Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Both Newton & Einstein Are Wrong.

Newton Einstein dark matter dark energy relativity mahesh khati www.maheshkhati.com

  • Please log in to reply
29 replies to this topic

#1 maheshkhati

maheshkhati

    Questioning

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 129 posts

Posted 19 December 2019 - 05:17 AM

This paper proves that Inertial frame of reference concept of Newton is wrong because that gives different
result of same event & require some modification(chapter 1) &

Einstein Special theory of relativity is also wrong because when object & observer move in different directions
then relative mathematics gives some wrong results as applied force is different than acting force
& direction of acceleration & force are different (chapter 1).

I have proposed that space is different than vacuum & create a frame of reference. This solve the problem of
dark energy (accelerated expansion of world) & dark matter. (chapter 2 & 3)

I proposed that whole world is made up of two anti particles which both carries all the fields. (chapter 5)
Paper:-

http://vixra.org/abs/1912.0171

This world is simple.

#2 OverUnityDeviceUAP

OverUnityDeviceUAP

    Hiatus for misbehaving.

  • Banned
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 458 posts

Posted 19 December 2019 - 07:49 AM

I'm 90 percent sure Newton figured it out at an earlier age than did Einstein.

#3 devin553344

devin553344

    Understanding

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 334 posts

Posted 19 December 2019 - 08:46 AM

Newton and Einstein were both genius. As was Planck, Maxwell, etc. We've built a world of technology based on all their ideas. Now how do you think we would have achieved all this if they were wrong? Yes I have an cell phone which actually works ;)

 

P.S. I believe you're required to keep your theory local to this server. And post your proof in this thread.


Edited by devin553344, 19 December 2019 - 08:50 AM.


#4 OverUnityDeviceUAP

OverUnityDeviceUAP

    Hiatus for misbehaving.

  • Banned
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 458 posts

Posted 19 December 2019 - 10:26 AM

No Einstein might have figured finished the race before Newton but Wjs beat both of them.

#5 OverUnityDeviceUAP

OverUnityDeviceUAP

    Hiatus for misbehaving.

  • Banned
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 458 posts

Posted 19 December 2019 - 10:39 AM

William James Sidis is the second smartest individual consciousness to have ever existed. Which is pretty ****in impressivebif you ask me but his parents really had to ****ing torture the **** out of him for him to go kwisatz haderach by age 33

#6 OverUnityDeviceUAP

OverUnityDeviceUAP

    Hiatus for misbehaving.

  • Banned
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 458 posts

Posted 19 December 2019 - 10:40 AM

Age 46*

#7 devin553344

devin553344

    Understanding

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 334 posts

Posted 19 December 2019 - 11:44 AM

William James Sidis is the second smartest individual consciousness to have ever existed. Which is pretty ****in impressivebif you ask me but his parents really had to ****ing torture the **** out of him for him to go kwisatz haderach by age 33

 

I'm not sure what his contribution to physics was?



#8 OverUnityDeviceUAP

OverUnityDeviceUAP

    Hiatus for misbehaving.

  • Banned
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 458 posts

Posted 19 December 2019 - 12:00 PM

I'm not sure what his contribution to physics was?

None of the disappeared ones were affiliated with the scientific community post-enlightenment, not Newton, not Einstein, not Khufu. In fact the scientific community didnt even exist in the time of the pharoah's, obviously.

#9 OverUnityDeviceUAP

OverUnityDeviceUAP

    Hiatus for misbehaving.

  • Banned
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 458 posts

Posted 19 December 2019 - 12:01 PM

I actually dont think khufu rediscovered a goddamn thing that information was shared back then

#10 OverUnityDeviceUAP

OverUnityDeviceUAP

    Hiatus for misbehaving.

  • Banned
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 458 posts

Posted 19 December 2019 - 01:05 PM

https://www.sidis.net › animatePDF
Web results
THE ANIMATE AND THE INANIMATE

#11 OverUnityDeviceUAP

OverUnityDeviceUAP

    Hiatus for misbehaving.

  • Banned
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 458 posts

Posted 19 December 2019 - 01:06 PM

That is good superfluous text to my work. But there's **** regarding viewing spheres from different angles and how to graph them holy grail esque that I haven't even shared yet.

I'm waiting for Sarah butler to get her proverbial *** to my apartment for some saki

#12 VictorMedvil

VictorMedvil

    The Human Shadow

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2474 posts

Posted 19 December 2019 - 04:49 PM

Do you go on psychotic rages much?


