the linear acceleration in an x-ray tube:

debroglie.png

Then, when the pulsating electron strikes the tungsten anode, its EM emissions are limited by a Nyquist Frequency Limit that is half the electron pulsation frequency!

xraylimit.png

Again, this has nothing to do with "fauxtons"!  But we are very sure that this DeBroglie/Nyquist relation is true for linear accelerations, but what about circular accelerations?  Does the De Broglie formula remain true for an electron accelerated by a cyclotron?  Probably NOT!  We need to find out!  In the linear x-ray tube, the electron is obviously accelerated in the same direction for the whole time!  But in a cyclotron, the electron is accelerated linearly one way, then centripetally accelerated, then linearly accelerated the other way (over and over again!).  This is different and could result in a different electron pulsation frequency!    If a 25 KeV linearly-accelerated-electron pulsates differently than a 25 KeV cyclotron-accelerated-electron, then guess what???   Their x-ray frequency limits will be different when they slam into the tungsten, disproving QM (Quantum Mythology!)  QM says that the x-ray frequency limit will be the same for these two cases.  If they are different, then we can get rid of QM!

So one of you "soon-to-be-not-so-dumb" young physicists out there needs to do the Bremsstahlung Cutoff Killer Experiment!

The experimental setup would be like this:

bremsstrahlung7.gif

 

Do this experiment with the electron cyclotron and find the x-ray cutoff frequency.   Compare this frequency with E/h !!!  It could be different!  If it is, goodbye QM!

Andrew Ancel Gray

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

It is time to continue with experimental proof that we do not have QM (Quantum Mythology), and we DO have New Wisdom Unifies Physics!  So which Quantum Mythology are we going to talk about next???  Well,  this one:  (!!!)

AtomicEnergyLevelMythology.png

 

Atomic Energy Level Mythology!  The mythology above is easy to see now that we know what is REALLY going on in the atom!  You see, Bohr and Einstein just made up this "fauxton-emission-during-level-transition" mythology.  Bohr saw that the Balmer Formula was a subtraction of two "1 over n²" terms, and Einstein had already made up "fauxtons".  So Bohr put Einstein's mythological "fauxtons" together with his mythological "energy levels" and pretended a sinusoidal EM "fauxton" could be emitted while a chaotic electron transition occurred between levels.  What nonsense!

In reality, these EM frequencies exist in the hydrogen atom.  These frequencies exist in the atom because the electrons are orbiting at these frequencies!  Why don't they radiate continuously?  (If you do not know already, then watch these videos!)

https://drive.google...iew?usp=sharing

https://drive.google...iew?usp=sharing

In the Bohr diagram above, the Lyman (1,7) "jump" corresponds to the electron almost being ejected from the hydrogen atom.  And indeed, in Bohr's scenario, the Lyman (1,∞) "jump" corresponds to ionization.  The Lyman (1,∞) "drop" would correspond to the chaotic capture of a free electron by a proton.  Just think about this for a moment.  A free electron is chaotically captured by a proton and while doing so it emits only regular sinusoidal UV radiation of just one frequency?  Nonsense! Just plain nonsense!  The electron would emit slow, then faster and faster frequencies until it settled into its final orbit!  You might as well face the logic!  Bohr and Einstein's logic is QM (Quantum Mythology)!

 

Sinusoidal EM waves ARE NOT emitted during chaotic transitions!  They are emitted when orbitals with these orbital frequencies are thermally disturbed, causing them to radiate their resonant frequency!  So the hydrogen diagram changes to this:

orbitals2B.gif

So instead of the Lyman (1,∞) frequency corresponding to the electron's [ejection/capture] [to/from] about 50Å (!), the Lyman (1,∞) frequency actually corresponds to the most tightly bound electron orbital at about .8Å.  This inner electron orbits at this frequency without radiating and only emits at this Lyman frequency when it is thermally disturbed!  We finally know what is really going on in the atom so we can devise experiments to prove it!

So Next!    The Energy Level Killer Experiments!

 

Andrew Ancel Gray

Edited by andrewgray
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So the first Energy Level Killer Experiment is the

Lyman Killer Experiment!

