Jump to content
Science Forums

tonylang

Members
  • Content Count

    0
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by tonylang

  1. Superposition vs Entanglement. The LINE hypothesis proposes that a particle in a state of superposition is a single particle in this space-time entangled to metamatter in the Hilbert-space called the metaverse. In superposition, the particles’ degrees of freedom (DOF) are continuously instantaneously shared or teleported between it and its entangled metamatter. This sharing manifests in this space-time as the particle existing in multiple states simultaneously. Collapse of any superposition state involves disentanglement of the particle from its entangled metamatter via foreign inf
  2. A wave is very much Higgs constrained. The Higgs field not only induces relativistic mass to waves of baryonic particles but also informs the maximum universal speed limit which is the speed of waves of massless bosons like the photon (light). The necessary foundation needed to interrogate ideas such as the LINE hypothesis or Max's ideas or relativity and evolution requires a strong prerequisite grounding in the sciences, physics and cosmology by any means.
  3. Assuming such 'dynamic patterns' can arise where possible throughout this universe, without travel , ergo is not Higgs constrained, what prevents the duplication of your 'dynamic pattern'? Such duplication would simultaneously instantiate multiples of you in this universe ? How is your dynamic pattern monogamistic throughout space-time. If you agree that only one of you can exist at one time then this pattern must enforce only a singleton instance of you. This is the role of death, to live you must first not be alive, because there can be only one of you in existence at a time. This is the mon
  4. Max's ideas or indeed any plausible description of local phenomena or conditions or of universal physics that is in fact viable for the implementation of living host forms is welcomed by the LINE hypothesis. However, what is missing in all this is you. What is necessary to instantiate each instance of your specific presence here and elsewhere. The questions addressed by the LINE hypothesis is; What is it that most fundamentally defines you in nature? Not ones current species. How is that similar or different from what defines me whether I am instantiated on earth along with you or far awa
  5. The thought experiment in the original post of this thread "The LINE Scenario; Earth is gone..." is meant to challenge ones Earth and human centric mentality. It is meant to guide nimble minds to realize what is empirically necessary to define and implement life and individuality throughout this vast universe and in nature writ large. The LINE scenario forces one to acknowledge that in this accelerating, expanding, Higgs constrained universe, the vast distances separating viable habitats for life cannot be bridged by matter or by electormagnitism or by any classically mediated phenomenon.
  6. The significant conclusion being proposed is that individuality brings no sentience, nor consciousness, no awareness, no intelligence, no senses, only ones temporary positions in space time. Such advanced features are only emergent features of complex hosts, species. NASA is not looking for people, fish, insects or any multicellular organism on Mars or in Venuses' atmosphere, but they are nonetheless looking for life. Nature implements no significant distinction between one viable host form and another. What can evolve may, and such viable hosts become candidates to instantiate any individual
  7. Form what you are saying It appears that you only need to think on this a little longer to see the reality of it. The LINE hypothesis describes the position of view (POV) as the natural teleportation channel established by each living entity via the coherent interaction between the hosts' entanglement molecules with metamatter. The POV establishes a singleton space-time position, an eigenstate of information. That is, an antenna state which defines individuality, a temporary claim on territory which, for each lifetime, defines ones presence in whatever forms are available in any given vi
  8. At first the comprehension that ones’ first person individuality is abstracted, separate, and distinct from the evolution, development, and life of ones’ cells is a tough hurdle for the mind to overcome, even for Max. Even as it is viewed from various perspectives, and in the absence of clarifying empirical evidence, it requires some time alone in contemplation and a steely objectivity to come to realize the truth of it. However humankind has had this problem before. It is essential to recognize that maintaining life and maintaining an emerged individuality are both essential but separate
  9. The endeavor is to identify and locate the subjects’ hypothesized entanglement cells via a systematic decremental process of targeted termination of candidate cells within the test subject (i.e. fruit flies), and thereby to finally terminate a healthy subject by destroying only the subjects’ entanglement cells, while inflicting no damage to the hosts’ non-EC cells, ergo death without damage. Today all death known to modern science is eventually forensically caused by cellular damage to structures singularly or collectively vital to host function. Such damage can invariably be determin
  10. This is interesting material, thanks. The fine line required in the proposed search for the entanglement cell (EC) in complex hosts is subject death without damage. That is, the requirement that genuine EC disruption must not cause any other damage or systemic disruption premortem. There are a great many structures that if disrupted will perpetuate death of the subject but only by its cascading damage causing failure of other essential systems and structures which together all contribute to subject termination. Likewise the criteria for genuine entanglement molecule (EM) subject termination wi
  11. Interesting...So would MT pass the proposed test of Posted October 26, 2017 (edited). That is, if you disrupted or even destroyed the MT in a living cell or organism, conceivably might that isolated action alone terminate the subject?
  12. This line of thought sounds promising in its direction. The instantiating mechanism must be available to all life that may emerge in this universe not only within earths ecosystem. Keep in mind, the electromagnetic spectrum cannot be the basis for the non-local mobility of individuality because it does not possess the monogamistic qualities required as does the QE spectrum.
