Alpha Omega Universes In Freefall

[sunshaker]

There are blackholes through out our local universe at the centre of galaxies, galaxies merge as do blackholes becoming ever larger, if we was to step outside our universe you would see we are surrounded by countless universes and universe size blackholes all pulling on each other, being pulled (falling) to Omega a "blackhole" which as feasted on many universes until it becomes to "heavy" and drops into a lower dimension and "pops" this is Alpha "whitehole" which spews all it as fed on, matter-energies-space-time which then rapidly expand in this lower dimension forming many universes in there own space-time bubbles all expanding.

We are within one of these "expanding bubbles" still falling that is why the stars and planets are weightless just like astronauts practicing weightlessness in a falling plane.

We are once again falling towards the Omega. (There are no whiteholes in any single universe as there is not enough mass to make the omega).

 

 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Coming back to our "local universe" i was wondering if the "gravity wells" around galaxies stars and planets are there because of them or are the galaxies and stars etc there because of the "gravity wells" imperfections of the expanding "universe bubble in this lower dimension" that attract the heavier elements from the higher dimension into pockets forming stars and galaxies. Perhaps something like gold on a sluice table where the heavier gold sinks into the troughs of the sluice table and lighter materials wash over.

So as our universe expands in this lower dimension it draws in lower "dimensional space" acting like the water into our universe causing "troughs in space" where the heavy old dimensional materials collect creating what we see (planets stars galaxies). And the old dimensional space (dark energies) creating a lattice, while the lower dimensional space fills the lattice. The old is the "skeleton web" of the new.

Which also then got me to thinking if all "matter and energies" came from a higher dimension we must then be higher dimensional beings living in this lower dimension which inturn means life came from the higher dimension and must then permenate dimensional space time and collect in the right "gravity wells" not to hot not to cold (earth). As it is said "what is above is below" http://www.themystica.com/mystica/articles/a/below_above.html.

 

With this "theory" i would expect there to be vortexs all over our universe where the lower dimensional space is rushing in.

There are super massive blackholes filling the galaxy bubble, There are also atom size black holes filling our solar bubble, the larger the vortex the more lower dimensional space rushes in depositing larger amounts of higher dimensional particles causing star to form but as we continue to expand the materials become more dispersed, stars form further apart , the rushing dimensional space causes the materials to swirl in these pockets,

The larger the "galaxy" or cluster of stars would mean there is a larger vortex or multiple vortexs (black holes) nearby

I also expect as our universe bubble expands the galaxy bubbles start to shrink as dimensional space is evened out through out our expanding universe, "black holes" then reverse drawing "space -energies" to other areas of our universe bubble.

 

Voyager 1 should be reaching the edge of our solar bubble, i expect it to encounter higher amounts of incoming higher dimensional energies. Recently hubble as done some more deep field imageing and i was thinking we might start seeing the edges of other "expanding universes" beginning to merge with our own.

 

Sometimes we have to step outside the box to see the bigger picture.

Edited October 9, 2012 by sunshaker

[belovelife]

i ponder this also

 

if the universe is infinate, and there are infinate universes in the multiverse,

then where do they intersect?

[Eclogite]

While stepping outside the box is a noble activity one needs to be sure one does with ones eyesight intact and solid ground underfoot else one may fall flat on ones face.

 

You state that "if we was to step outside our universe you would see we are surrounded by countless universes and universe size blackholes all pulling on each other, being pulled (falling) to Omega a "blackhole" which as feasted on many universes until it becomes to "heavy" and drops into a lower dimension and "pops" this is Alpha "whitehole" which spews all it as fed on, matter-energies-space-time which then rapidly expand in this lower dimension forming many universes in there own space-time bubbles all expanding "

 

There are ten assertions in the above statement. There is no evidence that I am aware of to support any of these assertions. So, although one might say this imaginative and is certainly outside the box, there is no justification for actually believing it. Do you have any evidence?

[sunshaker]

Before hubble done its first deep field imageing our galaxy was thought to be the extent of the universe, if you argued against that you were called a crank, those same people now call anyone a crank who things there is anything more than the Big Bang, there are many little pieces starting to fall into place, there is not yet solid "evidence" to support all what i say, take a piston from an engine by its self you would still know it is part of something bigger, I see Alpha Omega as the piston, i do see a bigger picture and how it all fits together but like you say "evidence" is key so i am reluctant to show the next stages and stick to what i think will be proved in the near future. multiuniverse of one discription or another are now creeping in to mainstream science. i know who and what i am i have a complete "picture" which like i said this is just a tiny part, i new understanding as been opened to me, it is rare that i now converse to others in written or verbal form, this is a moment for me that i know will not last much longer, something happened it as changed my life it is not now just "science", there is so much hidden in plain sight, i thought i knew the world i grew up in but i was so wrong. i have my "evidence" sometimes i wish i never but i would not go back. Science is just a "tool" we use like any other.

