Jump to content
Science Forums


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


VictorMedvil last won the day on June 14

VictorMedvil had the most liked content!

About VictorMedvil

  • Rank
    The Human Shadow

Profile Information

  • Gender
  • Interests
    Nanotechnology and Video Games

Recent Profile Visitors

3,588 profile views
  1. I was thinking about the prospects for human civilization with the idea that democracy along with Chinese Communism doesn't really work as a mode of government that is not corrupt with people constantly fighting for leadership. I consider that a global dictatorship would be the best mode of government as to keep control over the entire planet, one strong leader, that can rule the entire planet with a powerful yet graceful position. This form of government would allow executive decisions to be made by one person with control over the planet for life suppressing rebellion and the other political
  2. So I was playing Endless Space 2 and I was able to extinct the Unfallen Civilization that was a Kardashev Scale 2 civilization at Turn 268 by using my fleet of 3 planet destroying Carriers using the "Core Cracker" weapon. I was wondering is it actually possible to extinct a many planet civilization around dozens of stars in real life or is this just fantasy put forward by Endless Space 2's mechanics? Turn 218, my Civilization Blowing up a colony of the Unfallen. Turn 218, A Warning from my Allies Turn 268, The Extinction of the Unfallen being a Kardashev Scale
  3. Sorry, let me change the phrasing of that, "Would you kindly go and **** off".
  4. Good Luck better get on that. Though if someone else funds something you will get pennies on the dollar for your work. I was never happy making pennies on the dollar for anything so I do things myself and don't ask for money from anyone unless I am selling something. Just don't use anything that I have designed and I don't care what you do.
  5. Well, I don't really give a **** how it's done, I did it the way I did it because I thought that way had the most evidence of being correct and ease of doing it. If you have a different method that works then go for it.
  6. Well and I'll be frank I don't think you can actually do it, by my methods I know it can be done. If you do it then that's great I don't give a **** as long as it's been constructed and sitting there. I always get ****ed into doing everything anyways it would be great not to have to do anything.
  7. No, I mean literally build it I would add it to my collection of exotic devices.
  8. That's fine I don't really care how you do it then build it! It's just like I told the dude in the YBCO Synthesis thread(https://www.scienceforums.com/topic/36798-synthesis-of-ybco-superconductor/), ****ing build it then.
  9. For Non-Organic Nano factories all you need is something that can draw on a scale less than 1 nm but unfortunately there are no devices that can make something smaller than 5 nm. I am waiting for technology to catch up for that one, but the organic nanobots/organic Nano factories have already been created, all that requires is a oligonucleotide synthesizer. They have been built and are sitting in a safe in cold storage. All a Von Neumann Probe would need is Nano Factories to build the spaceship, 1 Nano factory turns into trillions over several replication cycles then constructing it. None the
  10. This Thread has been corrupted and is deemed ripe for destruction by the (https://www.scienceforums.com/topic/36136-building-a-supermassive-black-hole-dyson-sphere-continued/) thread.
  11. This Thread has been corrupted and deemed ripe for destruction by the (https://www.scienceforums.com/topic/31185-1000x-neutron-bomb-planet-killer-device/) thread.
  12. This Thread has been corrupted it is ripe for destruction by the (https://www.scienceforums.com/topic/34375-nano-factories-discuss/) thread.
  • Create New...