For several years I have been developing the idea of the relationship of the micro- and the macroworld with fundamental physical constants. As a result, I got some interesting formulas that seem to confirm this idea. The first formula calculates the average radius of the Earth:

The second formula calculates the average distance (not **AU**!) from the Earth to the Sun:

The third formula calculates the highest-intensity harmonic of the Schumann resonance:

where * µ* is the Earth's gravitational parameter (the geocentric gravitational constant),

*is the electron rest mass,*

**m**_{e}*is the reduced Planck constant,*

**ħ***is the Planck constant,*

**h***is the speed of light in vacuum,*

**c***is the Rydberg constant (in Hz),*

**R**_{c}*≈ 1/137.04 is the fine-structure constant,*

**α***= 1 m/s is a matching coefficient.*

**C**

(I also have other formulas using gravitational parameters that I have not yet published.)

I have already discussed the first two formulas in other forums. I was told that these formulas are a coincidence. Now, considering the third formula I got (about 7.85 Hz), it would be interesting for me to hear opinions of other researchers - Is it really just three formulas that give the correct results can be a coincidence? Maybe we just do not understand that the reality of different planets depends on their gravitational parameters and may be various? Maybe the information about the Universe, which we obtain with our senses and instruments, is an illusion that requires correction?

Thanks for your opinion.

**Edited by Hamster, 23 April 2019 - 04:59 AM.**