Jump to content
Science Forums

Mental Health Industry


Elisa

Recommended Posts

I was reading an interesting article on the mental health industry and how we seem to have an increased need to label behavior, which has increased the number of "disorders" in the DSM from roughly 22 disorders in 1917 to the current number which is almost at 700. Children as young as 4 years old have been diagnosed with being bipolar, because they exhibit unruly moods swings (temper tantrums). At what point are we overdiagnosing?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not sure this is a bad thing. For one thing when "disorders" or "diseases" get split into differently named ones, it often also accompanies a recognition that not only the cause of the thing is different, but it requires a different treatment.

 

Psychology is still in its infancy compared to medicine in general, and in the 20th century we got to our first real advances in it comparable to when medicine moved away from a single diagnosis of "imbalance of humors" with a single treatment of "bleed the patient with leeches."

 

Now, over-diagnosis *is* a problem, but I don't think that the source of it is purely the *number* of identified disorders.

 

 

The good physician treats the disease; the great physician treats the patient who has the disease, :phones:
Buffy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...
  • 1 month later...

These days moods swings is going a common trouble in human mostly in young generation, use of social networking websites and busy life has increased the stress & the daily life problems are turning into disorders. Yeas that is not a bad thing, categorization is important.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

These days moods swings is going a common trouble in human mostly in young generation, use of social networking websites and busy life has increased the stress & the daily life problems are turning into disorders. Yeas that is not a bad thing, categorization is important.

Hmmm I wouldn't say disorders can be caused by social networking sites, except for brain tumours if you use it too much, i suppose.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I'm not sure this is a bad thing. For one thing when "disorders" or "diseases" get split into differently named ones, it often also accompanies a recognition that not only the cause of the thing is different, but it requires a different treatment.

 

Psychology is still in its infancy compared to medicine in general, and in the 20th century we got to our first real advances in it comparable to when medicine moved away from a single diagnosis of "imbalance of humors" with a single treatment of "bleed the patient with leeches."

 

Now, over-diagnosis *is* a problem, but I don't think that the source of it is purely the *number* of identified disorders.

 

 

The good physician treats the disease; the great physician treats the patient who has the disease, :phones:
Buffy

 

Over-diagnosis dafuq? O.o

ah well,  tbh, i read somewhere (don't remember so can't state the source) that autism may actually be many disorders, rather than one as investigators have found that there are genes that are slightly different, and there are certain parts of the brain, not just one, that are deficient..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...