Jump to content
Science Forums


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


Simon4159870717 last won the day on May 27 2020

Simon4159870717 had the most liked content!

1 Follower

About Simon4159870717

  • Rank

Recent Profile Visitors

107 profile views
  1. Thanks for your explaintion. But I am a Relativity skeptics. I admit that my expression is wrong. What I want is some proof that "the speed of light in a vacuum is the same for all observers, regardless of their relative motion or of the motion of the light source". I think this experiment can prove it or not. Each time I asked some questions and always got some theory answer. I care about fact more than theory.
  2. Thanks for your information, it is too much to me. It sounds like somebody has already done this experiment, do you know the name and the result? To me, this experiment can prove light is affected by inertia or not. So I really want to know it.
  3. "not affected by inertia" I mean "the speed of light in a vacuum is the same for all observers, regardless of their relative motion or of the motion of the light source".
  4. If I have two perfectly balanced boards. I shoot a pinball between the two boards at a perpendicular angle (90°), the pinball will bounce back and forth in the same position between the two boards. I think everyone will have no objection to this point, because this pinball is affected by inertia, and the rotation of the earth has no effect on it. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Now presume that light is not affected by inertia. We set up two perfectly balanced mirrors. One faces south and the other faces north. I can set up a light source
  5. I don't think time exists in reality either. I think time is same idea with lenth and weight, it is created by human, it is kind of concept exists in our mind. But it is NOT a fact that can be dilated.
  6. There are other explanations for the fact of atomic clocks on satellites besides the theory of relativity, but you just don't want to know it and just focus at the theory of relativity.
  7. All Energy Hypothesis Simon Zhou Abstract Everything is a state of energy. Energy can influence each other, their relationship can be attraction, mutually exclusive or no affection. Space is kind of energy, it can be consumed and generated. Space consumption causes gravity. Hypothesis Everything is a state of energy There are many forms of energy: particles, rays, fields, etc. They are the smallest constituent unit and cannot be divided anymore. They have no structure or even volume, they are just pure energy exiting. En
  8. Photons Repulsions Hypothesis Light is made of photons In March 1905, Einstein created the quantum theory of light, the idea that light exists as tiny packets, or particles, which he called photons. After this, there appear many theories and conclusions of light. Einstein’s one is good and simple enough , more complicated hypotheses will come out with specific conclusions. Photons are repulsive Between the same kind of energy, they always are repulsive. If they are not repulsive, they probably will merge into a bigger unit, and we should find out the mega size energy. In a distance, they wil
  9. This is similar with Michelson-Morley experiment, base on different understanding about light diffraction, will come out different conclusions. In other words, we can NOT measure the light speeds form east-to-west and from west-to-east yet?
  10. Testing the light speed from west to east and from east to west? Is there any information about it?
  11. Proton-Electron structures consume some Space-Energy, and the Space-Energy will disappear and the space it maintains will be extinguished. The space around the atom is constantly annihilated, and is immediately replenished by the nearby space. The movement of space carries the matters in the space to move. Because the quantity of particles of the earth is so large, the space is annihilated very quickly, and the outer space is also replenished so quickly that we feel that we are pulled to the center of the earth by gravity. In essence, the space under our feet is decreasing, and we are carried
  12. My friend, you exactly understand what I mean. The gravity and universe expanding is the same nature. Universe expanding is SPACE moving to the VOID out of universe, Gravity is SPACE move to the VOID in the nucleus. I made some calculation as below, it is really simple math. In conclusion, Gravity proportional to the mass of the object, and inversely proportional to the square of the distance.
  13. I knew the GPS example, it is written in each book about relativity. I can NOT explain why the satellite set off 38 microseconds per day. It seems like only relativity provide an explanation. But I have an open mind to accept any other explanation, such like "How the electronic clock works". If you want to use GPS example to prove relativity, the quantity of samples is not enough. By the way, I hope let everybody know, even if there is no relativity theory, GPS can work as well.
  • Create New...