Jump to content
Science Forums


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


Posts posted by Thoth101

  1. In his 1905 dissertation for Columbia Teachers College, Elwood Cubberly—the future Dean of Education at Stanford—wrote that schools should be factories “in which raw products, children, are to be shaped and formed into finished products…manufactured like nails, and the specifications for manufacturing will come from government and industry.”

    The next year, the Rockefeller Education Board—which funded the creation of numerous public schools—issued a statement which read in part:

    In our dreams…people yield themselves with perfect docility to our molding hands. The present educational conventions [intellectual and character education] fade from our minds, and unhampered by tradition we work our own good will upon a grateful and responsive folk. We shall not try to make these people or any of their children into philosophers or men of learning or men of science. We have not to raise up from among them authors, educators, poets or men of letters. We shall not search for embryo great artists, painters, musicians, nor lawyers, doctors, preachers, politicians, statesmen, of whom we have ample supply. The task we set before ourselves is very simple…we will organize children…and teach them to do in a perfect way the things their fathers and mothers are doing in an imperfect way.


    Intelligent citizens are difficult to govern. It’s just a fact. The more intelligent you are, the more likely you will know the issues and be aware when you are being fed a bunch of crap. Now ask yourself, how did education in America transform from a system that imparts knowledge to one that uses behavior modification techniques to influence the attitudes and beliefs of those passing through it? By systematically trying to create a nation that works instead of thinks, that’s how.

    You see, the aim of public education is not to spread enlightenment; it is simply to reduce as many individuals as possible to the same safe level, to breed a standard citizenry, to suppress dissent and originality. Public education does not encourage critical thinking nor does it foster imagination. It does not teach emotional intelligence. It does not encourage the pupils to work together to solve problems. It does not seek out and help nurture an individual’s innate skills and abilities. It just gives you tasks.

    As Albert Einstein said, “Never confuse education with intelligence.” 


    The Origins of Education and Mandatory Schooling
    Prior to the late 1800’s, education was a private practice that took place in private institutions or through home schooling. That all changed in 1902 when John D. Rockefeller created the general education board in conjunction with Frederick T. Gates. Frederick T. Gates was a close friend, business and personal advisor to Rockefeller. The general education board was responsible for funding the American public school system, and provided over one hundred million dollars in 1902 while continuing their support beyond 1902. If we follow the money, the general education board was responsible for the creation of the American public school system. Does education not play a large role in manipulating the consciousness of human beings? By consciousness manipulation I mean trying to influence the way that the human being perceives the environment around them. In order to implement this system, teachers need to teach, and somebody needs to teach the teachers, and somebody needs to teach them too. It’s time we start questioning the real purpose of education and who exactly is putting human beings through this system, and for what purpose?
    “I don’t want a nation of thinkers, I want a nation of workers.” – John D Rockefeller
  2. "The CIA owns everyone of any significance in the major media."
    Former CIA Director William Colby

    Declassified CIA Documents show Agency's....Control over Mainstream Media

    A declassified document from the CIA archives in the form of a letter from a CIA task force addressed to the Director of the Central Intelligence Agency details the close relationship that exists between the CIA and mainstream media and academia.

    The document states that the CIA task force,

    "now has relationships with reporters from every major wire service, newspaper, news weekly, and television network in the nation,"and that "this has helped us turn some 'intelligence failure' stories into 'intelligence success' stories, and has contributed to the accuracy of countless others."  

    Furthermore, it explains how the agency has,

    "persuaded reporters to postpone, change, hold, or even scrap stories that could have adversely affected national security interests or jeopardized sources and methods."

    Although it is a document outlining their desire to become more open and transparent, the deception outlined by various whistleblowers (example)requires us to read between the lines and recognize that the relationships shared between intelligence agencies and our sources of information are not always warranted and pose inherent conflicts of interest.



    A vast amount of links about the Mainstream Media to learn about.





  3. 14 hours ago, VictorMedvil said:

    It seems virologists have charted the transmission and pathogenesis of COVID19, read more at https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m3862

    That would have been a nice find but when you scroll down to the bottom it says:

    How this article was created

    We searched PubMed from 2000 to 18 September 2020, limited to publications in English. Our search strategy used a combination of key words including “COVID-19,” “SARS-CoV-2,” “SARS”, “MERS,” “Coronavirus,” “Novel Coronavirus,” “Pathogenesis,” “Transmission,” “Cytokine Release,” “immune response,” “antibody response.” These sources were supplemented with systematic reviews. We also reviewed technical documents produced by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and World Health Organization technical documents.

    That all seems pretty fishy to me and they still have not isolated it. In other words they are just copy and pasting from other material which may not even be accurate at all. They have been working on this scam for a long time.

    I think in this 8 minute video Dr Thomas Cowen explains the truth of the matter.



  4. https://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica2/sociopol_bigbrother247.htm

    Even if it has been a while since you read Fahrenheit 451, you might remember Ray Bradbury's classic for its portrayal of a dystopian future in which an authoritarian government burns books.

    Read Fahrenheit 451 again to discover why people wanted their tyrannical government to burn books. Bradbury wrote Fahrenheit 451 in 1953, yet the parallels to today's social climate for censorship are haunting.

    Bradbury's protagonist is Guy Montag, who, like all firemen in Bradbury's future, burns books.

    In Bradbury's dystopia, firemen became,

    "custodians of our peace of mind, the focus of our understandable and rightful dread of being inferior; official censors, judges, and executors."

    Today's mainstream and social media are "custodians of our peace of mind" as they filter out "conflicting theory and thought."


    Captain Beatty is Montag's boss.


    Beatty explained,

    "If you don't want a man unhappy politically, don't give him two sides to a question to worry him; give him one."

    If you don't want people debating questions such as Covid-19 policy, Beatty has the ticket:

    "Cram them full of noncombustible data, chock them so damned full of 'facts' they feel stuffed, but absolutely 'brilliant' with information.


    Then they'll feel they're thinking, they'll get a sense of motion without moving."

    Today, millions listen daily to reports of case counts of Covid-19.

