Turtle Posted August 11, 2007 Author Report Share Posted August 11, 2007 ...The satellite photography is proving its worth in identifying areas worth further investigation, and looking at the other structures may help refine our skills at ID'ing these critters. We are on the cutting edge -or is that ground floor?- of a resource previously unavailable to scientists let alone the general public. :shrug: Following up with some helpful links. >>NASA's Solar System Exploration: Multimedia: Gallery: Impact Crater DiagramSimple crater forms are typical of structures with rim diameters of less than about 4 kilometers (on Earth); above this transition diameter, craters are characterized by complex morphologies exhibiting central uplifts, shallow floor depths, and slumped rims. For complex craters with diameters of about 4 to 50 kilometers the central uplift occurs as a single peak. Larger impact structures can have complex, ring-shaped central uplifts. Given that Tortuga Jorge is ~135 kilometers in diameter, the muscon, or central uplift area description as 'complex-ring-shaped' applies nicely. No less the shallow floor depth; undecided on slumped rims? Off to track down a few more resources...:hihi:Finding Impact Craters -- Diagramscroll down to see a photomicrograph of shocked minerals that is a slam-dunk ID for impact structures. >> Iowa's Manson Impact Structureat bottom see rock cores from Chicxulub with shocked minerals. at the top & middle see the kind of setup we need over at Tortuga Jorge. Chicxulubrel.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hill Posted August 12, 2007 Report Share Posted August 12, 2007 You might also be interested in checking out another possible impact in NE Vermont, recently found by one of our newest members. I haven't seen so many probable looking impact sites in a while, including yours. Of course the one I "discovered" in Eretria had been posted 2 years ago, just not noticed. Since I'm still unable to link, you can find the VT one in Nature and Geography forum. I emailed the guys at the Impact Crater Database in Canada and got the following canned response. "Hines, Jason Thomas" <[email protected]> to me I will be out of the office until August 21st.So not much help from that area for another 10 days. It seems you have gotten some responses from those you have tried to contact. Take a look at that one in Vermont; it really looks convincing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Turtle Posted August 12, 2007 Author Report Share Posted August 12, 2007 You might also be interested in checking out another possible impact in NE Vermont, recently found by one of our newest members. I haven't seen so many probable looking impact sites in a while, including yours. Of course the one I "discovered" in Eretria had been posted 2 years ago, just not noticed. Since I'm still unable to link, you can find the VT one in Nature and Geography forum (I know - crummy names :D ) I emailed the guys at the Impact Crater Database in Canada and got the following canned response. So not much help from that area for another 10 days. It seems you have gotten some responses from those you have tried to contact. Take a look at that one in Vermont; it really looks convincing. Roger wilco. here's the link to the thread; KML file is in 2nd post. >> Google Earth Community: Impact Crater in Vermont? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hill Posted August 12, 2007 Report Share Posted August 12, 2007 Roger wilco. here's the link to the thread; KML file is in 2nd post. >> Shortly after I sent an "Ask USGS" email, I found this: The Nulhegan Basin was formed when a pool of magma formed within existing metamorphic rock. The magma cooled into a relatively soft granitic rock called quartz monzonite. Once erosion wore away the cap of metamorphic rock, the softer monzonite eroded more rapidly than the surrounding metamorphic rock. This resulted in a relatively flat circular interior area, roughly 10 miles in diameter, surrounded by hills. Sand and gravel were later deposited in the bottom of the Basin by melting glaciers. Friends of the Nulhegan Basin The Nulhegan Basin would seem to be off the list as a possible impact crater.:D Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Turtle Posted October 7, 2007 Author Report Share Posted October 7, 2007 I was checkin' out my crater in Chihuahua for the umpteenth time and noticed GE has added some new high-res imagery of the area. It's not complete yet for the entire ~240^2 miles of the feature, but it is much better than the blurry pixelation we had to rely on before. Toward the middle I found what looks like some mining activity perhaps? Anyway, click on the attached KML file below to activate GE and fly to Crater del Tortuga Jorge. B):confused::confused: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hill Posted October 8, 2007 Report Share Posted October 8, 2007 I think we should add a link to http://hypography.com/forums/environmental-studies/12843-mystery-meteorite-illness.html since it's a proven new impact with lots of coverage - and more to come I suspect. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
