Jump to content
Science Forums

Non Merger Evidence Of Galaxy Formation


xps13579

Recommended Posts

According to the report from the natural mother web site, making use of NASA wide infrared survey camera (WISE) observation data researchers detected a mysterious x - type structure in the Milky Way Galaxy recently.Fig. http://bbs.tianya.cn/post-666-42403-1.shtml

 

 

The X structure is made up of stars running in the center of the Milky way, the X structure is perpendicular to the plane of the galaxy, radially distributed. Such Bulges exist commonly in disk galaxies similar to the Milky way, these are some stars running along a box like orbit in the central region of the galaxy. Seen from From the earth, the orbital plane is similar to a X shape.

 

This is a profound discovery that will help to inspire scientists to study how the Milky way was formed. Melissa Ness, research leader, said that in WISE images, they can see a box - like orbit with an internal x structure, which confirms that the internal formation process, namely internal factor, drives the projection structure and the study shows that the Milky way is relatively calm, and there has been no major merger since the formation of the X structure, and if the galaxy interacts with other galaxies, it will destroy the X structure.

 

 

In other words, this x structure can indicate the purity of the universe, and if the galaxy collides with another galaxy, it will not form such a perfect x structure. At the same time, if the Milky Way orbits the orbit of another galaxy, the X structure is bound to be destroyed. It also suggests that galaxies are not from merging, because such X type structures do not exist in the merged galaxies

By studying such bulge structures within the galaxy, researchers can study and analyze how galaxies are formed more easily, and Melissa Ness said that The bulge structure of X - type is an important feature of galaxy formation. If we analyze the structure in depth, we will have a better understanding of how the galaxy formed.

 

 

In fact, the vortex structure of any two spiral galaxy will collide with the destruction, not to mention the X type structure. The elliptical galaxies are likely to get smaller but not bigger after merger, because the central mass is increased, the gravity increases as well, peripheral to shrink.

 

 

Step back and say, if the galaxy will collide and merge, is never limited to the two galaxies collide, there will be multiple galaxies collide in a variety of ways, therefore, the universe can appear all sorts of strange galaxies, there is no regularity at all, but in fact there are only several sorts of galaxies, irregular galaxies are only 5/100, equivalent to several disabled people.That is to say, the regularity of galaxy formation decides galaxies form or evolve without merger.

 

 

So far, no one has really seen galaxies merging, so-call merger of galaxies is just a guess. The following figure ( http://bbs.tianya.cn/post-666-42391-1.shtml ) which was used to prove two galaxies merging doesn’t stand really for two galaxies merging, obviously the galaxy of the left is far brighter than the right and therefore their distances to the earth are quite different though they look closed, they actually are departing from one another all the same following Hubble law

 

 

So how did galaxies actually form? I've made it clear in another post, galaxies form from growing gradually and very small at beginning, perhaps originated from a quantum fluctuation, with the expansion of space and time, galaxies have been growing and new matter has continuously been creating inside galaxies. The appearance of this new material can be regarded as the conversion of the work done by the force of the expansion of space and time, but not the absorption of what is in existence. The increase of mass of a galaxy meets the first law of thermodynamics dm+Pdv=0, here pressure P can be proved to be the negative value of density of the galaxy, see the paper "Modification of Field Equation and Return of Continuous Creation----- Galaxies Form from Gradual Growth Instead of Gather of Existent Matter" Download | Page No : 5-32

Edited by xps13579
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I agree with the evidence at hand, I do not generally agree with your conclusions. Also, what does this statement mean?

 

 

''The increase of mass of a galaxy meets the first law of thermodynamics dm+PdV=0''

 

 

You say the increase of mass meets the first law, which you state as [math]dm + PdV = 0[/math].... for this equation to be zero, there is a conservation going on here. For a system that is continuously creating matter, you want solutions which satisfy

 

[math]dm + PdV \ne 0[/math]

 

To which, many solutions actually exist. Secondly, I am so blind if people are using incomplete units. You have a pressure term multiplied by a volume as you would expect in the thermodynamic equation. I think you might pick up that differential mass term from the differential energy?

 

[math]dU = TdS + PdV[/math]

 

[math]c = 1[/math]

 

[math]\rightarrow dm = TdS + PdV = 0[/math]

 

Where S the entropy has units of Boltzmann constant. So for units to work, P must be similar to an energy density.

 

don't treat a phenomenon in isolation, the author is systematically recommending a powerful theory of gravity that will replace the big bang,in addition to explaining the usual physical phenomena from sky to earth, it also explains the newly observed physical phenomena, such as the expansion of the earth, the increasing distance between the earth and the sun, the excessive shift of the moon after considering the tides, the changes of the length of the day, the earthquake, etc. accepting continuous creation of theory of uniformity but not the instantaneous creation of the big bang, set up realistic cosmology,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I agree with the evidence at hand, I do not generally agree with your conclusions. Also, what does this statement mean?

 

 

''The increase of mass of a galaxy meets the first law of thermodynamics dm+PdV=0''

 

 

You say the increase of mass meets the first law, which you state as [math]dm + PdV = 0[/math].... for this equation to be zero, there is a conservation going on here. For a system that is continuously creating matter, you want solutions which satisfy

 

 

[math]dm + PdV \ne 0[/math]

 

To which, many solutions actually exist. Secondly, I am so blind if people are using incomplete units. You have a pressure term multiplied by a volume as you would expect in the thermodynamic equation. I think you might pick up that differential mass term from the differential energy?

 

 

[math]dU = TdS + PdV[/math]

 

[math]c = 1[/math]

 

[math]\rightarrow dm = TdS + PdV = 0[/math]

 

Where S the entropy has units of Boltzmann constant. So for units to work, P must be similar to an energy density.

 

Because there is no heat transfer between galaxies, so Tds= dQ=0, and a systematic explanation of the origin of this formula dm+Pdv=0 is presented in this paper "Modification of Field Equation and Return of Continuous Creation----- Galaxies Form from Gradual Growth Instead of Gather of Existent Matter" Download | Page No : 5-32, please see the paper seriously

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...