    Like Bradbury predicted, listeners can recite the numbers but have no context to make sense of the numbers...

    Many have little idea that important scientists and doctors have advocated alternatives to lockdowns that could save lives and abate catastrophic impacts on economies.


    As in Bradbury's world, many are working tirelessly to disparage and censor alternative views


    After Montag questions his role as a book burner, he recites Dover Beach by Matthew Arnold to neighbors. His neighbors were shocked at the feelings the poem provoked.


    One cries out,

    "Silly words, silly words, silly awful hurting words… Why do people want to hurt people? Not enough hurt in the world, you've got to tease people with stuff like that!"

    Incredibly, Bradbury anticipated today's social climate where people claim censorship is justified because someone hurt their feelings.


    Beatty explains a dominant social norm justifying censorship:

    Do not offend minorities...

    Bradbury is clear:

    "minorities" meant practically everyone:

    "Don't step on the toes of the dog-lovers, the cat-lovers, doctors, lawyers, merchants, chiefs, Mormons, Baptists, Unitarians, second-generation Chinese, Swedes, Italians, Germans, Texans, Brooklynites, Irishmen, people from Oregon or Mexico."

    Pretending you can "stay happy all the time" was another social norm driving popular demand for censorship in Fahrenheit 451.


    Beatty explains,  

    "(Censorship) didn't come from the Government down.


    There was no dictum, no declaration, no censorship, to start with, no! Technology, mass exploitation, and minority pressure carried the trick, thank God.


    Today, thanks to them, you can stay happy all the time, you are allowed to read comics, the good old confessions, or trade journals."

    In Bradbury's dystopia, to consider conflicting theories makes for unhappiness, so Beatty lauds the fireman's mission and justifies censorship:

    "The important thing for you to remember, Montag, is we're the Happiness Boys, the Dixie Duo, you and I and the others.


    We stand against the small tide of those who want to make everyone unhappy with conflicting theory and thought. We have our fingers in the dyke.


    Hold steady. Don't let the torrent of melancholy and dreary philosophy drown our world. We depend on you.


    I don't think you realize how important you are, we are, to our happy world as it stands now."

    In Bradbury's future, intellectuals came under scrutiny when ideas conflicted.

    The word "intellectual" became a "swear word."


    The public dreaded "the unfamiliar" and disdained a world where merit mattered.

    Again, Bradbury has Beatty explain the mindset behind such thinking: 

    "We must all be alike.


    Not everyone born free and equal, as the Constitution says, but everyone made equal. Each man the image of every other; then all are happy, for there are no mountains to make them cower, to judge themselves against.


    So! A book is a loaded gun in the house next door. Burn it. Take the shot from the weapon. Breach man's mind.


    Who knows who might be the target of the well read man?" 

    In Bradbury's dystopia, thinking was not welcome. Even front porches were eliminated. One of Montag's young neighbors explained why:

    "People sat there sometimes at night, talking when they wanted to talk, rocking, and not talking when they didn't want to talk.


    Sometimes they just sat there and thought about things, turned things over… they didn't want people sitting like that, doing nothing, rocking, talking; that was the wrong kind of social life.


    People talked too much. And they had time to think." 

    Social distancing is today embraced as a way to keep us 'safe' from Covid-19.

    Social distancing also keeps us safe from "conflicting theories and thoughts."


    Chairs have been removed from social gathering places.


    Hallways are quiet.


    Nobody stands around the water cooler.


    People have few places to talk with each other.


    The parallel to porches is haunting. 


    Perhaps you are sensing a shift in social norms undermining parental rights and the sanctity of the family...

    Bradbury foresaw a push for government-funded pre-school.


    Captain Beatty explains,

    "The home environment can undo a lot you try to do at school. That's why we've lowered the kindergarten age year after year until now we're almost snatching them from the cradle."

    Bradbury also anticipated today's justification of looting.

    Some claim that rioters are merely damaging property, not people...

    Before he began to see the evil he was part of, Montag eased his conscience with this similar line of thinking:

    "You weren't hurting anyone, you were hurting only things! And since things really couldn't be hurt, since things felt nothing, and things don't scream or whimper."

    Warning his readers of policies shaped by the majority, Bradbury writes,

    "The most dangerous enemy of truth and freedom, the solid unmoving cattle of the majority. Oh, God, the terrible tyranny of the majority."

    Today, politicians claim the right to destroy freedom when they get a majority vote of the people.

    This dangerous reasoning is antithetical to the founding principles of this country...

    We can take a lesson from Bradbury's character Professor Faber, who recognized the consequences of his own self-censorship:

    "I saw the way things were going, a long time back. I said nothing.


    I'm one of the innocents who could have spoken up and out when no one would listen to the 'guilty,' but I did not speak and thus became guilty myself."  

    How ironic that today, claiming they are "woke," progressives clamor for tyranny and censorship.


    In Bradbury's world the "woke" saw through the lies of tyranny and censorship. Bradbury would exhort us to avoid expediency and speak out to prevent the worst.


    In his novel, Bradbury didn't take a deep dive into the psychology of saying nothing. My recent essay on mask mandates by businesses provoked a strong response.


    Many were sympathetic to my point that businesses respond to consumer demand. Yet, some believe that business policy is being shaped by a small but frightened and very vocal minority who complain loudly to managers about customers not wearing a mask. 


    Going against the vocal herd takes courage...


    In his book The Heart Aroused, poet David Whyte, who works with businesses on organizational change issues, shares a universal story: 

    "A man I know finds himself in a meeting room at the very edge of speech; he is approaching his moment of reckoning, he is looking for support from his fellow executives around the table… the CEO is pacing up and down on the slate gray carpet.


    He has asked, in no uncertain terms, for their opinion of the plan he wants to put through. 'I want to know what you all think about this,' he demands, 'on a scale of one to ten.'" 

    Whyte explains the CEO made it plain he wanted to hear "ten."


    Whyte's friend thinks the plan is terrible, and rumors are that other executives feel the same. As the CEO goes around the room, Whyte's friend hears his colleague, one by one, say "ten."


