Jump to content
Science Forums

VictorMedvil

Members
  • Content Count

    3,551
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    112

Everything posted by VictorMedvil

  1. That is not true, how alpha males become alpha is practice I am telling you that it is not all about what they were born with, it is the information stored in their brain, having a Big Penis doesn't mean a thing if women view you as broke and without a job, like a friend of mine, he can still pick up women though but that is because he is a Pimp and knows how to attract women. Learn to embrace your inner pimp, and if that doesn't work impress women with a nice movie and dinner with your money, there are many ways to get panties constantly tossed at you. Women are simple creatures basically, th
  2. I recently bought 10 acres of land on Mars for commercial usage in the year 2050s to 2100s for a Fusion Power plant which will be the Carbon Fusion Reactor outlined in the thread. http://www.scienceforums.com/topic/30881-the-thorium-cycle-and-carbon-fusion/ Soon to be selling electric energy on Mars for 11 cents a kilowatt hour in the year between 2050 and 2100. What do you think about buying land on other planets, do you think the value of said land will go up in time? With the find of Water on Mars, I thought it would be a wise investment for the future, The water can be u
  3. That is my point, it missing details smaller than 100 Mpc, it obviously is missing the smaller details, where as String Theory does that and is still accurate to the Planck Length. It fails to accurately explain the time period of the BB singularity thus is invalid in describing the complexities of the interactions during that time, only far after the period of initial energy-mass in the universe.
  4. Polymath, Dubbel is right you have no idea what you are talking about it is definitely not a E8, E8 would have 248 root systems, I would imagine that your model has far less than 248 root systems thus cannot be called a E8 math equation unlike mine which has at-least 248 root systems to take into account. Here is about E8 math (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E8_(mathematics)) and lesser mathematical models cannot compose them they are nearly perfect and take in the full complexity of the universe, you are missing a few dimensions of complexity, There is far more to the universe then what you ha
  5. I am just telling you when you look at the equations it misses all the Quantum Effects that are needed when approximated the BB singularity, you lose things like Hawking radiation and virtual particles along with entangelement of particles and the exact pathways of the particles, it is like a giant blob you don't get the finer details, The FLRW does the same-thing it doesn't describe the actual universe like a String Field but rather an ideal universe. It is all idealized to be smooth instead of rigid like the universe actually is. I dislike views when it is an ideal fluid like many of Einstei
  6. The nature versus nurture debate has been going on for about 100 years if not longer basically, the conclusion that was come to about this is it is 50% genetic and 50% practice , if you are a bad public speaker you may not always be so if you practice the art of speaking a great deal, if you are a beta male maybe you should learn to pick up the ladies, and know what ladies like to make yourself more attractive, for instance, I have not always been this way but I am good with women, in my younger years I was bad with females, I just learned to be what women want. It is never that set in stone
  7. The LCDM takes them directly from the energy-mass forms of the particles as a fluid like EFE but are conserve because of the energy-mass are equal, which does not take in account external sources of energy which is a closed system but LCDM does have its flaws, it misses alot of the finer Quantum Details of the system, I would never use it on the BB singularity, there are so many models of the early universe which are better suited than LCDM for Singularities which the BB was. Secondly, LCDM model assumes a constant amount of energy equally distributed throughout the universe which is wrong, it
  8. I don't think being a spectator is expensive but if you are really interested I can bring you in as part of the team and just let you watch, I dunno how much admission is but I will be getting in free as a speaker as well as my company's spot for its example product, it may be like 500$ I am not sure, but it is the European Nanotech conference, I will be there both days, if you see the booth then say hi I will see what I can do about getting you in to the conference as a speaker's assistant or something. I am not even sure if I am going 100% yet, but I will probably be going if I get in as a s
  9. Well, I didn't see those datasets this is the framework I use for BB questions about cause because String Theory has generally been besides its anomalies been correct on particle formation and other things of this nature, plus remember I think that BH contain Wormholes when quantum entangled take it or leave it, which allow energy transfer between universe branes.
