Jump to content
Science Forums


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

About TooMuchFun

  • Rank
    Advanced Member
  1. There are pathetically few people who post on this boring website that even the "Forum Administrator" has to chime in with his trite talking points. 1. You can't spell. 2. You can't respond to the scientific challenge presented. 3. All you can do is trot out your tired talking points handed to you by Richard Dawkins and other "brights" (sic), a one-word oxymoron. 4. No, a brick can't fly under any circumstances, and your inane quote is NOT a law of aerospace. 5. Trying to have a rational discussion with irrational atheists such as you is impossible and unproductive. 6. I see no point in r
  2. Not ONE atheist has so much as attempted to rise to the challenge to explain the original synthesis of even one, much less 100,000 polypeptides by naturalistic means. Not ONE. They call those of us they hate "nutters" and other petty pejoratives. How superficial and petty of them. Try explaining to me the selection of each individual chiral amino acid, 574 of them in all, in human hemoglobin. There are 20 amino acids. 1/20 x 1/20 x 1/20... 574 times. Richard Dawkins has defined "impossible" as 1 chance in 10 to the 40th power or less. The space of human hemoglobin dwarfs Dawkins defi
  3. I have scores more quotes like these by scientists: "Scientists who go about teaching that evolution is a fact of life are great con-men, and the story they are telling may be the greatest hoax ever! In explaining evolution we do not have one iota of fact.” – (Dr. Newton Tahmisian, Atomic Energy Commission.) “When you realize that the laws of nature must be incredibly finely tuned to produce the universe we see, that conspires to plant the idea that the universe did not just happen, but that there must be a purpose behind it.” (John Polkinghorne, Cambridge University physicist, “Science F
  4. In physical cosmology, the age of the universe is the time elapsed since the Big Bang. The current measurement of the age of the universe is 13.799±0.021 billion years within the Lambda-CDM concordance model.Wikipedia The universe is not infinite. Time is not infinite. I have not heard anyone mention the "unobservable universe" but many have squealed in delight about the "multiverse", not bothering with anything beyond absurd speculation based on atheist dogma. Your knowledge of statistics is manifest in your claim that anything with any infinitesimal probability is "possible." Mathemat
  5. In the letters of Richard Dawkins, "A>B>C>D". See how "simple" life is? Just alphabeticization.
  6. Listen carefully, emotionally overwrought Leftist.You CAN'T be a male, molesting little boys, UNLESS YOU ARE A HOMOSEXUAL, by definition.So if there were no homosexuals, there would be zero male pedophilia. All you Leftists have everything to answer for your ignorant, reprehensible, emotional "freak show." More facts, to make you spin and lie some more: “The physical sexual abuse of students in schools is likely more than 100 times the abuse by priests.” U.S. Department of Education report, 2002 ______________________________ Federal Report Says Schools Fail to Protect Students From Sexual
  7. Homosexuals are far more violent and prone to beat or murder than normal men. Homosexuals have a far higher incidence of depression and suicide than normal men. Homosexuals have a far higher incidence of molesting children than normal men. Homosexuals militantly parade down San Francisco streets, practically naked, mocking and ridiculing the Catholic Church in particular, and "straights" in general. So to you, a flaming Leftist, no there is "nothing to be in any way ashamed of." You defend such practices and no doubt murdering innocent, unborn babies as well.
  8. Nota bene: A-wal did not deny being homosexual. He just "wowed" it. Dead giveaway. What a waste of time responding to Leftists. Total waste. http://DemocratInsanity.blogspot.com
  9. Don't play semantic games with me, boy. You're clearly a Leftist who thinks clever wordplay is equivalent to being intelligent and rational. It isn't. You waste not only my time,but also the time of everyone.
  10. "We know the universe is finite... (BUT) If it is infinite...." You make no sense. You contradict yourself. You can't even spell "sheer" correctly. Nor do you understand statistics. Many times over.
  11. No you are not right. You were talking about BOTH water vapor and carbon dioxide. The former "falls out as rain." You are wrong in that claim for at least two reasons. 1. Water vapor doesn't "fall out as rain." 2. It's quite irrelevant since it is being continuously replaced. People desperate to uphold the lies and exaggeration of climate change priests say anything and call it science, even when it makes no sense.
  12. Water vapor is a gas. Rain falls, water vapor does not. Evaporation constantly replenishes the 1.5% water vapor in the atmosphere. Constantly. How long any molecule has been extant is quite irrelevant. They all work the same if they just arrived, or have been in the atmosphere for 1000 years. Science is hard. Try thinking before you posit something as inane as the foregoing.
  13. "If." The response of the Spartans to a threat. 1. The universe is NOT infinite. 2. It had a beginning, so time in the sense of this universe, is not infinite either. Not remotely. You have been listening to nonsense, with zero evidence and zero common sense and even less science to say what you said.
  14. You talk like a homosexual. "feel very dirty" http://ProofThereIsNoGod.blogspot.com Read and learn, "dirty" one.
  15. "That is simple"? You mean like winning the Lottery five times in succession is "simple"? I'm very sorry that you understand nothing about statistics. You compare humans, in a modern laboratory, with some naturalistic manner of PICKING ONE PRECISE AMINO ACID AFTER ANOTHER, HUNDREDS OF TIMES. AND THEN FOLDING IT, PRECISELY. What is the mechanism you envision for all this Darwinian magic? 1. EVEN WHEN we have the blueprint for human hemoglobin, we STILL cannot synthesize it. It is that difficult WITH the formula. 2. Abiogenesis is not the subject, as one of your Darwinian friends pretend
  • Create New...