    When it is his turn,

    "against everything he believes, (Whyte's friend) hears a mouselike, faraway voice, his own, saying 'ten'."

    According to Elisabeth Noelle-Neumann's theory of the spiral of silence,

    "our willingness to express an opinion is a direct result of how popular or unpopular we perceive it to be."

    When we believe our belief is popular, we will make a point of signaling that we are part of the herd.


    Like Whyte's friend, we will avoid expressing our point of view when we sense it will be unpopular.


    If you think the public is empowered by social media to express unpopular views, you would be mistaken. As in Fahrenheit 451, people censor themselves first, even before Facebook and Twitter add their own censorship. 


    In 2014, the Pew Research Center surveyed the public about their willingness to freely express their views about the 2013 Edward Snowden revelations.


    The survey revealed that,

    "people were less willing to discuss the Snowden-NSA story on social media than they were in person."

    Social media was not an outlet for those concerned about expressing an unpopular view. 


    Consistent with the "spiral of silence" theory and compatible with Bradbury's dystopian future, no matter what the setting, people are reluctant to share an 'unpopular view'.


    A 2020 Cato survey found 62%,

    "of Americans say the political climate these days prevents them from saying things they believe because others might find them offensive."


    how many say nothing to their neighbors and colleagues about Covid-19 policies for fear of being accused of not 'valuing' human lives...?

    In Fahrenheit 451,

    silence helped pave the way for the public's embrace of tyranny...

    In 2020, Fahrenheit 451 is far more than a chilling, cautionary tale.


    To reverse the spiral of silence we must make space for candid conversations by thoughtfully considering alternative viewpoints...




    1984  -  Brave New World


  5. 6 hours ago, RaccoonRanger said:


    But you fail to take into consideration nefarious forces behind such calamties and situations.

    There are Bad forces at work behind the scenes, especially in media, and if you can't grasp that then you are probably naive.

    Not Ickey David Lizard People, But Agenda 21 is a real thing.

    I care not for your patience for me.. That in itself is very selfish.  I maintain an open mind. 

    Great points, and to be clear David Icke doesn't just talk about Reptilians and he has covered Agenda 21 and just about anything you can think about in his 800 page books.

    Agenda 21





  6. 10 hours ago, Anchovyforestbane said:

    I suppose, just like your buddy Monty, you also don't listen too well. 
    If you had been you would have picked up on my saying "which is to say, in this case, equally as ludicrous". Anyone with an objective, unbiased stance would've seen that I was not expressing an opinion about the media, but rather criticizing your point about the media.
    Yes, many mainstream media outlets are biased, in many of those cases against that which is true. Given that this wasn't the topic of my criticism, however, I would encourage you to pay further analysis to opposing arguments.

    Well, touché then and I apologize if I misunderstood what you were trying to say. Well, I was actually on the other side of the argument at one time when I believed the government cared for me and I believed the media was there to tell us the truth. When I tried to prove they did, I came to find out that wasn't true at all.

    I actually signed up for the US Air Force in 2001 when I actually believed what the media told me and government that it was Arabs in a cave that blew up the WTC. So when you say to give further analysis to opposing arguments, I have because I was part of those opposing arguments at one time when I was a mind controlled and asleep fool. Taught by the government American edumacation system. And yes, I spelled education wrong on purpose. So Monty, you can refrain from your spell check.😆

  7. On 10/27/2020 at 11:28 AM, montgomery said:

    On the videos you post, I've never been wrong. They're all nonsense that's being promoted for profit by people who think they can capitalize on the UFO/alien imaginings and possible sightings. So I've decided to just reject them because there are other reportings that are much closer to being credible. I might find one or two of the best of them for you so we can discuss the topic in a sensible way.

    Like I said, I might be wrong. But I still have a great deal of confidence that I'm right because even the best reportings I've been able to find are full of flaws.

    I take much the same position as Dawkins and De Grasse Tyson. They are trustworthy and well known scientists who frankly, wouldn't sit in the same room as David Icke.

    If you ever want to find common ground with any rational person on this board then you're just going to have to start thinking a little more clearly and rationally. 

    There are three classes of people: those who see. Those who see when they are shown. Those who do not see.” ― Leonardo da Vinci

    You seem to be in the camp of those who do not see. I do like what Dawkins said about religion and that is about it. However you need to realize both those "scientist" are mainstream scientist. Those who fund and funded them are the same ones perpetuating the lies and false narratives of the reality we are really in. Which really is nothing but an illusion, grasshopper Monty.

    “The masses have never thirsted after truth. They turn aside from evidence that is not to their taste, preferring to deify error, if error seduces them. Whoever can supply them with illusions is easily their master; whoever attempts to destroy their illusions is always their victim.” – Gustave Le Bon, “The Crowd: A Study of the Popular Mind“, 1895

  8. COVID-1984 FOI Request | UK Government Admits Virus Doesn’t Exist

    While preparing the court papers for the Private Criminal Prosecution of MPs for pandemic fraud, we have discovered that the office of the secretary of state for mandatory vaccinations has now admitted in a Freedom of Information Request [FOI] that they have no records which show that the cause of the COVID 19 virus has ever been proven to exist.

    Yes, you did read that correctly.




  9. On 10/27/2020 at 11:17 AM, montgomery said:

    The quick answer is that the US is again trying to demonize all it's competitors and China is no exception. But this time the competitor is too big and it has most of the world's countries as it's friends, because  China hasn't attempted to control the world by force.

    If Trump wins election I highly suspect that he will begin to deal with China in the same way he's been dealing with Russia, and that will be a good thing. I have no interest or care for what Trump will do to the US on domestic policy. 

    Strange how many of Thoth's videos don't exist!

    Yes. Another video being censored. We are definitely living in 1984. For a good laugh, they haven't censored this "parody" video yet. Ummm, we buy most of our goods from China thanks to implementation of NAFTA and most of our labor being shipped to China. They aren't really our competitors if we need China for goods and they are buying up many things in the US. One example is billions of dollars from China going to the NBA. They are on a full takeover of America and Biden would just hand them the keys.

