Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Doesn't Anyone Question How Weird Our Number For Light Speed Is?

quantum lightspeed

  • Please log in to reply
11 replies to this topic

#1 pittsburghjoe

pittsburghjoe

    Understanding

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 433 posts

Posted 20 December 2019 - 11:30 AM

299,792,458 meters per second

 

I'm convinced it has to be this speed to allow a quantum/classical boundary. A Femtosecond holds the key of 0.3 micrometers. An object with this width is going to be auto-observed ..have a physical state. The speed of light is the speed it is in order for quantum events to occur. If it was any faster a Femtosecond could cover 0.2 micrometers and prevent quantum weirdness from being a thing. 

 

The speed of light is directly tied to the spaceTime and it seems to be a frame rate.

 

I suspect the default speed of light is actually 200,000,000 m/s and a multiplier of 1.49896229 is added to the frame rate to equal 299,792,458 m/s

Again, the multiplier is to ensure the quantum/classical boundary size.

 

If we take the speed of light and multiply it by 5 we get: 299,792,458 m/s x 5 = 1.49896229×10^15 Micrometers per second (1,498,962,290,000,000)
 
I think it is telling us 1,498,962,290 m/s is the speed of light when spacetime isn't involved.
 
The speed of light gets divided by 5. Is it saying time gets split between 5 different dimensions?
 
 
299,792,458 m/s x 5 = 1,498,962,290 m/s or 1,498,962,290,000,000 Micrometers per second
1,498,962,290,000,000 / 5 = 2.9979246e+14 || 299,792,460,000,000
 
I think this is saying the auto-observe key is actually 0.29979246 Micrometers

 

speed of light 299,792,458 / auto-observe 0.29979246 micrometers to meters 0.00000029979246 = 999,999,990,000,000
 
Light has a max of auto-observing 999,999,990,000,000 clumps of matter each second.
 
 
1000000000000000 - 999999990000000 = 10,000,000
 
I think that is somewhere around 1.00000001% of a difference.

Edited by pittsburghjoe, 20 December 2019 - 11:33 AM.


#2 OverUnityDeviceUAP

OverUnityDeviceUAP

    Hiatus for misbehaving.

  • Banned
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 458 posts

Posted 20 December 2019 - 11:38 AM

The universe vacuum is actually only dispersing at the speed of light, cosmological redshift off the vacuum artifact of the cmb is actually an optical illusion as we are in a 27.6 giga light year hubble diameter from one particle horizon to the other but are actually situated at only 13.8 bill ly from one of those horizons

#3 OverUnityDeviceUAP

OverUnityDeviceUAP

    Hiatus for misbehaving.

  • Banned
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 458 posts

Posted 20 December 2019 - 11:39 AM

Two galactic filaments approach one another at 6.4 billion m/s

#4 OverUnityDeviceUAP

OverUnityDeviceUAP

    Hiatus for misbehaving.

  • Banned
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 458 posts

Posted 20 December 2019 - 11:40 AM

https://www.google.c...sion-course/amp

#5 OverUnityDeviceUAP

OverUnityDeviceUAP

    Hiatus for misbehaving.

  • Banned
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 458 posts

Posted 20 December 2019 - 11:41 AM

60 squared = 3600

https://www.google.c...299.zuqtsFpkZUo

#6 OverUnityDeviceUAP

OverUnityDeviceUAP

    Hiatus for misbehaving.

  • Banned
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 458 posts

Posted 20 December 2019 - 11:42 AM

https://www.google.c...131.3gFJ4XxWGIA

#7 OverUnityDeviceUAP

OverUnityDeviceUAP

    Hiatus for misbehaving.

  • Banned
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 458 posts

Posted 20 December 2019 - 11:43 AM

The Hubble constant since the cmb artifact is approx 3.27 c and

https://www.google.c...299.tjzgdiD0Pjg

/proofing

#8 devin553344

devin553344

    Understanding

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 334 posts

Posted 24 December 2019 - 02:09 PM

 

299,792,458 meters per second

 

I'm convinced it has to be this speed to allow a quantum/classical boundary. A Femtosecond holds the key of 0.3 micrometers. An object with this width is going to be auto-observed ..have a physical state. The speed of light is the speed it is in order for quantum events to occur. If it was any faster a Femtosecond could cover 0.2 micrometers and prevent quantum weirdness from being a thing. 

 

The speed of light is directly tied to the spaceTime and it seems to be a frame rate.

 

I suspect the default speed of light is actually 200,000,000 m/s and a multiplier of 1.49896229 is added to the frame rate to equal 299,792,458 m/s

Again, the multiplier is to ensure the quantum/classical boundary size.

 

If we take the speed of light and multiply it by 5 we get: 299,792,458 m/s x 5 = 1.49896229×10^15 Micrometers per second (1,498,962,290,000,000)
 
I think it is telling us 1,498,962,290 m/s is the speed of light when spacetime isn't involved.
 
The speed of light gets divided by 5. Is it saying time gets split between 5 different dimensions?
 
