Jump to content
Science Forums

scherado

Members
  • Content Count

    188
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About scherado

  • Rank
    Questioning

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Southeastern NY State, USA
  • Interests
    Critical Analysis, Referent analysis, Ephectic; The ultimate questions: Origin of life on Earth; Life off Earth; Political Philosophy Constitutional Conservative, Inalienable Rights.
  1. . I expected the self-identified graduate of Berkeley to defend Antifa. . . How about Capeesh? . . Have you read the book? I recommend you think carefully before you answer. I await your answer.
  2. . . Let us begin...to "separate the men from the boys." (I will post, later, some detail on the error of "you are what you eat" so-called truism.) The first thing is that I change the "2+2" part of the "claim"; let's allow "2 + 2" to be substituted with "1 + 3" (or 3+1). The reason is to remove the irrelevant (and erroneous) impression of symmetry between the operands. The putative logic that is associated with the appeal to "2 + 2", must apply generally--no one would assert that the logic applies only for the natural number '2'; therefore, we can use x + y = z, where all are of the se
  3. You did it!!!!! You are now on my ignore list! Congratulations!! (That's pretty funny...
  4. . If you want to tackle Philosophy, then you begin with Plato's Republic and work from there. While there, you meet Aristotle. If you want to get aquainted with Philosophy while pursuing Physics, then you start some other place. Perhaps, someone else can recommend that starting point. I do believe this to be a better answer than my previous. Good luck to you in your decision. (I did the first route.)
  5. Reading and comprehension are two very different things. . Thank you "Farming guy". You've given an example of what I meant by this: . . I thank you.
  6. . The first thing of which I approve, actually second. I was going to move that here myself and I thank you for relieving me of that. Further, I had no intent and wish to "hijack" to other. Isn't that funny. -------Added---------- I just took a comprehensive look at what you moved. I had not intention of moving my recommendation to the new member of reading Nietzsche for HIS explicit philosophical interests. You should be relieved of your responsibilities I am now going to report your actions. ---------Added--- Here is the exact text in my "Report" submission; "this post"
  7. . The Nunes document linked below and linked in posts above and which you have hung your hat, precipitously, does not mention the name "Powers". Before anyone views that document, again or for the first time, notice the list of names on the top-left margin and the two names on the top-right margin--26 name, I think. One must assume that they all have given their imprimatur with respect to the contents of the document. Our very own Admin "Buffy"--yes, that's the name she uses, does not find this adequate. Ok. From page 2 of the Nunes document . . Further, I think that I read above in her
  8. . Do you even know what actually happened? Did you assert in the above that Powers' requests were approved? I thought they were requested but not approved. Do you know differently?
  9. . I had the post of yours you deleted in it's entirety--for good reason--but I deleted it and went back to find it gone. Lucky you; prudent decision--and I don't have to type a response, praise the lord. The Agnostic "speaks."
  10. . I do recall, though I'm having trouble finding, your post in which you comment about the pencils into my ears. When I read it, I thought, how ridiculous! if I stick them into my ears, then I will still see the repetive fatuity: I ought to stick them into my eyes! . . In my defense, I forgot the monumentally inappropriate name for the "stiff-arm", bust-heads operatives of the modern Democrat Party--not dissimilar to the well-known Brownshirts whom Hitler employed to such great result--except the mid-20th century infamous version showed their faces. I acknowledge my mistake and you may
  11. There is one other thing that one most definitely needs to know about USA politics, present-day, is that of the two candidates nominated to run, in fall of 2016, by the only two parties that had a chance of winning, both candidates, Clinton and Trump, were under Federal investigation!: Clinton for the server/email accusations and Trump....for what exactly?, that is the subject of the previous administration's use of Samantha Powers to unmask hundreds, the subject of the OP and, we all should believe by now, in an attempt to derail the potential Trump Presidency. This borders on insane and m
  12. . . Let us begin...to "separate the men from the boys." (I will post, later, some detail on the error of "you are what you eat" so-called truism.) The first thing is that I change the "2+2" part of the "claim"; let's allow "2 + 2" to be substituted with "1 + 3" (or 3+1). The reason is to remove the irrelevant (and erroneous) impression of symmetry between the operands. The putative logic that is associated with the appeal to "2 + 2", must apply generally--no one would assert that the logic applies only for the natural number '2'; therefore, we can use x + y = z, where all are of the se
  13. . Yes, I understand. It was with that understanding that I gave the 1 through 4 summary of the possibilities and it was with that understanding that I gave you my reasons for not being inclined to speculate about far-flung possibilities: stating them in a list is not speculating about their truth-value. Now, I hope, you understand my position and reluctance to participate in speculation that requires monumental assumptions about tentative and tenuous evidence. If you wish to address such things as the profound implication of finding our solar system devoid of any life off-earth, then I w
  14. . I can tell you that I've read all works that were published prior to his death--this excludes the posthumous Will To Power--none in German, only English and some in multiple translation and none that can be called second-party analysis, which would be considered somebody's comprehension of the originals. I gave a hint as to whether I comprehended in a post to pertogoogalog-aba-daba-doo regarding the three types of history enumerated in the essay that goes by the title translated by Adrian Collins, The Use And Abuse Of History, link to ==> post in "History Is Bunk
  15. If I understand your OP, then a summary might be: 1. All life on earth--each and every element and instance of it, all the matter associated with it--has been "converted" into a form that can be stored elsewhere in the solar system 2. There is and are "systems" outside our solar system--let us call them planets--which are "capable of Darwinian life"--(your words, the asside question being, what is "Darwinian life" and how does it differ from any other life?)--and such planets host reproducible organism which may possess congnitive abilities not dissimilar to the type we possessed--we are
×
×
  • Create New...