    Way to go Joe: China Biden Campaign Parody


  10. The Deception of Virology & Vaccines | Why Coronavirus Is Not Contagious

    This post intends to go to the heart of virology and vaccination itself and what vaccination is propped up by – the entirety of virology and vaccine science is predicated on one thing—that viruses are infectious agents that cause disease.

    Without this theory, vaccines would not be ‘effective’ or ‘work’ in the minds of the people.

    Without the virus theory, vaccines would crumble like a house of cards.

    This article will show the pseudoscience behind the theories that prop up virology and the vast problems with it.

    Viruses Are Not Living Organisms

    Firstly, viruses are not living organisms or living microbes.

    They do not have a respiratory system, nor do they have a nucleus or digestive system.

    Viruses are not alive and viruses are not contagious.

    The fear behind Coronavirus, for instance, is wholly unwarranted.

    Forget everything you think you know about viruses and bacteria. You have been lied to.

    The science of virology is based upon the study of viruses. However, no real footage of viral activity exists (except for a recently released (2018) short footage of an HIV virus which shows merely 20% of the virus theory process). Such footage is merely 3D animation and models.

    Scientific Encyclopedia states viruses have been obtained for experimentation by means of extremely powerful centrifuges which must be specially built.

    Viruses are so small that they average around 0.1 microns in size for a typical virus.

    Observation Of Viruses Is Inherently Flawed

    Viruses are observed in cell cultures/petri-dish environments.

    Cell cultures are grown in controlled conditions outside their natural environment, wherein cells are artificially kept alive by fluids that are toxic and do damage to cellular activity.

    In such a sterile environment, cells cannot utilize the full range of their normal cleansing methods as they would in the human body.

    Those processes are:

    Phagocytosis (and all of its processes)
    Viral (virus)

    In the processes of phagocytosis, cellular debris and dead and dying tissue are absorbed and discarded for elimination out of the body.

    It is bacteria that first and foremost carry out this process in large part—mainly as scavengers.

    Fungus and parasites are called upon as needed in special cases, and in this process, small amounts of viruses may be utilized to accompany all other processes.

    All of these processes are alive, but viruses are not alive.

    In such an artificial environment wherein cells are kept alive but not healthy by serums, cells will degenerate, and their viral janitors will become prominent.

    Viruses do not multiply on their own. When added to fertile petri-dishes that sustain cellular life, no additional viral protein structures appear.

    Only when cells are added is there multiplication of viral protein structures. However, this is because petri-dishes are not the proper or healthy environment for cells, and so viral waste occurs.

    This is because cells must manufacture viruses to cleanse themselves in such a toxic environment since they do not have access to the full range of their cleansing processes as would occur in the body. I will show why—

    Note: Viruses are necessary to dissolve dead and dying tissue when tissue is so toxic that living microbes cannot feed upon and eliminate those tissues, waste, and cellular debris without being poisoned to death.

    When Would Viral Activity Become Prominent?

    As stated, viruses may accompany these processes in small amounts. However, viruses will only become prominent when all these other processes have been largely killed due to:

    Environmental toxicity
    Chemical inundation
    Poor air quality
    Poor water quality
    Poor food quality
    Nutritional deficiencies
    Wrong combination or choice of foods
    Medical treatment, such as antibiotics and medications

    When a body has a high degree of toxicity, bacteria feeding upon that toxic dead matter and tissue will be poisoned to death.

    When the body is at such a point of systemic toxicity, where bacterial levels and all living microbes in the body have been diminished or killed due to the above reasons, the body will call upon the help of viruses to help cleanse itself.

    When the body cannot utilize milder methods, such as a cold (usually bacterial), it will utilize the help of non-living protein solvents which are known as viruses. I will show why this is the only logical answer.

    Viruses help consume and eliminate substances into small particles that can then be expelled via mucous membranes, out through the skin, or through the intestinal tract.

    Cells produce viruses when their tissues are so toxic that phagocytes, parasites, bacteria, and fungi cannot help cleanse, repair and regenerate their tissues and fluids.

    Science states, incorrectly without proof, that viruses originate outside the body, then ‘hijack’ the RNA or DNA of the cell, and then replicate whilst attacking cells indiscriminately.

    If this were true, viruses would replicate endlessly, eventually attacking all healthy cells, but they do not.

    We know that antibodies, a type of white blood cell, regulates the virus.

    There exists no video evidence of viruses hijacking cells, except for 3D renders, and animations based on theory.

    The True Creation of Viruses (simplistic view)

    Science falsely claims that viruses replicate themselves. In reality, it is the cell itself that is producing the virus.

    Notice how viruses are manufactured by a healthy cell but do not destroy it.

    RNA and/or DNA is given by the host cell to dissolve specific substances within the body. If this were not the case, the virus would destroy the cell which created it, but it does not.

    The virus is ejected, damaging part of the cell, but not destroying it completely. The cell is then able to repair itself in time.

    Cells conspire as one unit to cleanse themselves and their surroundings so that new cellular activity can thrive.

    Large amounts of viral activity are present when the body is unable to use milder living microbial detoxification methods to cleanse itself due to systemic toxicity of tissues that poison living microbes.

    Steps for Creation of a Virus

    Viral proteins part of the genome of the living body existing in every cell which determines what type of proteins will be created by a cell is called into action.
    Viral proteins existing in the cell enter the nucleus of the cell. Viruses are manufactured in their whole form within the cell, and sequenced/encoded via RNA/DNA host directives.
    The virus leaves the nucleus and is housed in the cell until it leaves the cell.
    The virus is ejected by the cell, damaging a part of the cell, but not destroying it.
    Viruses change every 72 hours.
    Virus replication continues and every 72 hours the first strain is exhausted and an entirely new set of viruses is then manufactured by cells to continue the job of the previous, until the process is complete.

    How Viruses are Manufactured | The True Processes of the Virus

    Viruses do not infect healthy stable cells. They dissolve dead and decaying cells and tissue, dissolving them so that new cellular activity can thrive.

