Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Particle Physics


  • Please log in to reply
26 replies to this topic

#18 alright1234

alright1234

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 49 posts

Posted 20 March 2019 - 12:50 PM

Exch----After the exp. holes are formed in the gold foil which invalidate the exp.



#19 exchemist

exchemist

    Creating

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2827 posts

Posted 20 March 2019 - 04:02 PM

Exch----After the exp. holes are formed in the gold foil which invalidate the exp.

Then we have nothing to discuss. 



#20 VictorMedvil

VictorMedvil

    The Human Shadow

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1562 posts

Posted 20 March 2019 - 05:25 PM

Exch----After the exp. holes are formed in the gold foil which invalidate the exp.

 

Are you downs syndrome, No holes form in the material it is Alpha Particle radiation you should really learn something about science before coming to a science forum and saying things like that. It makes you sound very uneducated.


Edited by VictorMedvil, 20 March 2019 - 05:28 PM.


#21 GAHD

GAHD

    Eldritch Horror

  • Administrators
  • 2712 posts

Posted 20 March 2019 - 08:55 PM

Are you downs syndrome, No holes form in the material it is Alpha Particle radiation you should really learn something about science before coming to a science forum and saying things like that. It makes you sound very uneducated.

The worrying thing is it appears to be a university/college student according to my ESP. REALLY hoping it's not a lecturer but I can't discount that considering the third party reviews I checked about the institute.

There's a reason I pointed them to a Dimensional Analysis course when they were obviously trying to cram tab A into slot B.



#22 alright1234

alright1234

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 49 posts

Posted 21 March 2019 - 01:43 PM

No, my good and beloved friend, I on the contrary have up syndrome.

 

 

If you take an electron beam of an arc weld and use a gold foil as a anode (ground), HOLES will be formed in the gold foil. Protons and beta particles have a mass 1,000 times larger than an electron which would result in holes forming in the Rutherford gold foil which nullifies Rutherford's exp. Also, Rutherford experiment does not work using a .25 inch thick gold plate. Theoretical experimental Physics is often if not always fictional. For example the LIGO, Wilson cloud chamber, Ptolemy model and big bang, just to mention a few.

 

 

"cram tab A into slot B." sound like the atomic orbitals and the SCC (spherical coordinate system).


Edited by alright1234, 21 March 2019 - 02:21 PM.


#23 VictorMedvil

VictorMedvil

    The Human Shadow

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1562 posts

Posted 21 March 2019 - 04:58 PM

No, my good and beloved friend, I on the contrary have up syndrome.

 

 

If you take an electron beam of an arc weld and use a gold foil as a anode (ground), HOLES will be formed in the gold foil. Protons and beta particles have a mass 1,000 times larger than an electron which would result in holes forming in the Rutherford gold foil which nullifies Rutherford's exp. Also, Rutherford experiment does not work using a .25 inch thick gold plate. Theoretical experimental Physics is often if not always fictional. For example the LIGO, Wilson cloud chamber, Ptolemy model and big bang, just to mention a few.

 

 

"cram tab A into slot B." sound like the atomic orbitals and the SCC (spherical coordinate system).

 

 

See this is how I know you have no idea what you are talking about "Beta Particles having a mass having a mass 1,000 times the mass of an electron".


  • exchemist likes this

#24 alright1234

alright1234

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 49 posts

Posted 22 March 2019 - 03:04 PM

alpha p



#25 alright1234

alright1234

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 49 posts

Posted 26 March 2019 - 01:39 PM

"Ahh now that is a neat question. QGP would in theory be an originator of protons, though β neutron decay is another method of "origin."

 

 

The QGP is part of the detector not the source.



#26 GAHD

GAHD

    Eldritch Horror

  • Administrators
  • 2712 posts

Posted 28 March 2019 - 01:40 PM

"Ahh now that is a neat question. QGP would in theory be an originator of protons, though β neutron decay is another method of "origin."

 

 

The QGP is part of the detector not the source.

Since you're obviously not reading and posting nonsense. Have a 7 day vacation for trolling. :) Behave better when you return.


  • exchemist likes this

#27 MikeBrace

MikeBrace

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 41 posts

Posted 14 May 2019 - 11:08 AM

How do you exp. justify the existence of a proton?

 

I think you can create a proton and an electron strictly though mechanical means. I know you can magnetize and demagnetize ferrous metal by introducing the ferrous metal to a magnetic field though mechanical means, such as immediate contact (rub a magnet on a screw driver) or simply imparting kinetic energy (striking it hard with a hammer) to the metal in a magnetic field. I speculate that it you impact a neutron hard enough to break it apart, and you do so in a highly-magnetized field, you will spit out a proton and a neutron. And if they attempt to get back together through mutual attraction, but miss on trajectory you get an hydrogen atom. If they collide you get your neutron back.