  10. That is not my opinion that is String Theory's on the reasoning behind the BB and Cold spots, that collisions with other universe branes happens causing a flow of energy in or out of the system based on the temperature of that brane that was collided with. Two Papers on Brane Collision https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0103239 https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0207140
  11. Ya, it could be that Dark Energy along with Dark Matter (Gravity) + Energy-mass (Gravity) = 0 the sum of the universe's energy being zero but the question in that still remains what caused the reaction that made the BB. There would need to be a cause to the reaction as Newtonian physics says, This sort of reasoning would still require a cause to the BB.
  12. The Truth is that the universe is not a closed systems we see evidence of temperature loss in the CMB,This spot is called the Cold Spot in the CMB which says that it had to have gone somewhere were possibly another universe brane which also is the answer to where the energy of the BB is from another universe. The Universe is not a closed system entirely most of the time it is but not always as it can interact with other universe branes which the interaction is currently unknown just that in the past it seems as if it had to have lost or gained energy in small amounts and possibly in large amou
  13. Secondly, I will be submitting a paper on Viral Nanorobotics to the book for the Conference, if anyone wants to publish any of their works in Nanotechnology this is a perfect chance to get it published in the conference book, If you want to be a Eposter , This paper is expanded information on the information I will be going over at the Conference itself. I will be preparing a brief overview of the paper which if you follow my posts on this forum, you that have read my works and will be familiar with already mainly about the production of Multivalent Synthetic Hybrid Lentiviral Vectors and the
  14. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r00wJsduoUc
  15. Interesting, Yes putting the Stem cells in blood basically would increase the shelf life as they are getting oxygenated, necrosis would not set in until later due to the cells still receiving vital oxygen during transport.
  16. Hello, I got a Invite to the European Nanotechnology and Materials conference Nanomat, I was wondering if anyone would like to come with me from this forum to Spain Jan. 28-29 for the conference on nanotechnology there will be exhibits put out by my company. If anyone is interested, they can help setup the exhibits and join in the conference. If interested message me back on this post, imagine it is like a Giant Nanotechnology Science Fair, Also I will be speaking at the conference about Viral Nanorobotics, along with 50 other of the most influential minds in Synthetic Biology and Nanotechnolo
  17. I want it closed because it is false information that Moronium is posting that may confuse people that don't know any better, The replies and how he handles them are also well beyond non scientific, moronium has just been posting random stuff that has nothing to do with the subject this thread should have been locked long ago due to way off topic.
  18. Medical Nano-machines Well basically for a Medical Nanorobot you need a RNA Oligonucleotide Synthesizer build into the nano-machine this will be used as messager RNA, The Microfluidics need to have filters to filter the chemicals input to do oligonucleotide synthesis, The Nanomachine will need to intake DNA Monomers from the cell. DNA or RNA Monomer Structure The Microfluidics will have to follow the pathway made of Carbon Nanotubes in a pathway the same as RNA Synthesizer to make DNA or RNA to change the cell built in Silica. The Chambers woul
  19. I have devised that making a Organic Immortality Nano-virus is not impossible but not getting done soon, I will be coming back.
  20. I am growing tired of talking about science again, I may be back but I think I am going to quit scienceforums again, and work on a Organic Nano-virus which will be a Multivalent Viral Vector that is like a inorganic machine like a Nanofactory, I will talk to you guys in a couple of months again.
  21. Ya, I cannot wait to have inorganic nanofactories, I commonly do experiments with RNA and DNA based equivalents of Nanofactories, I dunno I am bored polymath, I dunno what to do with myself anymore, This may be depressing but I am running out of stuff to talk about, I have burned through most of my material in the last year, I suppose now I am just waiting to make a Organic Nano-virus to make myself immortal then sit in a chair and watch the world decay around me in the 2040s forever...... That is the time period I am waiting for is the Technological Singularity then after that in 2050s the co
  22. Lol, I mean you actually have a chance at redefine physics unlike moronium, something called potential but moronium's arguments have no chance learn from this and don't make his mistakes.
  23. Well, Basically polymath you are trying to do what Moronium is doing in the proper way, some people say you are a crackpot other than that, you are fine, but I think you could be like Einstein unlike Moronium you use logic and are attempting to do it properly rather than arguments like, Lorentz and Einstein disproved of their own theories like Moronium. You use something called the scientific method something that has be woefully neglected on moronium's posts.
×
×
  • Create New...