    A good analogy:

    Flies appear on dead matter but are not the cause of the dead matter. They are scavengers that break down dead matter. In this way, viruses and bacteria operate in the same exact manner within the body. Without scavengers on Earth to clean up waste, Earth’s air would become toxic. The same processes are carried out in the body on a microscopic macro level.

    Science states the opposite of what reality dictates to us through our own observation of nature. This is impossible because our bodies are microcosms for the way nature operates outside our bodies. Assuming the opposite of this goes against our observable nature and is foolish.

    As stated, when the normal janitorial functions of the body have been largely diminished and killed due to systemic toxicity, cells can no longer maintain themselves. Red blood cells come together as a whole unit to save themselves and conspire to cleanse themselves by manufacturing solvent protein constructs (virus) that disassemble and break down dead and dying cells, cellular waste, tissue, and foreign debris.

    Cells manufacture viruses in their whole form cellularly. In this process, viruses are manufactured directly within the cell using pre-existing viral protein in the cell and genome, and are embedded/encoded with RNA and/or DNA by the host cell.

    The cell ejects the virus, which is then regulated by white blood cells through that encoding (antibodies), which oversee the processes of the virus. This allows the viral activity to be controlled and regulated properly.

    These two functions are united as one process, and they do not act separately. Once the cell ejects this virus, the cell is partially damaged but is not destroyed. The viruses, which are many, consume and dissolve dead, dying and foreign tissue, debris, unhealthy cells, and cellular waste.

    This process takes time depending on the toxicity involved. The effects of their elimination are the symptoms experienced in cold or flu. Viruses break these substances down into tiny particles that can then be expelled via mucous, skin, and bowels.

    When the process is complete, the body becomes stronger, so long as that person does not continue to toxify his or her body further. If he or she does, such extreme detoxifications will always occur.

    Viral Facts

    Viruses cannot enter through the skin or eyes. Such vectors do not work because the mucus membranes and the immune system discard small amounts of foreign proteins such as viruses.

    Viruses cannot enter through wounds because we bleed outwardly, not inwardly.

    Viruses do not ‘exist’ outside of petri-dish solutions or a living body.

    Viruses cannot function without a host cell that manufactures them and encodes them, and viruses cannot replicate without a host cell.

    Viruses do not ‘infect’ or ‘invade’ cells. They are not alive to do so in the first place.

    Viruses almost never dissolve living tissue, unless in specific circumstances such as polio and degenerative nervous system diseases where metal toxicity is present.

    Viruses’ primary function is to dissolve dead matter.

    Cells produce different viral strains depending on the condition of the tissue involved.

    There are 320,000 viral strains inherent to the human body, and each cell contains the viral protein makeup to manufacture each strain when the body calls for it.

    Viruses are sequenced/encoded by blood cells via RNA/DNA to break down specific dead and dying tissue and waste.

    Viruses are very specific protein structures.

    Coughing, sneezing, and spitting is not a vector for the transmission of viruses. Saliva and mucus membranes break down any such particles.

    Skin is not a vector either because viruses cannot cross dead skin layers.

    Viruses are a result of internal toxicity caused by the environment.

    Viruses are cyclical in animals.

    Viruses feed upon waste products in the blood and tissue.

    The only way to get a virus outside of natural means is via direct injection (vaccine) or blood transfusions of a patient who has a virus. However, in such cases, the body only analyzes it as foreign tissue that must be eliminated.

    Since the virus did not originate within the bodily host, that body does not know the time and place that the virus will be active nor does it have the key to decode it (RNA or DNA encoded by the cell) and cannot find the time of its activity.

    As such, it is analyzed as a foreign substance that must be eliminated. Protein solvents (viruses) are manufactured of varying strengths to discard this waste if living microbes cannot eliminate it.

    Throughout the year, upon season and climatic/temperature changes, the body will dump mass amounts of toxins into the blood for removal. Some of these toxins are so toxic in nature, such as mercury, formaldehyde, and other chemical byproducts, that living microbes cannot feed upon and eliminate them without dying.

    Non-living proteins are then manufactured by each cell in the corresponding location of the body where this cleansing is necessary. Those toxic substances are disassembled and broken down by viruses so that the body can eliminate them, restoring homeostasis.

    The only way viruses can be used as biological weapons is via injection, period. It is possible that such manmade viral strains are included in regular existing vaccines, and this should not be ruled out as a possibility, but as previously stated, viral strains from outside the body are not recognized.

    However, man-made substances that are injected can be designed to provoke extreme reactions in humans via various levels of tissue sterilization and adjuvants.

    Viruses cannot cross-species ie; from animal to mankind. It is impossible for humans to develop animal flus—A. Because viruses are not contagious, and, B. Because animal RNA/DNA is not compatible with human RNA/DNA.

    The only way animal tissue can be observed in the blood is through injection of animal tissues, which make their way to the blood, bypassing the digestive tract. Only then will swine tissue, or bird tissue, or any such animal tissue appear in the body.

    When animal meat is consumed by a human, it is converted into human tissue. Human cells cannot produce animal cells or viruses. If we develop viruses, they are human viruses. Even if animal viruses ‘hijacked’ human cells, human cells cannot possibly produce animal viruses

    Coronavirus is a respiratory virus manufactured by cells in the lungs and respiratory areas to cleanse themselves of systemic toxicity.

    Such a cold virus occurs and functions in the following way:

    Chemically toxic substances from the air are breathed into the lungs and respiratory system>Toxic particles land onto the surface of the lungs and the fluid-filled sacs in the lungs (alveoli) where they cannot be dislodged or dissolved by living microbes because of their toxicity and nature>Specific non-living protein solvent structures (virus) are then manufactured by cells in the respiratory system to disassemble and break down these substances in the lungs>Mild flu-like symptoms usually result, including coughing and fever, which initiates the cleansing and healing process.

    Coughing brings blood and nutrients to the respiratory system. The symptoms associated with their removal are what occurs during SARS. Such airborne toxic substances are caused by burning plastics, formaldehyde, and factory tainted air, which encompasses a wide array of very toxic byproducts.