Edited September 28, 2012 by sunshaker

[sunshaker]

i ponder this also

 

if the universe is infinate, and there are infinate universes in the multiverse,

then where do they intersect?

When Alpha "pops" in this lower dimension forming many "universe bubbles of higher dimensional energies" each falling each expanding as lower dimensional space rushes in, to eventually all expand into each other, once again filling this lower dimension like when a handful of mud is dropped into water which dilutes throughout the water till eventually settling, this happens with the higher dimensional space it eventually settles in this lower dimension forming the Omega which once again becomes to "heavy" and once again drops through to a lower dimension forming the Alpha. By my estimates i recon we have only just started our fall from the Alpha.

The age of "our universe" is how long we have been falling.

Edited October 4, 2012 by sunshaker

[Eclogite]

Before hubble done its first deep field imageing our galaxy was thought to be the extent of the universe,

This is completely incorrect. The nature of certain nebulae was deabted in the early years of the last century. They came to be known as 'Island Universes'. Hubble comes into play as the man not the telescope in the 1920s when he assess their speed of recession. Your lack of base knowledge makes one a little nervous about takeing seriously other points you may raise in this subject area.

 

, if you argued against that you were called a crank, .

you were only called a crank if you argued without evidence.

 

those same people now call anyone a crank who things there is anything more than the Big Bang,

How strange then that many notable and respected scientists have speculated on parallel universes and on what may have preceded the Big Bang.

 

i know who and what i am i have a complete "picture" which like i said this is just a tiny part, i new understanding as been opened to me, it is rare that i now converse to others in written or verbal form, this is a moment for me that i know will not last much longer, something happened it as changed my life it is not now just "science", there is so much hidden in plain sight, i thought i knew the world i grew up in but i was so wrong. i have my "evidence" sometimes i wish i never but i would not go back. Science is just a "tool" we use like any other.

Unfortunately you are now using the language of a crank. Refusal to share data. Lack of evidence. References to things mystical. Talk of individual revelation. These are not the attributes of science. You will not get a serious listening to on a science forum when you wear the clothing of a crank.

[sunshaker]

Yes it was known in the 20s 30s but not until hubbles amazing images did we fully understand we are part of something bigger. Perhaps when you find your own understanding you will understand, I have no reason to defend what i hold true, i just thought i would share how i see part of "creation". The proof is there when you look in the right places, Alpha-Omega is how i have put the pieces together, I have a deep interest in all science, i have to understand how things work, but words do not come easily to me. To get this far is an achievment. The "evidence" is there for all i say.

[Eclogite]

Yes it was known in the 20s 30s but not until hubbles amazing images did we fully understand we are part of something bigger.

Incorrect. I have understood that was the case since before I was a teenager and that is more than fifty years ago. When you are in error and that error has been pointed out to you, the smart thing to do is to accept the correction.

 

Perhaps when you find your own understanding you will understand,

I am quite happy with my understanding, which is evidence based and is in conflict with yours.

 

i just thought i would share how i see part of "creation".

The forum is about sharing ideas, questions, information. However, when you post in anything other than the Water Cooler thread you are expected to justify any unusual claims that you make.

 

 

The proof is there when you look in the right places,

so tell us where the right places are. Clearly you have looked in them, so share that with us.

 

Alpha-Omega is how i have put the pieces together, I have a deep interest in all science, i have to understand how things work, but words do not come easily to me.

Explain again what you mean by Alpha-Omega. If your interest in science is sincere, then you know that your responses so far are unscientific.

[sunshaker]

Once you realise our universe is expanding in lower dimensional space, you realise the edges of our universe must have vortexs(blackholes)letting the lower dimensional space rush in, You realise galaxies formed when there was a higher concentration of higher dimensional materials now we have expanded somewhat, there is less concentrate of higher dimensional materials, so less to deposit in troughs, This depositing is still going on, They are known as gamma ray bursts.

And being as we are expanding these Gamma bursts would mostly be towards the edges of our universe, so would be happening mainly around the the very first stars and galaxies.

Edited October 24, 2012 by sunshaker