Defined x and t is for decoherence and the wave collapsed

**Edited by pittsburghjoe, 25 April 2020 - 12:08 PM.**

Started By
pittsburghjoe
, Mar 17 2020 06:57 PM

spacetime fabric of spacetime time spatial
135 replies to this topic

Posted 25 April 2020 - 11:43 AM

Defined x and t is for decoherence and the wave collapsed

Only the decohered/wave collapsed have access to spacetime. Age.

Everything I've ever said hinges on quantum waves not having access to spacetime.

**Edited by pittsburghjoe, 25 April 2020 - 12:08 PM.**

Posted 25 April 2020 - 02:12 PM

Is Time everywhere if it is possible for coherent/plane waves to complete their path without decoherence in flight?

Posted 25 April 2020 - 05:32 PM

Coherent light doesn't redshift

Only waves display quantum behavior

Posted 26 April 2020 - 09:14 AM

Fringes in the double slit were complex numbers starting at -1 and landing on a final panel at 0. The final panel is at half a mathematical sphere.

3D number example: 2.65 + 3.58i + 9.79j

Coherent waves are complex numbers being projected/mapped from a mathematical sphere to a circle.

Quaternion spheres are for spacetime. Coherent waves don't have access to spacetime so they are one step down. Quaternion example: 3.23 + 8.46i + 2.64j +3.38k. That extra number is the difference between coherence and decoherence. The whole equation becomes imaginary/coherent no real/scalar.

Could every wave collapsed atom be a quaternion sphere? Could black holes be generating enlarging quaternion spacetime spheres and atoms have to be inside it to wave collapse into mini quaternion spheres?

**Edited by pittsburghjoe, 26 April 2020 - 11:18 AM.**

Posted 26 April 2020 - 09:54 AM

Leave it to you clowns to put the most important thread ever in here

Posted 26 April 2020 - 09:55 AM

Golden ratio * X²⁺ⁿ / Pi = Spacetime scaling (the unit circle on the i,j plane)(0.1%)

Spacetime/Decoherence = Real #(Scalar) + i + j + k

Coherence = i + j + k

Decoherence or Wave Collapse = Real Number or Scalar + i + j + k,

Coherent Vector or Plane Waves = i + j + k, Does this bridge QM with GR?

Adding a Real Number (from Spacetime access) to a plane wave causes decoherence?

In the double slit experiment, a pure mathematical sphere, filled with every possible path the coherent vector wave could have, exits both slits. The two spheres interfere at the intersections of the possible paths?

Coherent/Plane waves are a wave of all possible paths.

**Edited by pittsburghjoe, 26 April 2020 - 01:39 PM.**

Posted 26 April 2020 - 05:48 PM

Maybe there isn't two separate spheres. Perhaps a single sphere has the whole experiment inside it.

Posted 26 April 2020 - 08:27 PM

Can spacetime be represented/described by quaternion spheres?

If nothing is real, do quaternion spheres (aka spacetime) project what we consider physical?

If coherent waves are virtually/mathematically every sensible path, is a double slit causing interference with possible paths?

**Edited by pittsburghjoe, 26 April 2020 - 08:47 PM.**

Posted 26 April 2020 - 10:11 PM

i + j + k is describing a mathematical sphere that coherent vector waves are aimed at the center unit circle on the i,j plane. We now have math for the unobservable side of QM.

Posted 26 April 2020 - 11:03 PM

I think I just figured out how unobserved waves can know if they will have a decoherence event in their path.

Every coherent wave has a math sphere using three points i,j,k. The sphere is what receives a real number variable to swap the particle before it starts to move.

Posted 27 April 2020 - 06:33 AM

Does an unobserved wave know it will have a decoherence event in its path by the mathematical sphere of all sensible paths? The sphere is receiving a real number variable to decohere the wave to a wave packet before it starts to move.

This clarifies pilot wave theory.

A second separate decoherence event in the path of a particle starts a new mathematical sphere. This is why a which way eraser has fringes.

Posted 30 April 2020 - 05:31 PM

Time is intrinsically decoherent and why it converts waves to physical objects.

Entropy is making it decoherent.

If entropy is the cause ..should I say Incoherent Time?

Does time have a wavelength and most free particles are too small to access it naturally? Is this the reason for the quantum/classical boundary?

**Edited by pittsburghjoe, 30 April 2020 - 06:58 PM.**

Posted 30 April 2020 - 07:44 PM

This explains how Time is not everywhere.

A virus seems to be right on the boundary so the wave is likely that size. It takes one femtosecond for light to cross a virus. I guess this means time propagates at the speed of light.

Posted 30 April 2020 - 09:34 PM

A frame of reference isn't abstract anymore. A speed of light distance in each direction gets you a real frame of reference.

Time, causality, and light are limited per frame of real reference.

It is a limit of waves and time.

If I can show waves are limited per frame of reference ..ill be in business

Posted 30 April 2020 - 09:46 PM

With the speed of light based on time, I can show time is limited by the same reference, and we already know light is a wave so... $$$

Posted 01 May 2020 - 01:14 AM

Last warning. Follow the rules.

Posted 01 May 2020 - 07:11 AM

The wave function doesn’t need time because time is the same speed as light.