 
299,792,458 m/s x 5 = 1,498,962,290 m/s or 1,498,962,290,000,000 Micrometers per second
1,498,962,290,000,000 / 5 = 2.9979246e+14 || 299,792,460,000,000
 
I think this is saying the auto-observe key is actually 0.29979246 Micrometers

 

speed of light 299,792,458 / auto-observe 0.29979246 micrometers to meters 0.00000029979246 = 999,999,990,000,000
 
Light has a max of auto-observing 999,999,990,000,000 clumps of matter each second.
 
 
1000000000000000 - 999999990000000 = 10,000,000
 
I think that is somewhere around 1.00000001% of a difference.

 

The speed of light is an arbitrary composition of meters and seconds. It means nothing in relation to the value 200,000,000.


Edited by devin553344, 24 December 2019 - 02:11 PM.


#9 pittsburghjoe

pittsburghjoe

    Understanding

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 433 posts

Posted 25 December 2019 - 04:53 PM

Space and Time are directly tied. Or should I say Distance and Time? The frame rate of spacetime has been increased for light to be the speed it is.

If I'm right, the quantum/classical boundary should be different throughout the fabric of spacetime ..like time dilation.

Time dilation and the boundary must be insane in cosmic voids. This has to by why they are expanding.

Spacetime converts quantum waves that have a width of 0.3 or larger and automatically gives them a physical state. The wave is now also a particle, it is in a duality ..the quantum field and spacetime are influencing it. It isn't going to perform quantum weirdness events but will wobble like a wave. Observation can be performed on purpose with smaller objects ..what I care about are the auto-observed sizes.

Matter waves not decaying is pretty strong evidence that spacetime isn't involved with unobserved quantum waves.

Side thought: I don't think the quantum field has a causality limit for unobserved quantum waves.

The reason Einstein failed at a unifying theory is because he refused to believe anything could be without spacetime.
I think spacetime is available everywhere ..but is not enacted everywhere. I think Mass enacts it (the boundary).

If you toss a rock into a cosmic void, spacetime will form around its mass like a bubble. It will experience the maximum time dilation and quantum/classical boundary spacetime can handle. Because of the spacetime bubble size. If the rock is around the size of the new boundary (for its new bubble) it would disappear into quantum waves and so would the spacetime bubble (assuming the rock didn't have a physical state at the time).

Is this why we are seeing stars older than time? Are the stars in question living in cosmic voids?
Anything that ages, has a physical state.

lorentz doesn't apply to quantum waves without a physical state ..there is nothing to tradeoff.

 

If galaxies are these enacted spacetime bubbles ..do we need dark matter to be a thing anymore?

 

The stars we see moving so fast at the edges of galaxies is due to its own spacetime bubble is mostly sticking out of the galaxy bubble. That star is moving in space with extreme time dilation.

 

We should be asking ourselves how much mass = how much spacetime?

 

I wouldn't want to be the first person to leave the galaxy. You would age and the different scale of the quantum/classical boundary would probably do something awful to your body.

 

Spacetime that isn't enacted would be like a deflated balloon ..lifeless. I'm asking what size the bubble gets per 0.3 micrometer of mass. Is the galaxy a giant spacetime bubble ..or more like a tent city?

 

We can compare galaxies with slow edge stars to ones with fast to give us a clue to the size. 

 

This thread contains all the ingredients to formulate a TOE.
 
 
The speed of light (causality) is the frame rate of spacetime. The frame rate determines the quantum/classical boundary.
 
Quantum weirdness events will not occur if the 0.3 micrometer object (not even touching a 30+ micrometer object) can be completely observed in a single frame. The exception being, 30 micrometer objects are allowed to interact without causing decoherence to a 0.2 micrometer object.
 
Unobserved QM = Quantum Field
 
Duality = QFT (both spacetime and the quantum field) (no quantum weirdness except for wobble ..and the quantum Zeno effect, the quantum field is still making it ageless. )
 
Spacetime = GR


#10 OverUnityDeviceUAP

OverUnityDeviceUAP

    Hiatus for misbehaving.

  • Banned
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 458 posts

Posted 25 December 2019 - 06:09 PM

Or should I say Distance and Time?

Distance and change.

#11 Mutex

Mutex

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 51 posts

Posted 04 January 2020 - 05:44 PM

The actual number that is the speed of light is simply a function of the definition of the unit of length of space and the definition of the unit of the length of time. 

 

If the length of 1 meter was in fact 299792458 meters then the speed of light would be 1.

 

So the reason why it is so high is we use a very small unit of length (the meter) and a very long unit of time (1 second). 

 

What is more interesting is that in any reference frame or anywhere, is that the speed is constant, that means even though the length of 1 second can be different in different places (general and special relativity), the speed of light is still the same. That means that not only does the length of time change relative to another place, but also the length of space.

 

If you are on top of everest and have shorter time (GR time dilation), and you measure the speed of light to be constant, then the length of 1 meter must also be shorter by an equal amount. 

 

length of space/length of time = 1


  • pittsburghjoe likes this

#12 pittsburghjoe

pittsburghjoe

    Understanding

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 433 posts

Posted 04 January 2020 - 06:08 PM

Mutex, I gotta say, I love that.


  • Mutex likes this



Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: quantum, lightspeed