Jump to content
Science Forums

Pincho Paxton

Members
  • Content Count

    124
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation Activity

  1. Like
    Pincho Paxton got a reaction from belovelife in ' The Super Fluid Universe ' , A Conclusion From Cornell University' Scientist Grigory Volovik   
    The universe exists, and that proves that nothingness never existed. It is a test of intelligence. You either understand the answer, or you don't. That is a simple answer to me, but can be complicated for certain people.
     
    The Universe is infinitely old. It just keeps repeating Galaxies all over the place. Each Galaxy has its own age. The age of a Galaxy is more important than the age of the Universe. Equilibrium seems to be based on an error in current physics. The error I think is to do with physics having a zero point. Physics are rotational, and so never reach a zero point. Physics turn negative, and negative turns positive, it's not going to wind down.
  2. Downvote
    Pincho Paxton got a reaction from Turtle in A Possible Reason For Layers On The Crust Of The Earth   
    I'm not opposed to this idea. It's worth looking into. It is an idea that has been at the back of my mind, but the physics of the sediments are too hard for me to work out, so I never bothered with it. And like some of the other posters, I had doubts about it.
     
    So I give this thread a maybe.
  3. Downvote
    Pincho Paxton got a reaction from CraigD in The Psychology Of Knowing The Theory Of Everything   
    In 2003 I had a rough idea of the Theory Of Everything, and now I have worked on it for 9 years, and I want to talk about the way it doesn't really sit well in society.
     
    I have said before how Newton called Gravity a pull force, and this caused all of the maths from then onwards to use formulas that included a pull force. Gravity is a flow into negative mass, and so the action is always local, and not at a distance. The local action is a big change to how the physics work. Most of the maths that science uses is backwards.
     
    But why was it an artist who solved the TOE, and not a mathematician? And that is because the maths were backwards like I said above, so a mathematician had a terrible disadvantage when it came to solving the TOE.
     
    The responsibility of an artist to prove a theory, and prove that the maths is backwards is like hitting a brick wall. I got banned from most science sites. My own feelings towards scientists therefore became one of distaste. You can understand why. If scientists are supposed to be trying to solve the TOE, and ban the person that hands it to them on a plate, then scientists are religiously acting on a faith in a God. Their God is everything involved in their beliefs. Their maths, their Big Bang, and Relativity all combine to become their God.
     
    So my psychology firstly was pushed towards science as the enemy. So what I did was flood forums with example of my predictions for the future of science.
     
    I posted all sorts of things about bubbles of Dark Matter, because gravity is a flow force, and magnetism is an outflow force. So obviously the forces will meet, and that will create bubbles. I posted the Einstein's cosmological Constant was backwards. Anyway I posted entire threads about nature, and I figured that time would pass, and my threads would eventually be proved true, and scientists would then listen to me.
     
    My threads were proved true, the forum members however were not interested. I was still banned with my theory currently surfacing in science. So science is an even greater enemy.. psychology.
     
    So a mathematician would have to reverse his maths in many places, so that isn't likely to happen. But the Cosmological Constant was finally reversed! Happy days. And now some mathematicians have worked on a negative mass scenario for Dark matter. Which means that the maths is starting to be turned around a bit at a time. Soon, my theory, and science will join up.
     
    What is it like to have the TOE in your head?
     
    I say that my intelligence is infinite, because the physics in my head solve a lot of things without me having to write anything down. You self teach, which I would like you to understand. I have physics from the first stage of the Universe, all the way up to biology. These physics work like dominoes. So you line up the dominoes, and when you want to learn something new, you just think about it, and the dominoes topple towards an answer. I call it the TOE abacus, and it's better than the current maths situation. With the maths backwards, and my brain forwards I work better than the maths. If a mathematician knew what I know he would be 100 times better than I am at perfecting the physics. But for now I am way ahead, even my guesses can beat the maths. I mean that my guesses about the unknown, invisible, and unmeasurable are quite accurate. For example, science measures the mass of an electron.. I know that the measurement is wrong, because the mass should be negative. Therefore all I have to do is put a minus sign on the measurement, and it is more accurate than science. This is part of the abacus, that you have the physics to correct the maths. The mathematicians have the physics backwards because Newton said the word 'Pull'. Some other things that helped me were that I am a Computer Games Programmer. My knowledge of creating physics in a computer allowed me to think in computer code. Some of the TOE in my head is in computer code. I'm an artist, and I study nature a lot, and I am classed as a genius through intelligence tests. One test said that I am a Mastermind.. I take that with a pinch of salt. I like to be right, and I like to store good information, so I avoid a lot of science like the plague. I avoid science because I know that the maths is backwards, I don't trust it. If I read up on science I have to fix it.
     
