Jump to content
Science Forums

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 04/25/2019 in all areas

  1. I don't think you can classify someone as insane or mentally unstable over politics even though some try that route, I know I talk to Right and they think that Homosexuality and Abortion should get the Left sent to jail and as almost a sign of mental stupidity while when I talk to the Left they have this idea that the Right is a bunch of gun totting mass murderers that cause people to get murdered on a daily basis over guns, so I wouldn't put much stock in politics and mental stability there are those radical elements in both sides.
    1 point
  2. No problem about the title. Welcome to Hypography! I am not sure I understand your objection to other scientists refining the work of the "original" theorists. I doubt that anything is truly original and is always based on the work of those who came before. Science is not so much about giving credit, in my opinion; it is much more concerned in trying to reach a correct understanding of how the universe works. Again, just my opinion, and not meant as a criticism of your post.
    1 point
  3. At least our crackpots are not heavily armed.
    1 point
  4. Great post GAHD. To your point [researching the new knowledge that you presented] Physicsforum.com tells us: Fire can (and does) exist without the presence of oxygen. All that is required is a strong oxidizing substance. There are other substances, like flourine or chlorine that can be good substitutes for oxygen. So now, all we need to do is change my unifying framework of Fire to say: Fire is the side product of the reaction with oxidizing substance, therefore an oxidizer must be present in order to produce fire. Wallah! With your help I have developed a near perfect unifying framework
    1 point
×
×
  • Create New...