Jump to content
Science Forums

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation since 01/10/2021 in all areas

  1. It seems that there have been reports that the Wuhan Lab Staff were the first victims of the COVID-19 virus as the investigation continues, read more at https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9155237/US-claims-researchers-Chinese-institute-fell-ill-weeks-world-knew-Covid.html P.S. This is just the first evidence that China was the source of this pathogen as the investigation continues, we will all find out the truth.
    1 point
  2. Hi Sluggo, Now that you mention this, the original paper for SR (that I linked before) is actually quite nice in that it doesn't really suggest any particular ontology (like Minkowski spacetime), but the reader must be careful to understand it as merely drawing purely logical connections between definitions when reading it. Nowadays people read it with Minkowski's interpretation in mind and tend to take SR as literally an argument for "Minkowski spacetime", even though it doesn't mention such thing anywhere. This misconception leads exactly into my original complaint about people locki
    1 point
  3. Since you still haven't told us what YOU mean by "physical consistency"- and seem to be using this board to rant about things you do not know, I'm not going to bother responding any more. This is "science forums" and you do not know what "science" is.
    1 point
  4. Okay, so what evidence do you have, or what reason do you have to believe, that time has a "physical consistency"?
    1 point
  5. Hi Sluggo I'm afraid your post exemplifies exactly the confusions I was complaining about in my long post. Look, it's very simple to convince yourself of this matter. The mathematics of Lorentz aether theory are exactly the same as using Special Relativity, but instead of transforming from observer to observer, you'd arbitrarily choose some reference frame, and then do all of your calculations from that frame. I'm sure you can trivially accept this as mathematically valid approach. You can always go back to this simple point, if you feel any doubt. If the above wouldn't work, th
    1 point
  6. I would appreciate it if you would define "time substance".
    1 point
  7. I think the last symbol should have been / for division instead of the percentage sign. Then it could be expressed in words as: “The four elements of this cardinal set of basic arithmetic functions are addition, subtraction, multiplication and division” But I’m not sure why anyone would want to do this?
    1 point
  8. For Chemistry Courses posted the order for the classes for a Youtube Chemistry degree goes as follows as these are the same courses you would take in your "Major courses". You would still have to take the classes in a classroom for a "real degree" but if you understand this material you would have the knowledge of a chemistry major's main courses for a bachelor's degree. Year 1 General Chemistry = http://www.scienceforums.com/topic/36663-lectures-of-general-chemistry-chem-111/ Year 2 Organic Chemistry = http://www.scienceforums.com/topic/36401-lectures-of-advanced-organic-chemistry/ Year
    1 point
  9. Victor, that makes absolutely zero sense. God obviously owns his own yacht.
    1 point
  10. Actually, we have a test for you me and four of my buddies came up with it. To believe you are God and not crazy able to make earthquakes which we don't care about that. We want you to have a person give us 1 billion dollars each being 4 billion dollars to a man named Dan. If you give us 4 billion dollars we will believe you are god without question as God this should be well within your power if you are able to make earthquakes. If you can see the future it should be not problem for you to guess the lottery numbers 16 times in a row then give us 4 Billion dollars to prove you are God. We will
    1 point
  11. WTF? was that all about I just was reading this and this guy is a moron.
    1 point
  12. And with that disrespect, you are banned. go pay to host your ideas and rants. For without the allmighty dollar you are never going to be in any power. :D
    1 point
  13. I have moved your insane rant to silly claims for the moment just to give you a chance to have your free speech. But I seriously doubt you will last much longer here.
    1 point
  14. “Could a person drown from steam in a shower?” is an interesting question. By the conventional medical definition of “drown”, the answer’s a clear NO. “Drowning” mean “respiratory impairment from being in or under a liquid”. The steamy air in a shower – a mixture of gasses, water vapor and droplets – isn’t a liquid, so can’t be the cause of drowning. If we broaden the definition of drowning to something like “respiratory impairment due to water in the lungs”, we can sketch some scenarios where a person might have respiratory distress, or even death, due to showering. I’ve noticed that
    1 point
  15. So South Korea have granted legal protection to 60,000 sadists after the Nth rooms. Not only did extremely few perpetrators receive lenient sentences, the rest were granted legal protection from the victims. Here's the puzzle; how long until we're all f***ed from corruption, idiocies and sadism? I mean at worst the whole 60k reproduces for a few years with probable victims and masses an army of sadists, 3 victims each 4 years 60k*3*3 plus the possible exponentials of them repeating this bs. That's the extreme end of it, but as you can see the possibility of this is rather unacce
    0 points
  16. "Under Einstein's theory of general relativity, gravity can bend time" What's posted is a very basic logical explanation of what this is an attempt at saying, since gravity comes from 3d objects as a whole and not just one part of them it's considered a pooling. I don't think this man a fool, I also don't think nuclear weapons are the most destructive conceptions of theirs either. But what I do know for sure is, the Nth room aftermath is blatant evidence of government corruption of the highest order and in most messed up regard, it's up to the smartest to F*** them off as I'm afraid eve
    0 points
×
×
  • Create New...