estrar Posted June 4, 2008 Report Share Posted June 4, 2008 The area is known as the copper canyon of chihuahua, here is a photo of the area Also, a few kilometers north there is a recent smaller impact: Google Maps Chacmool 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
freeztar Posted August 7, 2008 Report Share Posted August 7, 2008 National Geographic released this interactive impact crater map that shows major impact sites. Earth Scars - Interactive Map - National Geographic Magazine Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cedars Posted September 3, 2009 Report Share Posted September 3, 2009 Researching proglacier lakes brought me to this link which is related to Post #7. Some good pics of rocks formed in part by the impact event. For scale, this impact is much larger than the chicxulub impact. Near the end is an estimation of max wind speeds (1400 mph), 1 - 3 meters of ejecta, and earthquakes. http://www.geo.umn.edu/mgs/meteoriteimpact.pdf Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
freeztar Posted September 3, 2009 Report Share Posted September 3, 2009 Cool article. Near the end is an estimation of max wind speeds (1400 mph), 1 - 3 meters of ejecta, and earthquakes.I don't quite understand their table though. ARRIVAL TIME EFFECT MODERN ANALOG1. ~13 seconds Fireball 3rd degree burns, trees ignite2. ~2-3 minutes Earthquakes Richter scale 10.2 at Sudbury,buildings collapse at Gunflint Lake3. ~5-10 minutes Airborne ejecta a layer 1-3 meters thick, witharrives fragments <1 cm in size4. ~40 minutes Air Blast Maximum wind speeds ~1,400 mph5. ~1-2 hours Tsunami None of this magnitude Why would an air blast arrive 40 minutes after impact? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cedars Posted September 3, 2009 Report Share Posted September 3, 2009 Why would an air blast arrive 40 minutes after impact? Dont know. Maybe the max wasnt sustained and it subsided greatly as it worked away from the impact. At 700 mph it would be around 40 mins. Estimation on the tsunami was 1-2 hours so thats a wave moving between 240 and 480 mph. Big stuff if it was half their estimate. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
freeztar Posted September 4, 2009 Report Share Posted September 4, 2009 Dont know. Maybe the max wasnt sustained and it subsided greatly as it worked away from the impact. Hmm...Maybe it has something to do with the initial shockwave? :confused: Where's that Turtle when you need him? :eek_big: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Turtle Posted September 4, 2009 Author Report Share Posted September 4, 2009 Cool article. I don't quite understand their table though. Why would an air blast arrive 40 minutes after impact? Hmm...Maybe it has something to do with the initial shockwave? Where's that Turtle when you need him? where any self respecting turtle should be during an impact; hiding in a hole in the mud. :eek2: i agree the table is confusing without any calculations. 1,400 mph would reach 466.6 miles in 20 minutes and the distance between impact and the Gunflint site is given as 480 miles. :shrug: Researching proglacier lakes brought me to this link which is related to Post #7. Some good pics of rocks formed in part by the impact event. For scale, this impact is much larger than the chicxulub impact. Near the end is an estimation of max wind speeds (1400 mph), 1 - 3 meters of ejecta, and earthquakes. http://www.geo.umn.edu/mgs/meteoriteimpact.pdf the article has a promotional slant for the region, but nonetheless, a very cool impact and article. thanks Cedars. :) here's some reading on the physics of space rock impacts: >> Impact Geology, Chemistry and Physicsthe game is afoot. :eek: ;) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cedars Posted September 4, 2009 Report Share Posted September 4, 2009 where any self respecting turtle should be during an impact; hiding in a hole in the mud. :eek2: i agree the table is confusing without any calculations. 1,400 mph would reach 466.6 miles in 20 minutes and the distance between impact and the Gunflint site is given as 480 miles. B) Looking back over the article, they used a computer program to calculate whatever:"Collins, G.S., Melosh, J. H., Marcus, R.A., 2005, Earth impact effectsprogram: A web-based computer program for calculating theregional environmental consequences of a meteoroid impact onEarth; Meteorite and Planetary Science 40:817-840." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.