    So to round off. The psychology of the person that discovers the TOE has to be someone that goes against the grain. You have to face adversity, and still keep going. You are better off not being a mathematician. You gain a self teaching abacus in your head which allows you to increase your own IQ, which is amazing. You can imagine things much smaller than current Quantum Physics, you can imagine the things that make the Quantum Physics work. You can see time which is another interesting vision. You can see time before it becomes time.. pre-time, or negative time. And you can see the invisible Dark Matter that is all around us. You can see magnetism, electrons, photons, gravity, spacetime. You can understand psychology, and biology, and natures shapes, and pressures, and scalar factors.
     
    I solved the TOE, and the response is delusional. That just about sums up what it is like to solve the TOE.
  4. Downvote
    Pincho Paxton got a reaction from CraigD in The Topology Of Time, Or The Universe Or Something....   
    No that's an illusion created by the decimal counting system. A decimal counting system has ends. 1 to 100 has two ends, it starts at 1, and ends at 100. However every action has an equal, and opposite reaction, so a true counting system must have equal, and opposite ends. So a true counting system uses ring mathematics. 1 to 100 -100 to -1. Which now has closed ends. With closed ends you have no beginning, and you have no nothing, because nothing in a ring system is 1 + -1 = 0. Therefore you need two opposites to create nothing. Which would be two particles, one of matter, and one of anti-matter. The cause of the Universe is 1 + -1 = 0. Which means that the cause of the Universe is a ring counting system which starts with nothing, and nothing is actually two things combined.
     
    I never mentioned God.
  5. Downvote
    Pincho Paxton got a reaction from Moontanman in The Topology Of Time, Or The Universe Or Something....   
    The books? I have solved the Theory Of Everything, I don't need books, I have a TOE abacus in my head. Nobody believes me, but I keep proving it over, and over again.
  6. Like
    Pincho Paxton got a reaction from belovelife in A Possible Reason For Layers On The Crust Of The Earth   
    I'm not opposed to this idea. It's worth looking into. It is an idea that has been at the back of my mind, but the physics of the sediments are too hard for me to work out, so I never bothered with it. And like some of the other posters, I had doubts about it.
     
    So I give this thread a maybe.
  7. Downvote
    Pincho Paxton got a reaction from JMJones0424 in The Topology Of Time, Or The Universe Or Something....   
    The books? I have solved the Theory Of Everything, I don't need books, I have a TOE abacus in my head. Nobody believes me, but I keep proving it over, and over again.
  8. Like
    Pincho Paxton got a reaction from Algird1 in Space-Time-Matter-Energy Question   
    I don't know what science says about this. It happens in my theory, and it also happens as a bow shock in my theory as well. As this is in Alternative Theories I can probably add that the bow shock of a moving object scaling down spacetime gives a particle its directional memory.
     
    How does a particle have directional memory?
     
    It has a bow shock that scales down spacetime, and this bow shock becomes the area of least resistance and so each time step has a bow shock memory.
  9. Like
    Pincho Paxton got a reaction from Algird1 in Space-Time-Matter-Energy Question   
    A bow shock for all movement, sometimes quantum, sometimes huge. Imagine that the bending of spacetime is a gravity fold, so a bow shock would be a directional fold which is the area of least resistance per time cycle.
  10. Downvote
    Pincho Paxton got a reaction from Moontanman in The Topology Of Time, Or The Universe Or Something....   
    No that's an illusion created by the decimal counting system. A decimal counting system has ends. 1 to 100 has two ends, it starts at 1, and ends at 100. However every action has an equal, and opposite reaction, so a true counting system must have equal, and opposite ends. So a true counting system uses ring mathematics. 1 to 100 -100 to -1. Which now has closed ends. With closed ends you have no beginning, and you have no nothing, because nothing in a ring system is 1 + -1 = 0. Therefore you need two opposites to create nothing. Which would be two particles, one of matter, and one of anti-matter. The cause of the Universe is 1 + -1 = 0. Which means that the cause of the Universe is a ring counting system which starts with nothing, and nothing is actually two things combined.
     
    I never mentioned God.
  11. Downvote
    Pincho Paxton got a reaction from CraigD in Space-Time-Matter-Energy Question   
    I don't know what science says about this. It happens in my theory, and it also happens as a bow shock in my theory as well. As this is in Alternative Theories I can probably add that the bow shock of a moving object scaling down spacetime gives a particle its directional memory.
     
    How does a particle have directional memory?
     
