Jump to content
Science Forums

VictorMedvil

Members
  • Content Count

    3,372
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    107

Everything posted by VictorMedvil

  1. Medical Nano-machines Well basically for a Medical Nanorobot you need a RNA Oligonucleotide Synthesizer build into the nano-machine this will be used as messager RNA, The Microfluidics need to have filters to filter the chemicals input to do oligonucleotide synthesis, The Nanomachine will need to intake DNA Monomers from the cell. DNA or RNA Monomer Structure The Microfluidics will have to follow the pathway made of Carbon Nanotubes in a pathway the same as RNA Synthesizer to make DNA or RNA to change the cell built in Silane. The Chambers would need to guide the biochemistry of Olig
  2. I have devised that making a Organic Immortality Nano-virus is not impossible but not getting done soon, I will be coming back.
  3. I am growing tired of talking about science again, I may be back but I think I am going to quit scienceforums again, and work on a Organic Nano-virus which will be a Multivalent Viral Vector that is like a inorganic machine like a Nanofactory, I will talk to you guys in a couple of months again.
  4. Ya, I cannot wait to have inorganic nanofactories, I commonly do experiments with RNA and DNA based equivalents of Nanofactories, I dunno I am bored polymath, I dunno what to do with myself anymore, This may be depressing but I am running out of stuff to talk about, I have burned through most of my material in the last year, I suppose now I am just waiting to make a Organic Nano-virus to make myself immortal then sit in a chair and watch the world decay around me in the 2040s forever...... That is the time period I am waiting for is the Technological Singularity then after that in 2050s the co
  5. Lol, I mean you actually have a chance at redefine physics unlike moronium, something called potential but moronium's arguments have no chance learn from this and don't make his mistakes.
  6. Well, Basically polymath you are trying to do what Moronium is doing in the proper way, some people say you are a crackpot other than that, you are fine, but I think you could be like Einstein unlike Moronium you use logic and are attempting to do it properly rather than arguments like, Lorentz and Einstein disproved of their own theories like Moronium. You use something called the scientific method something that has be woefully neglected on moronium's posts.
  7. Every-time I have posted, I posted the SR was right because of experimental evidence, I have tried to explain this to you like I dunno about 5 times, so I give up on you moronium, you are unable to learn, this is why I couldn't be a science teacher and am a science researcher I couldn't handle students that do stuff like you do. it is annoying and personally I am sick of listening to you babble on about things that are not relevant to redefining physics SR and GR are one of the pillars of modern physics and with your arguments of Lorrentz was wrong are very weak arguments without any scientifi
  8. No, this isn't a debate SR is correct and you are wrong, they have been trying to disprove SR for like 100 years and you are not going to be the one to do it, I told you how it works, this thread will be locked soon because you just keep repeating the same crap and get the same explanations back, there is no point in speaking to you, you have the inability to learn. SR is how it works since you reject SR, then please just stop speaking yourself until sanctus or buffy get on. needless to say all of your words are meaningless saying that Einstein or Lorrentz disproved of their own theory won't c
  9. Why isn't this thread locked yet, the amount of sheer stupidity. *gets a nose bleed from sheer stupidity* Message sent to sanctus, this time.
  10. Solved for C2 in L' = L0 (1- (V2/C2))1/2 then plugged that into the Schwarzchild radius equation Rs = 2GM/C2 making Rs = -2GMB((L'/Lo)2 - 1)/Vo2
  11. Well, 2GM/R = C2 then L' = L0 (1- (V2/C2))1/2 which makes L' = L0(1-((Vo2Rs)/(2GMB)))1/2 then solve it the other way around for the other version.
  12. Yes, but that only takes account the gravitational length contraction and not the movement, basically, I just reverse solved it for C2 then plugged it in dubbel, which takes account for the velocity of the object and gravitational length contaction.
  13. I plugged Length contract into Schwarzchild radius and Schwarzchild radius into Length Contraction across C2 Because VB = C being that C2 constant.
  14. In this case, you are correct it is going across a compacted medium which is the time-space being warped by the BH, the velocity also is changing the space as well compacting which hints the equation. In many ways like you say it is being double compacted but charge has nothing to do with it, the charge is still constant as the Flavour field is still intact making the same charges, but the quarks which carry the charge may have odd orbitals because of the change in time-space's geometry.
  15. I have a interesting equation for you then for length contact of a object within a BH's Event Horizon by fusing SR length contraction with the Schwarzchild Radius if C ≠ Vo and VB = C If C ≠ Vo and VB = C then -Vo2/((L'/L0)2 - 1) = C2 Then Rs = -2GMB((L'/L0)2 - 1)/Vo2 OR L' = L0(1-((Vo2Rs)/(2GMB)))1/2 I think that explains any objects within the event horizon of a BH's Space.
  16. That is interesting then that photons slow down their movement rate when in motion upon the axis that they are not moving in, but photons do indeed have a frame which is the Null Cone or Null Frame. Photons are always at a relativistic limit which is exactly at the fastest any particle can move their movement is the movement equivalent of a BH's gravity, basically at the limit of relativity actually BH pull things at near or at the speed of light which light cannot escape, which BH pull things at the Null Cone or Null Frame after hitting the event horizon, but in many ways light can be analogo
  17. Just like photons that are in motion a BH can slow down too, you are correct in saying the time for the actual particle interactions inside the BH will slow down, just as in spinning BH hawking radiation rate slows down due to the relativistic motion of the BH disk. It is very frame dependent I agree with Dubbel's assessment in this matter. Actually as BH get larger hawking radiation rates start to slow down due to this effect of increased mass along with more time dilation within the BH along with increased spin rate, which is counter intuitive.
  18. Sugar is the basic energy producer in the cell, no doubt would a sugar rush help to motivate older people to do things, I can say after I drink even as a younger person an energy drink with much sugar, I tend to be more energetic, this information is not new information which is why things like energy drinks that include mostly sugar are often on the market, Though, it is interesting that sugar also increases the memory skills of older people too, I suppose it is due to the neurons having more energy to blow by firing more often. It seems that indeed a sweet tooth is a good thing, interesting
  19. Well, you use Special Relativity to find all of that, which is a proper theory to use in these situations. B is moving a .5c relative to you, is what it says and you are in a rest frame along with everything in the universe is also moving at their non rest movements, END.
  20. This thread will probably get locked, Case Closed your theory is rejected by around 20 forum members, Review of your theory is closed as Rejected. This is in the hands of Buffy and Sanctus along with the other admin team, now, which did not lock your thread last time.
  21. Yep, I tried to say this had failed peer view like a week ago, I know I am right. There is nothing he has said that would earth-shatteringly break SR or change the foundations of Modern Physics.
  22. Well, I can tell you I have been reading this thread quite a bit and I am willing to say as someone that does often make scientific inventions and models along with dubblel and polymath that your premise that SR is incorrect and does not accurately explain the universe is wrong and non-local going faster than the speed of light is impossible, Theory Rejected once again. I have had to do this to other threads and this has failed peer view.
  23. Science is always about proof without proof your arguments are void, it was a nice try Moronium but in the end the peer view committee has voted to reject your theory, sorry, it is not plausible that SR is wrong.
×
×
  • Create New...