Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Acoustic Waves


  • Please log in to reply
22 replies to this topic

#18 ralfcis

ralfcis

    Creating

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1024 posts

Posted 27 June 2019 - 04:09 AM

So Victor, I'm confused. Are you saying a way to generally recognize experts with degrees as those who can't read with comprehension (eg. 006's last response), follow a discussion, employ critical thinking or reason, answer specific questions, have original thoughts, and only seem to irrelevantly recite what they've been taught like parrots or are you saying that diagnosis only applies to those degreed individuals on this forum? It's a rhetorical question.



#19 Dubbelosix

Dubbelosix

    Creating

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3041 posts

Posted 27 June 2019 - 03:01 PM

Oh I can follow a critical way of thinking... in fact, I only attempt to think logically. For instance, you can find a source on wiki and if you cannot find a source to back it, then that reference means nothing. The good thing about wiki, is that it is largely correct, even though a few minor contributors cannot completely know the facts of what they state, there still exists, in record, equations which are not disputed... for instance, if I looked up Schrodingers equation on wiki, it could hardly be contested. You look at a string theory record on wiki, then you are just taking in knowledge of a model, not the actual facts at hand. 



#20 ralfcis

ralfcis

    Creating

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1024 posts

Posted 27 June 2019 - 04:55 PM

Whatever you say dubblebubble. But you know who actually impressed me for the first time ever? Amp. Yes Amp actually represented Einstein's theory correctly in the are we talking relativity thread. So I'll be going head to head with him on my thread as soon as I have the time. Maybe he'll have some more tricks up his sleeve.



#21 Dubbelosix

Dubbelosix

    Creating

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3041 posts

Posted 27 June 2019 - 05:21 PM

Whatever you say dubblebubble. But you know who actually impressed me for the first time ever? Amp. Yes Amp actually represented Einstein's theory correctly in the are we talking relativity thread. So I'll be going head to head with him on my thread as soon as I have the time. Maybe he'll have some more tricks up his sleeve.

 

Didn't realize it was a competition, but fair to you. If that's what you want to do, be my guest.



#22 VictorMedvil

VictorMedvil

    The Human Shadow

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1536 posts

Posted 27 June 2019 - 06:48 PM

This is what I think about all this.

blhpy8.jpg


Edited by VictorMedvil, 27 June 2019 - 06:49 PM.


#23 ralfcis

ralfcis

    Creating

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1024 posts

Posted 27 June 2019 - 07:53 PM

The word there is "crack" but I think you read it as "crank". Thanks for illustrating my point. In case you can't follow what I'm saying, my point is the lack of reading comprehension on this forum.