    Older individuals with already weakened immune systems are prone to more advanced respiratory virus detoxifications and will account for most deaths. This illness may crop up in millions due to dense populations like in China breathing in such air on a daily basis. This does not mean it is contagious—it’s not.

    The 4 Main Steps For Coronavirus Creation
    1. Chemically toxic substances from the air are breathed into the lungs and respiratory system.

    2. Toxic particles land onto the surface of the lungs and the fluid-filled sacs in the lungs (alveoli), where they cannot be dislodged or dissolved by living microbes because of their toxicity and nature.

    3. Specific non-living protein solvent structures (virus) are then manufactured by cells in the respiratory system to disassemble and break down these substances in the lungs.

    4. Mild flu-like symptoms usually result, including coughing and fever, which initiate the cleansing and healing process.

    Why Viruses Arise In The Body
    As previously stated, the processes of phagocytosis, fungal, parasitical, and bacterial, which are all living microbes, are responsible for consuming and eliminating dead cells, cellular waste, and foreign debris. But when tissue is so toxic that those living microbes cannot feed upon and eliminate those substances without being poisoned to death, cells will conspire to cleanse themselves by manufacturing specific non-living solvents know as viruses, which break down and disassemble those substances into particles to be expelled out through the skin, mucus, and bowels.

    Viruses leave the cell, damaging only a part of the cell, but not destroying it. Once out of the cell, they are regulated by white blood cell antibodies to dissolve specific tissues and debris necessary to restore relative homeostasis.

    Viruses do not destroy the cell wherein they are replicated, yet science states they infect other cells and DO destroy other cells indiscriminately, which has no proof and makes no logical sense. Such a theory is obviously untrue because then viruses would attack every living cell without a cause, killing the body every time, but this does not happen. Viruses only dissolve dead and dying waste in almost all circumstances.

    The only time a virus would appear to attack living tissue is when metals are embedded in the tissue, such as polio cases, where viruses have to get into spinal column areas and cleanse tissue. Since metal is hard to remove from the body, it is natural for viruses to break down living tissue to remove those metals, which gives the illusion that the virus is somehow working against the body. In reality, the virus is attempting to heal the systemic toxicity of the body and reverse it.

    There is no other explanation for how the human body maintains itself. It is the only logical answer. The truth has been hidden by science for almost 200 years, yet was revealed long ago in the 1800s by scientists such as Antoine Béchamp, who documented in his own experiments that viruses are terrain dependent, non-living agents that break down waste matter, that they come from within, not from without.

    Viruses are nothing more than proteins that cleanse. The same is true about cancer. Cancer is another way the body tries to heal itself, by cocooning dead cells in a tumor in which the body is incapable of removing properly so that it can dissolve and cleanse those cells from the body at a later time. The body is miraculous and finds ways to heal no matter the circumstances. It has ways of short-circuiting and short-cutting pathways in times of trouble.

    It is sad that modern science has led so many astray in their thinking with regard to their own bodies and how it functions creating nothing but fear and panic, whilst reaping massive amounts of money for those in power as a result. Such fear places a distrust in our own bodies, our neighbors and nature itself, making it appear as if we are powerless in the face of disease; that it is beyond our control and only the medical establishment can save us from ourselves.

    How might those in power benefit from such chaos? Explore that thought. This confusion has led to the coronavirus ‘outbreak’ and the resulting fear and chaos which surrounds this manufactured and blown out of proportion event.

    This virus is obviously being used to institute police state style laws and measures around the world and these will only increase if the majority do not wake up to the lies surrounding the nature of viruses and disease.


  11. This author understands that the virus myth, akin to the germ theory myth and contagion myth have been well propagated and established in the religious-like belief systems of modern medicine. There is much false information regarding these topics that have been accepted without further question. The “science” will say Koch’s Postulates for viral contagion have been satisfied, but that is not actually the case. Healthy people are diseased? Nonsense, and is not part of the postulates which clearly states that the microorganism that is said to be creating symptoms (symptoms which are a mark of the body healing itself) should NOT be found in healthy individuals.

    As I have come to understand it via deep research and study, that what we call viruses are actually bodily cell protein fragments, generally somatids or microzyma, which sprout from the red blood cell membranes, as has been well understood and studied in the pleomorphic scientific understanding and put forth via the terrain theory. Bacteria can become viruses, or morph into fungal forms depending on the triggers from the terrain or milleu of the body. They are meant to be of aid to the health situation of the body. Somatids that are created to carry DNA or RNA (covered with a capsule) are designed to repair cellular genetic material and not meant to be pathogenic. There are other cells of the body being mistaken for viruses, as many vesicles look similar in nature. For example, exosomes which help to move materials around the body, actually look identical to certain pollens and are often mistaken for “viruses”.

    This is not to say that pathogenic forms cannot be created by a severely damaged terrain, for this is what happens in death! One’s own cells change format to breakdown dead tissue and recycle it. There is no difference in a state of disease where there will be dead and damaged tissue, except that there are repair factors included, as well. Modern medicine has a cause and effect problem. They seem to find organisms at the scene and they are immediately blamed for the cause of the disease when it is the precise opposite! When you make garbage, the flies are attracted to it, but they did not cause it. It would be insane to point at a pile of garbage full of flies and state “Look all this garbage the flies have made!” Of course, this is a ridiculous notion, and just as ridiculous to a practitioner like myself, well studied in the history of modern medicine and the in-fighting regarding these varying theories, when someone states they have a cold or flu or any other disease caused by a virus!

    “We must look rationally at the bacterial issue. Consider the fact that many tribes ate primarily unsalted raw meat, unsalted raw fats and/or unsalted raw dairy products from the beginning. They did not wash their hands or sterilize their food before eating. Every form of natural bacteria, including salmonella, E. coli and campylobacter were eaten with their food abundantly and constantly. Why were they vibrant, healthy and disease free if microbes are the culprits?”

    — Aajonus Vonderplanitz, The Recipe for Living Without Disease

    When the terrain of the body is in healthy working order, which means there are ample nutritional reserves to remove wastes and repair cells, the teaming bacteria within us, (of which there are 10 times more cells of than our own cells!), operate in harmonic synergy without producing overt symptoms of release/expression. We dislike being “sick” but it’s getting “sick” which is the process of self-healing.

