Dubbelosix Posted February 6, 2019 Author Report Share Posted February 6, 2019 The strange prediction out of my equations was the fact that the kinetic energy was [equal?] to a rest energy through a Lorentz transformation... of course, this may not seem strange to you guys as you will also pick up on the key words ''through a transformation'' but see an implicite value means I can theoretically plug in the values to see when the classical upper limit of kinetic energy can be deduced. At the value given, the Lorentz factor would be equal to 2.000 (two point, zero zero zero), with an inverse of 0.500 but with the beta ratio at 0.866, so it is at this value of transformation, a rest energy can then be considered a kinetic energy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dubbelosix Posted February 6, 2019 Author Report Share Posted February 6, 2019 I ask for people to check, because it is possible I got the wrong calculation out of that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.