According to QM (Quantum Mythology), the Lyman (1,∞) ultra-violet frequency corresponds to the complete ionization of the hydrogen atom.   We will show by experiment that this is NOT true.  First we must know this: (!)

LymanAbsorptionB.png

(Fundamentals of Modern Physics, Eisberg, p 113)  Only the Lyman series shows up in the absorption spectrum of hydrogen at room temperature!  This means that the Lyman (1,∞) frequency shows up in the hydrogen absorption spectrum. What this means is that the hydrogen absorbs the Lyman (1,∞) frequency just like it absorbs the Lyman (1,2), Lyman (1,3), Lyman (1,4)... frequencies.  We want to let hydrogen gas at room temperature absorb Lyman (1,∞) UV light and see if hydrogen is actually ionized as QM claims.  According to QM if we illuminate hydrogen with (1,∞) UV light, then electrons will be freed from their hydrogen nucleus and can cause an electric current through the hydrogen gas when a small voltage is applied!   We claim that the Lyman (1,∞) UV light is NOT the special ionizing frequency!   The experimental setup is as follows!

Andrew Ancel Gray

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Lyman Killer Experiment!

We want to set up an experiment that shines the Lyman (1,∞) light into hydrogen vapor and show that it does NOT actually ionize hydrogen as QM claims it does.  The Lyman (1,∞) frequency is actually the tightest electron orbital frequency possible for hydrogen and it actually exists in the hydrogen atom as shown below: 

Lyman1_2B.png

The Lyman(1,∞) frequency does NOT correspond to "electron-ionization" as QM claims!

So first we prepare a hydrogen emission setup and use a prism to separate the Lyman(1,∞), Lyman(1,2), Lyman(1,3), and Lyman(1,4) frequencies.  Like this:

HydrogenExperimentLymanB.png

Then we let just the Lyman(1,∞) UV light into an absorption hydrogen vessel.  We block out all the other frequencies.  If Quantum Mythology is correct, then this frequency should ionize any hydrogen atom it contacts.  We put a small voltage across the vapor and see if this Lyman(1,∞) light starts an electric current.  

Next, we do the same for Lyman(1,2), Lyman(1,3), and the Lyman(1,4) frequencies (one at a time) and see what current, if any, they induce.  According to our New Wisdom Theory, all of these frequencies should act the same, including the Lyman(1,∞) frequency!  According to QM, only the Lyman(1,∞) will generate any current.  We need to find out! 

Andrew Ancel Gray

Next:

The Balmer Killer Experiment!

Edited by andrewgray
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Balmer Killer Experiment!

According to Quantum Mythology, the Lyman(1,2) frequency raises the hydrogen's electron from the mythological energy level 1 to the mythological energy level 2, like this:

AtomicEnergyLevelMythologyB.png

We learned from above that hydrogen only absorbs the Lyman Series UV light at room temperature. It does not absorb Balmer or any other series' frequencies at room temperature!  Supposedly, if we shine Lyman(1,2) light into hydrogen, then there will supposedly be many hydrogen atoms "in the n=2 energy level!"  Then, once there, with n=2, these electrons can supposedly experience "Balmer Series absorption" and start absorbing Balmer frequencied light.  We want to prove that this is NOT true, and that the Lyman(1,2) frequency has nothing to do with the mythological n=2 energy level! (The Lyman(1,2) frequency is actually an electron orbital frequency present in the hydrogen!)

So we will use the hydrogen emission setup (in the message above) to isolate the Lyman(1,2) frequency and let it shine into a hydrogen absorption vessel!  According to Quantum Mythology, this should supposedly start Balmer absorption in the hydrogen since there will be electrons present in the mythological n=2 level!

So we simultaneously do a visible-light-hydrogen-absorption-experiment while also shining Lyman(1,2) UV light into the vessel!  If Quantum Mythology is correct, one should be able to get a visible-light-Balmer-absorption-spectrum while doing this absorption spectrum at room temperature!

We need to find out!

In reality, Lyman absorption is just the resonant re-transmission of the UV light (by electrons with these orbital frequencies) "with phase shifts that cancel!"

Andrew Ancel Gray

Edited by andrewgray
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...