    “Give me fever and I can cure every disease.” -Hippocrates

    When we suppress the symptoms with drugs, vaccines, and other poisons, we worsen the prognoses, leading to further organ damage and reduced life span. These poisons give a “magic show” effect, which gives the illusion of health by no longer allowing the body to do the rebalancing work via release/expression. The shallow thinking is “symptoms gone equals cure given”, which is the exact opposite of how health and the body really works. This is precisely how the corrupted modern medical cult brainwashes people into thinking they are curing disease. All sleight-of-hand, make-believing themselves into false heroes when really they are two-bit magicians who embarrassingly ignore literally millions of natural remedies and holistic techniques available to us, which actually heal the body complex, since the dawn of time.

    Time to shift our mind away from lies and toward real science coupled with our inner knowing alongside proper historical and physical research.

    Amandha Vollmer



  12. On 10/27/2020 at 1:35 PM, montgomery said:

    Thoth, you can't continue to try to promote outdated theories that have been proven to be nonsense a hundred years ago or more. We can try to find some common ground on issues such as UFO's and aliens but we can't entertain pure nonsense. 

    Do your part and help to get this forum back on track.

    I am not surprised you didn't watch the videos. If you would have, you would have realized Amandha Vollmer is one of your fellow Canadians.

    There are many issues to unpack as you investigate the health fraud of the current false pandemic. The many failings of the RT-PCR Test and the unknown fragments of RNA it identifies are one component, along with the suspicious match of one of the primer sequences with the human Chromosome 8. Amandha Dawn Vollmer is familiar with all of these. But perhaps most importantly she has a firm grasp of the unproven myth of contagion. Otherwise known as ‘germ theory’ or the ‘theory of infectious disease’.

    The belief that small microbes that move around in the environment are dangerous agents of disease has been with us since the days of Louis Pasteur about 140 years. But his claims have been shown to be fraudulent and un-proven from his own diaries. His ‘Germ Theory’ model of disease causation fits with superficial glances at how disease occurs and that numbers of people in one place often become sick together, but it doesn’t take a proper scientifically literate view of all the facts. It is a typical rush to judgment that confuses correlation with causation.


  13. On 10/28/2020 at 2:27 PM, montgomery said:

    I'm not going to disregard anything for your pleasure. Why did you make up the story for a second time? The first time could be excused because you failed to think of a natural explanation, and that's common to most Americans. It's the reason why we have dingbats like Thoth on a science forum. But the second time is inexcuable because you had to fabricate a lie and say you saw the tail again. Had you actually have seen a tail on Mars the entire scientific community which is involved with the applicable science would be asking big questions. AND THEY'RE NOT! 


    That is funny coming from someone who don't even know the definition of science.

    Science is a systematic method of continuing investigation, based on observation, scientific hypothesis testing, measurement, experimentation, and theory building, which leads to explanations of natural phenomena, processes, or objects, that are open to further testing, revision, and falsification, and while not 'believed in' through faith are accepted or rejected on the basis of scientific evidence."


  14. 12 hours ago, montgomery said:

    Covid, racism, and the mentally ill president are the news. Covering those is what's called journalism and it's meant to sell advertised products and always has been. Instead of the constarnt whining about it, why not try to suggest something for the news that could replace it.

    The Canadian media covers all the news that's worth broadcasting, including the news that you ignorant Americans don't like. Try tuning in to BBC or CBC sometime instead of punishing yourself with Fox noise.

    I'm giving you a chance raccoon so don't blow it. My patience for people like you is about at an end.

    If the Canadian media is so good Monty why don't you know anything about what is really going on? Your just as duped as most Americans if not worse. You made me laugh Monty, the BBC! Really?😆 No significant truth ever comes via the BBC, for example they love to produce Vivisection propaganda, (Joan Bakewell springs to mind there) and are forever pushing the  AIDS hoax.  You can see all the tricks of BBC pseudo-reporting in Monopoly Media Manipulation by Dr. Michael Parenti. http://www.whale.to/b/parenti1.html Listen to the chatter of the radio 5 talking heads and you will get the idea.  Reporting Building 7 collapse before it actually had is revealing and proves they were in on the 911 Media Hoax.

    You are correct though in that Fox news is also a part of the problem. But for people leaning to the right Fox is about all they have. Most of the mainstream leans to the left. So if you are part of the left and right paradigm a person on the right will watch Fox news. A person on the Left has NBC,CBS,ABC,CNN, CNBC. There are however more radio talk shows for the right, left leaning talk show radio shows don't seem to last to long.

  15. On 10/28/2020 at 9:41 PM, RaccoonRanger said:

    The word you don't mention anymore is JOURNALISM... Now its just paid for "Media". We're so  inundated and constantly barraged by empty headlines about Covid, Racism, Trump BAD, and such nonsense, that a good amount of people actually believe it... They are unable to critically think, or choose not to, so as to avoid any social media repurcussions.. 

    Its a complete disservice to anyone with a cognitive brain. I disagree with you stating that Trump has alienated "normal thinking people".

    Great points RaccoonRanger! I am glad there is someone here that can actually think for themselves.

    I am having a hard time understanding how people this day in age with all the information we have at our fingertips can't figure out what the mainstream media really is. I guess the brainwashing and propaganda goes very deep. Then again, with all the censorship going on, it is even getting harder to find the truth. And if your a person that believes the mainstream media is all facts and never lies then I guess the truth will never be found since you think the mainstream media is the truth. You have to admit the Cabal has done a good job in getting people to believe in the mainstream media. I can't even stand watching them for more then 5 minutes. I don't even use google anymore because they are censoring all the information now also. I have to use other sources to even find the truth on things. There are some and you have to wonder how long that will last.

