To Deny The Big Bang Must Accept The Continuous Creation Of Matter

[xps13579]

        To deny the Big Bang must accept the continuous creation of matter

 

  Hubble discovered that the universe was expanding, that is, galaxies were spreading, People naturally think that if the mass in the universe of matter is unchanged, then with time pushed backward, the density of the material in the universe is certainly greater and greater, a singular state of infinite density and infinite temperature is inevitable, this is the source of big bang.

 

But if galaxies are thought to disperse with their mass increasing and the rate of increase of their mass ensures that the average density of the universe remains unchanged,then pushing the clock backwards again such singular state exists no longer.  

It can be said that it is the absolutization of the law of conservation of mass that leads to the inevitability of the big bang.

 

Modern observations no doubt indicate that the universe is indeed expanding，therefore, it is impossible to deny the big bang from denying the expansion of the universe, we must start with denying the absolutization of conservation of mass, i.e., admitting the slow creation of matter in galaxies or galaxies are growing up with cosmic expansion. The rapid creation of matter does not accord with common sense, but slow creation, such as mass of celestial bodies increases by one of 10 billion, does not violate observations and should be accepted. Advocates of the big bang theory neither accept the continuous creation nor recognize the instantaneous creation of matter, they describe the instantaneous creation of the big bang as a singular point to obscure and avoid the creation of matter, do not mistake advocates of the big bang to support the creation of matter; they are also opposed to the creation of matter.

 

Recognizing the continuous, slow creation of matter, not random creation, is the expression of respect for the law of conservation of mass,and not only are we opposed to the absolutization of laws of physics but also against extreme relativism to physical laws.

 

In short, do not accept the continuous creation of matter, trying to reinvent the wheel to establish a new theory is impossible to tear down the big bang cosmology, at most coexist.　

Edited July 4, 2017 by xps13579

[OceanBreeze]

    To deny the Big Bang must accept the continuous creation of matter

  

 

One very good reason NOT to deny the Big Bang.

[OceanBreeze]

The continuous creation of matter is a claim for the steady state theory, not the Big Bang theory.

[OceanBreeze]

The initial conditions states that energy and matter was already present. Big bang expands and distributes the matter and energy while space grows inbetween galaxies. Steady state was all about using a C-field to explain how matter and energy was created between galaxies as they separated.

 

Then we agree on that; the BBT is not a claim for something coming from nothing, except in the eyes of creationists. There was either a singularity of infinite density or there was a source of enormous (not infinite) energy for the BB to happen. But that is not what the OP is saying.

[xps13579]

''In short, do not accept the continuous creation of matter, trying to reinvent the wheel to establish a new theory is impossible to tear down the big bang cosmology, at most coexist.''

 

 

Oh but I do! I just don't believe its being created between galaxies as they separate.

 

When spacetime expanded there is nothing to suggest against the idea there was a gradual release of matter and energy into spacetime. It doesn't need to be an event still happening today either. As a universe expands, and releases energy and matter periodically, you can imagine a smooth distribution of systems.

the expansion of space-time is for the growth of galaxies，space-time and matter are one thing, space-time and matter create in the same time, the expansion of space-time implies itself creating with the density of universe unchanged.