Jump to content
Science Forums

Merging Gr And Qm Across Reimann Curvature


Recommended Posts

I had a inspiration with how to merge QM and GR this time across the Riemann Curvature/Ricci Tensor, there was a previous attempt in the (http://www.scienceforums.com/topic/36198-merging-quantum-mechanics-with-general-relativity/)thread which the definition I used for the trace of Scalar Curvature in 4-D time-space was not accepted as exact enough, however I can use one of the exact definitions of Riemann Curvature and still merge them into a Quantum Gravity Equation.

 

First as always we started with the fundamental equation of quantum mechanics being the Schrodinger Equation then reverse solve it for = d2/dx2 + d2/dy2 + d2/dz2

 

 

Which 

b949bac25131eaca08d626812362ac03.jpg

Solves as -(2m(iħ(dΨ/dt) - VΨ)/Ψħ)1/2 Quantum Mechanics

 

Now for General Relativity the defintion of the Reimann Curuvature I will be using is

 

R(X,Y)Z = XYZ - YXZ - ∇(x,y)Z where X = u ,Y = v , Z = W

 

Now Einstein's General theory of Relativity is as follows

 

einsteinfieldeq.jpg

Now we must solve that equation for Ruv or Rxy which solved for the Ricci Tensor is Ruv = (8πG/C4)Tuv + (1/2)Rguv Λguv which is also Rxy = (8πG/C4)Txy + (1/2)Rgxy Λgxy Now we can take that entire equation and substitution that in for R(X,Y)Z  being the same as Ruv or  Rxy , so (8πG/C4)Tuv + (1/2)Rguv Λguv XYZ - YXZ - ∇(x,y)Z , now we must solve that for ∇(x,y)Z which is the same as saying ∇(x,y,z). then -((8πG/C4)Tuv + (1/2)Rguv Λguv YXZ - XYZ) = ∇(x,y)Z and also equals -((8πG/C4)Tuv + (1/2)Rguv Λguv YXZ - XYZ) = General Relativity

 

 

Lastly, General Relativity  Quantum Mechanics Quantum Relativity

 

Or

 

 -((8πG/C4)Tuv + (1/2)Rguv Λguv vuW - uvW) + (2m(iħ(dΨ/dt) - VΨ)/Ψħ)1/2  Quantum Relativity

 

or 

 

-((8πG/C4)Tuv + (1/2)Rguv Λguv vuW - uvW) + (2m(iħ(dΨ/dt) - VΨ)/Ψħ)1/2  = (d2/dx2 + d2/dy2 + d2/dz2)1/2

Edited by VictorMedvil
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stop using your crackpipe before posting plz

Unlike your theories which are clearly wrong, my equations are actually correct and make sense using proper mathematical definitions (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ricci_curvature#Generalization_to_affine_connections and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Riemann_curvature_tensor). That's what you don't understand physics isn't just a mixture of Star Trek and Star Wars, it is applying mathematics to physical phenomena from known definitions in mathematics and physics. Basically, I know it works as the mathematics definitions work, you can't just make stuff up and that's why you are a crank. This is why 90% of the equations on this site from cranks are useless as they use improper geometries and equations that flat out don't work and anyone with a mathematics or physics degree just laughs at them because they know that it is just incorrect.

Edited by VictorMedvil
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...