  13. The LINE hypothesis suggests that if earth fell into the sun this afternoon, any instantiated (living) individual position-of-view (POV), like you or I or your pet lobster or any living cell, by the laws of physics of this universe, could at some point, find oneself probabilistically reinstantiated (born) to any other viable environment in this universe. Instantiated to that habitats indigenous living host forms (species) just as each individual was previously instantiated to viable forms here on earth. This is so even if the earth is at present the only living ecosystem in this universe. One
  14. Every attempt to describe life and individuality that I've come across misses or ignores this question; How can life and individuality be defined within a single living cell as it must be within all emergent composite multicellular beings such as a human or any other living entities throughout this universe? This is the hard problem of life and individuality. The hard problem in understanding fundamental life and individuality is addressed by the LINE hypothesis in recognizing that life and individuality began on Earth some 4 billion years ago in the first living proto-cells. At that time
  15. These are very interesting and potentially relevant thesis since the LINE hypothesized entanglement molecule (EM) may very well describe a new or unfamiliar state of an already familiar molecule. After all what are states of matter except the emergent dynamics of molecular electronegativity and valence potentials etc. While our perception of the emergent physical state of the EM is interesting on some level, it is in the functional position eigenstate that is the antenna state called the POV that the EM instantiates and maintains for a lifetime that is most significant. Moreover, the on
  16. Thanks for the interesting guidance. The search is not for any particular host or species construction mechanism, but rather, for the entanglement molecule (EM) which instantiates ones position of view, your presence within whatever host form you may have. The EM is hypothesized to be a primordial arrangement of atoms which naturally establishes a shared information state, an entangled state with a form of matter which exists outside of this space-time, in Hilbert-space. The EM is made entirely of baryonic matter and is the Alice of this entangled pair. The EM, properly implemented in living
  17. Natures possibilities for hosting individuality is varied and untold. The specific mechanisms by which current life on earth functions is important for us to understand, however the necessary revolution in self perception required for the survival of humankind lies in understanding the universal mobility of individuality. To date the most promising structure yet discovered which displays some of the features and function consistent with those predicted by the LINE hypothesis for the entanglement molecule (EM), while perhaps falling well shot of complete equivalence, is the Fenna-Matthews
  18. Microbiomes are fundamental to the LINE hypothesis. The Cambrian Explosion; The Cambrian explosion is one of the great mysteries of evolutionary science today. It marks the sudden emergence of complex species from a significantly microbial ecosystem with little evidence of corresponding intermediate evolution in the fossil record. To shed light on this conundrum, we need to view the Cambrian through the prism of the LINE hypothesis to understand what effect does living have on the individuals' prospects for life after death. This will be a central question for all sufficiently devel
  19. How is my ancestry a delusion? Human acknowledgement of a connection with past individuals can be a largely positive tradition that can be quite beneficial when properly motivated and recognized. The problem is, the erroneous filters that human cultures have always placed upon this recognition. Poorly understood and conceived physical features of one’s current host form are chosen as demographic identifiers and categorizations that are used to recognize past groups and individuals as being one’s ancestors. This is done with no realization that what you are now, one’s current host form, is c
  20. Nature implements life by the same fundamental mechanism no matter the host form or its' position in space-time . In nature, this sort of scalable, extensible implementation is the very definition of simplicity. The LINE hypothesis suggests that It is the entanglement molecule that fundamentally establishes and maintains all life via natural entanglement in every living cell. One QE connection at some unique QEF is one individual. How this QE connection is established or maintained, composite or not, is irrelevant to natures design. Earth-life offers one (carbon-based) approach to hosting natu
  21. The only life that has ever existed on Earth is the living cell, in all of its forms. The aspect of being and individuality had by a single living cell is that which defines all life, no more and no less is required. This aspect, which instantiates the first person being of a single cell as a living individual every bit as alive as any multi-cellular creature, is the position of view (POV). All of the skills and talents that tend to distract from this fact are only emergent features of the host form. Beneath it all is ones' POV. In this universe, there isn't one implementation of life for mam
  22. The Ancestry delusion; Humanity has long been shackled by a debilitating crisis of identity ever since it began its staggered climb out of the animal kingdom. To finally counter this crisis and the systemic dysfunctions it manifests, cultures must first counter individual prejudice. What acknowledgments must occur within human minds to combat such identity-related dysfunctions? The solution, it is believed by most, is a reckoning with numerous relevant culture-specific historical narratives, true or false. This belief is due to individuals’ acceptance of an identity-defining connection b
  23. To conquer the heavens, technology is not enough; Human social dysfunction, today and historically, is a direct result of accepted false narratives about life and individuality of both a religious and secular nature. These erroneous ideas lead individuals to accept one’s current host DNA demographic history as one’s personal history. To most, this makes complete sense. Indeed, what else could one’s history be? It is certainly true that events which become history is executed by individuals that are instantiated to living hosts as are we. Moreover, if what one sees in the mirror will defin
×
×
  • Create New...