Jump to content
Science Forums

deschoe

Members
  • Content Count

    61
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  1. obviously the cat has got the tongues of CraigD, exchemist, farming guy, pzkpfw and ocean breeze, so I want to determine for other readers, that moving a mass in a horizontal direction ( acceleration + deceleration of the mass ) means no physical work was done according to the correspondingly energy balance, as I claimed, and the claims of exchemist, farming guy, pzkpfw and ocean breeze means nothing else than spreading nonsens inhere and especially CraigD hasnt the courage to admit this. _> http://www.scienceforums.com/topic/29866-where-does-the-energy-come-from/page-8?do=findComment&a
  2. obviously the cat has got the tongues of CraigD, exchemist, farming guy, pzkpfw and ocean breeze, so I want to determine for other readers, that moving a mass in a horizontal direction ( acceleration + deceleration of the mass ) means no physical work was done according to the correspondingly energy balance, as I claimed, and the claims of exchemist, farming guy, pzkpfw and ocean breeze means nothing else than spreading nonsens inhere and especially CraigD hasnt the courage to admit this. indeed this means, that the energy balance according to http://www.hwcv.net/s/cc_images/cache_24413981
  3. @D if it isnt too much work, it would be nice, if you calculate for the guys inhere the energy balance to this mechanical equipment, because this is the actual object of contemplation : http://www.hwcv.net/s/cc_images/cache_2441398170.gif?t=1390826553 , you see the cubes at first moved in horizontal direction ( red arrows ) and than they fall/rise. the horizontal movement is done by springs according to the book example. the falling/rising is caused by gravity and buoyancy. the cubes weight is 0,0135 g and they fall/rise 5mm. you can neglect friction you can calculate the rise/fall of th
  4. @D of course, the spring performs work, but the other spring "catches" this work. that wasnt the question. the question is ,do you have to perfom mechanical work ( which has a negative effect on the energy balance ) moving mass in horizontal direction according to the upper example. exactly, what does this moving ( acceleration + deceleration ) mean for the energy balance ?
  5. ok, lets ask Craig ! http://www.scienceforums.com/topic/29875-has-physical-work-to-be-done-to-move-a-mass-in-a-horizontal-direction/?do=findComment&comment=345008
  6. @D would you please be so kind and explain farming guy, that horizontal movement means no physical work is done ( by neglecting fricton ). because he thinks your statement says something different ( quotation : Posted Today, 12:00 AM Did you not read the answer to which you refer above? I suggest that you read it again, and visit the link that Craig posted. ) http://www.scienceforums.com/topic/29866-where-does-the-energy-come-from/?p=345006 and also pzkpfw paraphrase, your statement says that you have to perfom mechanical work ( which has a negative effect on the energy balance ) to mov
  7. ask Craig by PN, but please stop this borring posts. Craig told everybody inhere, that horizontal movment means no physical work !!!
  8. @ex, farming and ocean and after clearing, that horizontal movement means no physical work, again my question for you boys : Where does the Energy come from ?
  9. thanks @MrD -> http://www.scienceforums.com/topic/29875-has-physical-work-to-be-done-to-move-a-mass-in-a-horizontal-direction/
  10. here the question according to http://www.scienceforums.com/topic/29866-where-does-the-energy-come-from/page-8 . you see a book on a table, that is accelerated and decelerated by springs. these book was moved in a horizontal direction and farming guy, ocean breeze and exchemist claim, physical work was done, even if one neglect friction. you can see that on the left picture you have a book motionless lying there, and one tentioned spring and one relaxed spring, after moving the book, in the picture on the right site you have a horizontal moved book that is motionless lying there and
  11. nonsens doesnt get better if its repeated and repeated, here an example that shows, that horizontal movement doesnt mean physical work is done. ex, farming and breeze know exactly, why they refuse to make the calculation. if any reader herein wants to know whats going on, ask this three guys, why they refuse to make these calculation, on the other hand you can see that on the left picture you have a book motionless lying there, and one tentioned spring and one relaxed spring, after moving the book, in the picture on the right site you have a horizontal moved book that is motionless lying
  12. after removing this topic to where the crows fly backwards because ocean breeze, farming guy and last not least exchemist claimed wired theories ( http://www.scienceforums.com/topic/29832-where-does-the-energy-come-from/page-7 ) the question is still unanswered so here the detailed explanation : Please let me know, why do you think this is compatible with energy conservation
  13. ok, but there is still the question, where does the energy come from, and now we have learned, that moving a cube in a horizontal direction means no physical work was done and for this you see a Pm in the video, because the cubes are only moved in a horizontal direction by hand. so as long as you dont name the source of energy, you have a violation of the CoE, because this is science, not faith.
  14. and i am still waiting where is the lost 1 W ? @breeze, guy and ex
×
×
  • Create New...