    It has a bow shock that scales down spacetime, and this bow shock becomes the area of least resistance and so each time step has a bow shock memory.
  12. Downvote
    Pincho Paxton got a reaction from JMJones0424 in The Topology Of Time, Or The Universe Or Something....   
    No that's an illusion created by the decimal counting system. A decimal counting system has ends. 1 to 100 has two ends, it starts at 1, and ends at 100. However every action has an equal, and opposite reaction, so a true counting system must have equal, and opposite ends. So a true counting system uses ring mathematics. 1 to 100 -100 to -1. Which now has closed ends. With closed ends you have no beginning, and you have no nothing, because nothing in a ring system is 1 + -1 = 0. Therefore you need two opposites to create nothing. Which would be two particles, one of matter, and one of anti-matter. The cause of the Universe is 1 + -1 = 0. Which means that the cause of the Universe is a ring counting system which starts with nothing, and nothing is actually two things combined.
     
    I never mentioned God.
  13. Downvote
    Pincho Paxton got a reaction from CraigD in Light Exposure And Its Affects On Sleep   
    Well, if you want the opposite to a Blue Light effect then stare at a red light. In my theory, blue light is created by a positive flow, and red light is created by a negative flow. So basically, the opposite effects should result from a Red light. You could buy a torch like this...
     
     
    I used to stare at these torches in bed under the sheets as a child. Then I would close my eyes, and try to recreate the colours in my imagination. I could do it, and change the colour in my imagination to any other colour. It was very therapeutic.
     
    I think that it has some benefits.
  14. Downvote
    Pincho Paxton got a reaction from CraigD in Live After Death   
    Well firstly you presume that you have thought of all possible solutions to death. You haven't thought of all solutions. There are obvious ones like Heaven, and Worm meat, and re-incarnation.
     
    There are however some very physical solutions to death, and those physics are quantum, and therefore are hard to pick up by sensory equipment.
     
    Here is an option that works, and nobody has thought of...
     
    DNA is repeated all over your body. DNA is a series of holes, and each hole stores a pressure container. When you grow as a baby the pressure containers all open, and you are inflated like a balloon. You live your life, and each thing that you do is forced into a hole, and each hole holds a pressure container.
     
    Once you are fully inflated, you start to deflate. You become wrinkly like a deflated balloon. Your life deflates back into holes, and finally you go back into a DNA strand of holes. You are there along with all of your memories. The physics are all running in reverse, but that doesn't matter. The inflation of a balloon, and the deflation of a balloon both have energy that can be used. You can use that energy twice, a bit like a saw, when you saw wood, you can use the saw on the out-stroke, and on the in-stroke.
     
    Therefore a conclusion is that you can live your life whilst dead, using the life energy in reverse, and using the information that you have stored during your life.
     
    It is an example of ... you didn't think of everything!!! Worm meat isn't my first choice of physics. The Reversal of energy is my first choice of logical physics that science can not only use, but could actually find some day.
  15. Like
    Pincho Paxton got a reaction from Rade in Perhaps Something Easier To Understand.   
    Yeah, all of it. Each idea in your post leads to energy storage, and I don't see how you are converting synaptic energy storage into mathematics.
  16. Downvote
    Pincho Paxton got a reaction from Doctordick in Perhaps Something Easier To Understand.   
    Yeah, all of it. Each idea in your post leads to energy storage, and I don't see how you are converting synaptic energy storage into mathematics.
  17. Downvote
    Pincho Paxton got a reaction from CraigD in Maybe Light Has A Preference For Red Shift   
    If a bunch of the ideas that you posted are wrong it is easy to manufacture science to fit what you want. For example the interaction with electrons in my theory is an interaction with scalar vortex, and time, and electrons don't really exist. But there is a point at their location of negative mass. QED is a square peg in a round hole, and the peg works with its jagged edges sticking out. Nobody notices the square edges until they get a look at them, and then all of a sudden everyone is confused that Quantum Physics isn't doing what it is supposed to do. I ignore such flippant use of QED.. electrons don't exist, QED doesn't exist.
  18. Downvote
    Pincho Paxton got a reaction from CraigD in Expanding Universe or, Shrinking matter?   
    Relative to zero.
     
     
    It's creating time, gravity, magnetism, and energy from matter.
     
     
    Are these questions, that I am not supposed to answer? I get confused when science asks questions then bans me.
     
    If I am not supposed to answer, forget the above.
  19. Downvote
    Pincho Paxton got a reaction from CraigD in Life And Water   
    Science isn't ready to know why life requires water. The answer doesn't gel well with the standard model.
     
    Say if my reply is true, how is anyone able to post an answer?
×
×
  • Create New...