Edited by VictorMedvil, 19 December 2019 - 04:52 PM.


#13 OverUnityDeviceUAP

OverUnityDeviceUAP

    Hiatus for misbehaving.

  • Banned
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 458 posts

Posted 19 December 2019 - 08:42 PM

Do you go on psychotic rages much?

Wow that came way out of left field I fail to see what that has to do with the line of discussion and quite frankly I haven't seen much from you or anyone else on this site since CraigD "left"

#14 maheshkhati

maheshkhati

    Questioning

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 129 posts

Posted 26 December 2019 - 03:18 AM

This paper shows that vacuum & space are different. Physics is applied for the motion in side the space not in vacuum.
This is the reason for sudden un explain expansion of world after big bang & accelerated expansion of the world because
physics is not get applied for edge galaxies moving toward vacuum of the outer world.
This is true for simple newtonian physics also. Two inertial frame will not record the same energy consumption
of same event as explain in chapter 1. This also require inertial space frame concept to record true consumption of energy of the event.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Special theory of relativity is also wrong because that will create mathematical additional non applied force
I explain it in simple way,
Consider one military plain dropped the Bomb A from some height on earth with horizontal velocity ux
then Bomb will accelerate in vertical direction due gravitational force & move horizontally with constant
velocity ux
Now, for observer on ground force applied on Bomb A is gravity but
Spe relativity create one mathematical additional horizontal force
fx= y3 mo. (ux/c^2} uy ay in horizontal direction which not applied by anyone in this frame.
(Explain in chapter 1)
This will create a situation where applied force on object is different than acting force.
This is wrong physics.
http://vixra.org/abs/1912.0171

Edited by maheshkhati, 26 December 2019 - 04:25 AM.


#15 maheshkhati

maheshkhati

    Questioning

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 129 posts

Posted 30 December 2019 - 03:10 AM

I explain it in simple way,
Consider one military plane dropped the Bomb A from some height on earth ground with horizontal velocity ux
then Bomb will accelerate in vertical direction due to gravitational force & move horizontally with constant
velocity ux
Now, for observer on ground, force applied on Bomb A is gravity but
Spe relativity create one mathematical additional horizontal force
fx= y3 mo. (ux/c^2} uy ay in horizontal direction which not applied by anyone in this frame.
(Explain in chapter 1)
This will create a situation where applied force on object is different than acting force.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This happen because force fx =d(Moment in x-direction)/dt = dPx/dt= y3 mo. (ux/c^2} uy ay
here, bomb is not accelerated in x-direction (horizontal) but there is change in mass due to acceleration ay = g (vertical)
Changing mass & constant horizontal velocity create horizontal force fx (rate of change of moment in horizontal direction)
This is the problem.
Details are given in chapter 1
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If this is true then we may create the situation where energy produce will be more than energy consume.
This is wrong physics.


Edited by maheshkhati, 01 January 2020 - 02:00 AM.


#16 Thoth101

Thoth101

    Explaining

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 720 posts

Posted 16 February 2020 - 02:24 AM

I wonder if anybody here knows Sir Newton was a slave runner and Einstein was a staunch socialist Zionist. Why doesn't anybody talk about Aristotle's theory's?


Edited by Thoth101, 16 February 2020 - 02:27 AM.


#17 maheshkhati

maheshkhati

    Questioning

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 129 posts

Posted 16 March 2020 - 05:52 AM

Newton was great scientist. He is completely true in local inertial frame of reference...

but Einstein's special theory of relativity is completely wrong because in that theory we can prove that applied force is different than acting force.

For example:- 

Consider one military plane dropped the Bomb A from some height on earth with horizontal constant velocity ux
then Bomb will accelerate in vertical direction due to gravitational force & move horizontally with constant
velocity ux
Now, for observer on ground, force applied on Bomb A is gravity but
Spe relativity create one mathematical additional horizontal force
fx= y3 mo. (ux/c^2} uy ay in horizontal direction which not applied by anyone in this frame.
(Explain in chapter 1)
This will create a situation where applied force on object is different than acting force.

OR energy consumed is different than energy produce.

This horizontal mathematical force Fx is created due to (constant horizontal velocity ux) X (rate of change of mass of bomb A due to vertical acceleration)

As force is the rate of change of moment in that direction.


Edited by maheshkhati, 16 March 2020 - 06:10 AM.




Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: Newton, Einstein, dark matter, dark energy, relativity, mahesh khati, www.maheshkhati.com