Jump to content
Science Forums

Spectacles


petrushkagoogol

Recommended Posts

Do spectacles decrease the perceived value of a woman, although the reality may be different?

How would you propose quantifying “the perceived value of a woman”? What experiment would you then design to test the hypothesis “spectacles decrease the perceived value of a woman”?

 

For an example of a casual experiment along similar lines, you might look to MythBusters episode 220. This episode had an experiment to find if men were more strongly attracted to women with blonde hair (the “gentlemen prefer blondes” myth), by having the male test subjects rate the same women wearing high-quality blonde, brunette, and red haired wigs on attractiveness, likability, and whether they would date them again. They found no significant difference associated with hair color.

 

As you’d imagine with such an obvious question, the effect of eyeglasses on perceived personal qualities has been studied. The first I came across online was "The glasses stereotype revisited: Effects of eyeglasses on perception, recognition, and impression of faces." Helmut Leder, Michael Forster; Gernot Gerger (2011). A summary of its result can be read free at this lifehack.org page.

 

Interestingly, the study, which distinguished between rimless and full-framed eyeglasses, found that people without eyeglasses are perceived as more attractive and likable, but people with eyeglasses are perceived as successful and intelligent. People with rimless glasses were perceived as more trustworthy than either people without glasses or people with full-framed ones.

 

So the “value” ascribed to a woman, or a man, might depend on how the perceiver values attractiveness vs. intelligence vs. trustworthiness.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How would you propose quantifying “the perceived value of a woman”? What experiment would you then design to test the hypothesis “spectacles decrease the perceived value of a woman”?

 

For an example of a casual experiment along similar lines, you might look to MythBusters episode 220. This episode had an experiment to find if men were more strongly attracted to women with blonde hair (the “gentlemen prefer blondes” myth), by having the male test subjects rate the same women wearing high-quality blonde, brunette, and red haired wigs on attractiveness, likability, and whether they would date them again. They found no significant difference associated with hair color.

 

As you’d imagine with such an obvious question, the effect of eyeglasses on perceived personal qualities has been studied. The first I came across online was "The glasses stereotype revisited: Effects of eyeglasses on perception, recognition, and impression of faces." Helmut Leder, Michael Forster; Gernot Gerger (2011). A summary of its result can be read free at this lifehack.org page.

 

Interestingly, the study, which distinguished between rimless and full-framed eyeglasses, found that people without eyeglasses are perceived as more attractive and likable, but people with eyeglasses are perceived as successful and intelligent. People with rimless glasses were perceived as more trustworthy than either people without glasses or people with full-framed ones.

 

So the “value” ascribed to a woman, or a man, might depend on how the perceiver values attractiveness vs. intelligence vs. trustworthiness.

 

I think spectacles lead to an inferiority complex of sorts as lack of visual acuity gives rise to restriction in perceptual mobility, if you see what I mean....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think spectacles lead to an inferiority complex of sorts as lack of visual acuity gives rise to restriction in perceptual mobility, if you see what I mean....

I've needed spectacles since the age of 14 and they never caused me to feel inferior, but then again everyone in my family needed corrective lenses.  I am inclined to think feelings of inferiority are caused more by personal experiences.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From the point of view of finding a mate.

Considering the low physiological cost of becoming a father compared to the physiological cost of becoming a mother, a male need not concern himself with any perceived imperfections in the female, he just needs to find one that is willing and able to bear offspring. 

 

 

Beauty and the geek, anyone ? :-)

Possession of one set of traits need not negate the existence of the other.  My sisters were able to marry and have children in spite of imperfect vision, as was my wife.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...