Jump to content
Science Forums

Mathematical Beauty


pgrmdave

Recommended Posts

Good question. I just recommended a book about that in the Christmas book thread.

 

Here is a review of that book:

http://physicsweb.org/articles/review/15/3/1

 

I think the "beuty" is related to "simplicity". It is all about finding the simplest way to explain something, and then wrap it all up in the shortest equation possible. Like E=mc2...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They would at least have less room for error since there would be fewer variables which could screw up the results.

 

But of course - any equation is based on assumptions that other equations are right. The entire mathematical language we use is based on basic assumptions which might turn out to be wrong...so I think simplicity rules because - that's the way it is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But of course - any equation is based on assumptions that other equations are right. The entire mathematical language we use is based on basic assumptions which might turn out to be wrong...

 

What assumptions? Could these assumptions be applied to the thread in Philosophy and Humanities > Philosophy of Science - physics eventually gets down to assumption and acceptance?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...