  16. On 10/28/2020 at 2:43 PM, Anchovyforestbane said:

    The truth is, the mainstream media is a friend of the people fervently dedicated to the facts. It's not their fault you don't see that and think that they are extremists when they are actually pursuing the truth in all avenues. They have been reporting for a long time, and those biased towards distrusting the media may think that the people uncovering and reporting the truth are extremists. The fact is all the distrust towards the media is nothing but a big conspiracy theory, and if you can't see that, that isn't my fault at all.

    If your logic, when reversed, is equally as true (which is to say, in this case, equally as ludicrous), there's a good chance your argument is flawed. 


    I didn't say that. A-wal said that. Don't go assuming some ideonomic alliance between us all of a sudden. 


    I meant exactly what I said. Should it have simply been a phenomenon of perspective as I've proposed, it would be foolish of you to assume I'm the only person on the planet who would've seen it, even if no astronomers with an ability to report the finding happened to be around that perspective point. 



    You seem to have a habit of not listening too well. Seems to be a consistent characteristic of yours. If you were paying attention, you'd have realized that the phenomenon was different the second time. This would make sense if, as I've proposed, it were a phenomenon of perspective.
    And it would sure be nice if you used this thread for exploring what that phenomenon could be, rather than exploiting it to quench your thirst for petty bickering. 



    You sure seem eager to end it on this notion of having fantasized the phenomenon which you're so steadfast in. Which is very strange, given that a few posts ago you insisted that you were not asserting that it must necessarily have been in my head. Were you simply saying that to cover your humiliatingly fallacious posterior, I wonder? Sure would make sense, given your recent behavior.

    Wow, are you confused.😄 What reality are you living in thinking the mainstream media is the friend of the people dedicated to facts?🤣 All I can say is wow! Unbelievable that there are still people that believe this. Are you kidding me? I think you better do some research not coming from the mainstream media.

    About a third of the whole CIA budget went to media propaganda operations. ...We're talking about hundreds of millions of dollars a year just for that.....close to a billion dollars are being spent every year by the United States on secret propaganda.


    Operation Mockingbird



    One of the most important journalists under the control of Operation Mockingbird was Joseph Alsop, whose articles appeared in over 300 different newspapers. Other journalists willing to promote the views of the CIA included Stewart Alsop (New York Herald Tribune), Ben Bradlee (Newsweek), James Reston (New York Times), C. D. Jackson (Time Magazine), Walter Pincus (Washington Post), Walter Winchell (New York Daily Mirror), Drew Pearson, Walter Lippmann, William Allen White, Edgar Ansel Mowrer (Chicago Daily News), Hal Hendrix (Miami News), Whitelaw Reid (New York Herald Tribune), Jerry O'Leary (Washington Star), William C. Baggs (Miami News), Herb Gold (Miami News) and Charles L. Bartlett (Chattanooga Times). According to Nina Burleigh, the author of A Very Private Woman, (1998) these journalists sometimes wrote articles that were commissioned by Frank Wisner. The CIA also provided them with classified information to help them with their work.

    We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New York Times, Time magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected the promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world-government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the National autodetermination practiced in past centuries.-- David Rockefeller in an address to a Trilateral Commission meeting in June of 1991

    "Media manipulation in the U.S. today is more efficient than it was in Nazi Germany, because here we have the pretense that we are getting all the information we want. That misconception prevents people from even looking for the truth." - Mark Crispin Miller

    I could keep going but I think you get the point. Or maybe you don't.


  17. On 10/27/2020 at 6:29 PM, montgomery said:

    And in which some people find reality doesn't serve their needs and so they turn to the supernatural for answers. 

    When the answer for Americans has been dangled before their noses for decades, but they refuse to accept the logical answer that they're slaves to the 1 or 2 %

    I think the same can be said for Canadians also. You are part of the same beast system.

  18. On 10/27/2020 at 12:10 PM, montgomery said:

    In some fairness to your theory on the media being propaganda, I suppose it could be termed as that. But first of all in my explanation I have to tell you that there is no cabal.

    All the mainstream media and some of the fringe media are biased against Trump. The reason for that is because their first and only priority is to sell advertizing to their audience. 

    Americans are indeed the tools of rich men, but they're not behind any socalled scenes. They're visible and easily identified. I'll explain again.

    The American way has failed the people because it's a system of greedy capitalism. The world's leading democratic countries are sprinting far ahead of the US with their 'socially responsible' kind of capitalism. There's a sensible explanation for everything you complain about and it doesn't need supernatural stories and imaginings to be able to understand.

    I've posted proof on America's poverty and declining 'quality of life' on this board but it's been rejected. The reason why is because the rich and powerful have consistently led the American people to believe that the ordinary people aren't entitled to a share of the enormous wealth in your country. Therefore, the label of socialism or even communism needs to be attached to every effort the people make to escape the slavery being imposed on them.

    If you want to discuss the issue you're going to first have to at least lay aside the 'cabal' and the other irrational explanations


    [quote]"The business of the journalists is to destroy the truth, to lie outright, to pervert, to vilify, to fawn at the feet of mammon, and to sell his country and his race for his daily bread...We are the tools and vassals of rich men behind the scenes. We are the jumping jacks, they pull the strings and we dance. Our talents,  our possibilities and our lives are all the property of other men. We are intellectual prostitutes."[/quote]

    They're just journalists and they have no power that hasn't been granted them by the people. Change the 'journalists' to 'the 1 or 2 % very wealthy and Swinton is nearly exactly right! And in fact he's within spitting distance of being exactly right because the employers of those who can call themselves journalists are among the 1 or 2% I've mentioned.

    It is not a theory and it is proven that the mainstream media is propaganda. Anyone with half a brain can see that. Not to mention all the censorship that is going on. It is all obvious that the mainstream media is totally for Biden. Biden can do no wrong and everything that Trump does is wrong. It don't take a rocket scientist to see that. In fact it can be said that the mainstream media is the virus.

    Monopoly Media Manipulation


    But this topic isn't about that. This topic is about aliens. You seem to want to go into threads and talk about everything else but what the topic is actually about. Try to stick to the topic Monty. If you want to talk about all the dribble you are spouting, create a new thread for your useless spouts.

  • Create New...