Jump to content
Science Forums

The Conquest Of The World


Vmedvil2

Recommended Posts

Cool well then it just seems as if we need some trade agreements made and that would be the key to controlling the world's money. If someone could get taxes from the trade agreements between all the countries that would be a insane amount of money to fund projects and Military improvements.

Edited by VictorMedvil
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another possibility is to enact the New World Order, just putting it out there if anyone knows what that means...... Hostile Takeover!

We don't have to pussy foot around this there may be no peaceful solution, the best solution maybe to shoot and ask questions later, a dead man does not speak nor plot against you.

 

download.jpg

 

4556554825-7cc75e0626-b.jpg

Edited by VictorMedvil
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whats wrong with a bit of variety, cultural and economic diversity. A new world order could take an Anarchist philosophy, no government or world order, the average human does not like being told what to do. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anarchism . It seems to me that many of the worlds problems are caused by Patriotism, ie the perception of belonging to a country that has certain values. Whereas when we speak to people from other cultures we find people are the same all over the world. 

 

Muslims are nice people and very reasonable unless you mention you would like to eat pork to a chef in a Halal restaurant, in which case they can become a little unstable :)

 

Why do you think a world government or dictator would be a good thing????? EDIT World Conquest is not a new thing, Alexander the great conquered all of Persia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexander_the_Great long before America was born

 

Amidst all the smoke and mirrors of world politics and world banking we may already have a Quasi world government. Maintaining an economy on money, allows the world bank to control a countries economy, therefore the worlds bankers are in charge. 

 

The idea of a global dictator is a sound one it allows for one person to make the "Big Decisions" that others cannot, it would bring peace and stability to the planet which is much needed as it would cause one "Archon" to control the decision making process of the world tackling problems that single nations cannot and enact Laws along with policies shaping the world. The U.N. which is a sort of global government has no "real power" to influence people with this council of single nations approach often times the nations disagree about certain issues which the U.N. doesn't have the authority to resolve, with a global dictator controlling the planet these issues could be resolved by his authority. With the presence of a global dictator wars would cease to exist as there is one leader, one Earth government controlling the smaller "Nations" of earth the resources from the taxes collected by this Global Government could be used to complete the goals best suited for all nations of earth generally giving a positive effect toward all of Mankind, however it would require a Dictator with control over everything to complete as disagreement would be resolved by this leader directly, which would be the final authority in all matters. The Earth at this time is fragmented into sections all with their own leaders if there was only one leader, this global dictator, then there would be unity of the planet with one authority, not many small voices but one big voice allowing for change on a global scale rather than on a national scale. It would effectively end war on this planet along with generally be a stabilizing factor for everyone to know that there was a leader to moderate the lesser leaders with global authority.

 

Global Dictator("Archon")

images.jpg

Edited by VictorMedvil
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why must it be "conquer"?  What if each has something to offer, can see the possibilities and be willing to share?  Have you read Wendell Willkie's "One World". He had an idea but it scared the power-that-be" because one element was missing - the willingness to be "equal" rather than king of the mountain.  Is humanity ready for One World?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Exactly, but how could someone take over the world, Victor is perhaps keen on genocide :( . It might be easier and less messy to take over the worlds money supply or introduce an alternative that undermines the worlds economy, based on fair trade between individuals.

 

To make people equal are you thinking Communism. Communism has not really worked except perhaps in China.

 

 

A distant memory from school in George Orwells Animal Farm not all animals are created equal. 

No, I am not thinking communism.  This is exactly what went wrong with Wendell Willkie's idea.  He never once suggested communism but people took it that way.  Every country could still have it's own government and its own culture and other methods but all should work in common on world problems.  The same with world trade.  No country would be trying to bankrupt another country with high tariffs and such.  Each country would stay independent but all shared  equally.  No more fussing nd fighting to prove who is most powerful.  And yes, it is a pipe dream.  It's a pipe dream because we all seem to have an inborn urge to be in control. 

 

Sorry.  I only asked "why".  Why, Victor, would we have to take over the world?  But, of course, we "have to".  It was ever thus.  And we are witnessing it again right now.  Some day ........

 

Off the soap box.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...