Warp Field Structure And Warp Drive

[Vmedvil]

First, we will start off with a basic structure of a Warp Field described  by the Alcubierre Metric and see what it would actually require to exist, which is given by this Invariant Solution to Einstein's Field Equation in Special Relativity.

 

 

ds² =  -V_s² f²[r_s] dt²  -dt² + dy² + dz² + dx²  =  - V_s² f[r_s] dt²  - dt² + (d²/∇²)

 

 

Which says that the Space in front of the ship or object must contract space while the Space Behind the Ship must Expand space to generate the Warp Field. The Negative Terms Contract, the Positive expand Space, which the first term will be opposite the normal Metric due to Dark Energy being solved through V_s as V_Λ

 

 

Given the Terms of this equation next we need to find the sources that will expand and contract space, We know that Dark Energy expands the Universe which also implies space while gravity function of Normal Energy-Mass contracts space. 

 

 

So, given the Idea that we know the terms of expansion and contraction, we can now generate a Warp Field with Dark Energy and Energy-mass, if we want to use them to generate it.

 

 

 

ds² =  -V_s² f²[r_s] dt²  - dt² + (d²/∇²)

 

Transform for Energy-mass and Dark Energy Warp Field.

 

ds² =  VΛ² f²[r_s] dt²  - dt² + (d²/∇²) , ∇^{2 =}  (iħ(d/dt)ψ[r,t] - V[r,t]ψ[r,t])/((ħ²/2M)ψ[r,t]) , VΛ^{2 =}  H²d(Kiloparsec)²

 

 

After Quantum mechanics Energy-Mass and Dark Energy Transform it becomes. 

 

ds² =   H²d(Kiloparsec)² f²[r_s] dt²  - dt² + (d²/(iħ(d/dt)ψ[r,t] - V[r,t]ψ[r,t])/((ħ²/2M)ψ[r,t]))

 

Next we need to transform this to take account for the velocity of the ship on the time component through space, which will require Special Relativity for Time Dilation and Mass Increase due to movement. 

 

ds² =  H²d(Kiloparsec)² f²[r_s] dt'²  - dt'² + (d²/(iħ(d/dt)ψ[r,t] - V[r,t]ψ[r,t])/((ħ²/2M)ψ[r,t]))

 

 

dt' = (dt/(1-(V_o²/C²))^1/2) , M = (M_o/(1-(V_o²/C²))^1/2)

 

Transform to include Velocity of the object through space. 

 

ds² =  H²d(Kiloparsec)² f²[r_s] (dt/(1-(V_o²/C²))^1/2)²  - (dt/(1-(V_o²/C²))^1/2)² + (d²/(iħ(d/dt)ψ[r,t] - V[r,t]ψ[r,t])/((ħ²/2(M_o/(1-(V_o²/C²))^1/2))ψ[r,t]))

 

Which now gives the Energy-mass / Dark Energy Warp Field Equation, Dark Energy must be behind the ship in high densities while  Energy-mass in front of the ship in high densities to Contract it, given by the Hubble's Constant H and the Quantum Field for Energy-mass, which should allow for things to break the Light Barrier. Though, I have no idea how to concentrate Dark Energy into one location, but Energy-mass is easy to do.

 

 

 

 

 

Edited January 5, 2018 by Vmedvil

[Super Polymath]

Yea it turns out I was incorrect regarding Fermi's paradox according to my very own theory, where all this comes from, a craft need only be composed of more positively charged atoms in the rear & more negatively charged in the front to have warp capabilities although designing those atoms may be tricky. But warp would be the quickest for delivering your von neumann probes, even quicker than guided evolution via information panspermia. 

Edited January 5, 2018 by Super Polymath

[Vmedvil]

Yea it turns out I was incorrect regarding Fermi's paradox according to my very own theory, where all this comes from, a craft need only be composed of more positively charged atoms in the rear & more negatively charged in the front to have warp capabilities although designing those atoms may be tricky. But warp would be the quickest for delivering your von neumann probes, even quicker than guided evolution via information panspermia. 

 

The electromagnetic Energy-Stress Tensor disagrees with that, but believe what you want, whether negative or positive charges still have a positive Energy stress.

 

 

Edited January 5, 2018 by Vmedvil

[Super Polymath]

The electromagnetic Energy-Stress Tensor disagrees with that, but believe what you want, whether negative or positive charges still have a positive Energy stress.

 

 

So warp isn't possible & my thesis regarding Fermi's paradox is correct...

[Vmedvil]

So warp isn't possible & my thesis regarding Fermi's paradox is correct...

 

No, Dark Energy is used to expand, Charge still generates normal energy-mass which contracts space.

Edited January 5, 2018 by Vmedvil

[Super Polymath]

No, Dark Energy is used to expand, Charge still generates normal energy-mass which contracts space.

No, positive frees space. That's where the micro black hole is most of its life. That is the only DE we can tap into. The virtual proton micro-BH will have a brief negative charge, if you can have those spawn more frequently in the front of the craft, & somehow more regularity regarding positive charge in the rear

 

this is all the wormhole metric that you stole from my imagination you know, the entire op equation

Edited January 5, 2018 by Super Polymath

[Vmedvil]

So warp isn't possible & my thesis regarding Fermi's paradox is correct...

Oh, I see what happened that was a typo, it was supposed to be but not by.

[Vmedvil]

No, positive frees space. That's where the micro black hole is most of its life. That is the only DE we can tap into. The virtual proton micro-BH will have a brief negative charge, if you can have those spawn more frequently in the front of the craft, & somehow more regularity regarding positive charge in the rear

 

this is all the wormhole metric that you stole from my imagination you know, the entire op equation

 

Um, no, this is my equation in thousands of different forms your idea was only used as one solution to it.

[Super Polymath]

The bright center of our galaxy will continue to grow, the spiral arms will dissolve. One day all that will be left is a shrinking BH. Where does all the material that is our galaxy go? It becomes apart of a hot sphere somewhere, when those BH's shrink enough that sphere will expand into a CMB

 

[Vmedvil2]

This needs to be tested, however I don't think it will be long until it is, link = https://www.sciencealert.com/scientists-are-starting-to-take-warp-drives-seriously-especially-this-one-concept

[Arcturus]

I totally convinced of this one. If you compress space it would then be denser and thus harder to travel through, irrelevant?

[Vmedvil2]

I totally convinced of this one. If you compress space it would then be denser and thus harder to travel through, irrelevant?

You compress space in front of the ship and contract it in behind of the ship in the direction of movement, something like that but not exactly as you compress space the points of space get closer together versus contracting it would make the points of space further apart causing movement that is not obtained from the kinetic energy of the object.

Edited April 8, 2020 by VictorMedvil