9/11 was an Inside Job
Posted 01 February 2008 - 01:11 PM
I know the picture was taken with a fish-eye lens but the other objects in the picture are not similarly distorted.
Also, it can be shown that a 757 would not fit behind the box in the picture that's on the top of this page.
Flight 77 3d sim test
The height of the Pentagon is 77 ft.
The Pentagon - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The length of a 757 is 155 ft.
Boeing: Commercial Airplanes - 757-200 Technical Characteristics
A 757 stood on its tail would be twice as high as the Pentagon.
In the picture we can see the tail of the plane but not the nose. The nose of the plane is behind the box. If the nose of the plane is just out of site behind the box we can see the length of the plane. If we allow for the angle and increase the size about twenty percent and stand the plane on its tail next to the Pentagon at the spot that's the same distance from the camera as the plane is, it's clear that it's not twice as tall as the Pentagon. Whatever hit the Pentagon was smaller than a 757.
These analyses are consistent with the too-small-a-plane theory.
Scholars for 9/11 Truth
Dewdney: The Missing Wings - Physics911
Posted 01 February 2008 - 01:26 PM
I strongly encourage you to look at *your* motives for insisting on seeing the most bizarre and outlandish conspiracies imaginable.
I'll leave it to Bill to respond to *your* heckling http://www.cnn.com/v....hecklers.cspan on our site:
Are you one of those it-was-an-inside-job guys? Let me tell you something…I let you be rude and interrupt me, scream at the top of your lungs. 9/11 was not an inside job; it was an Osama bin Laden job with 19 people from Saudi Arabia. They murdered 3000 Americans and others foreigners, including over 200 other Muslims. And we look like idiots, folks, denying that the people who murdered our fellow citizens did it when they are continuing to murder all around the world. So we heard from you: you go away.
O conspiracy, sham’st thou to show thy dang’rous brow by night, when evils are most free? O then, by day where wilt thou find a cavern dark enough to mask thy monstrous visage?
Posted 01 February 2008 - 01:39 PM
If you make strange claims, please provide proof or at least backup of some kind. If you fail to do so, or the backup you provide is not deemed adequate, the moderators may move your post to the Strange Claims forum.
I think I did more than back my allegation. I think I proved it to be true.
What is the definition of "Conspiracy theory" here? Is it anything that disagrees with the official version?
Posted 01 February 2008 - 01:44 PM
You will never be convinced, so all you do is aggravate everyone you meet.
Honest, there is no conspiracy to hate you. You're just naturally annoying because you make no sense and you keep babbling the same illogical arguments over and over again.
How's that workin' for ya?
Posted 01 February 2008 - 05:37 PM
This is a science website.
Conspiracy theories do not constitute science or truth. What they do constitute is mindless entertainment for bored teenagers, the seriously adled and the uneducated. We might put up with you a little longer if you try some other conspiracy, say, UFO Coverups, or faked Apollo Moon missions. But if you keep babbling bogus nonsense about 9/11, we will ban your *** with extreme prejudice.
Change subjects immediately or face the consequences.
Go watch Bigfoot videos or something
Posted 01 February 2008 - 05:48 PM
Posted 01 February 2008 - 08:20 PM
Posted 01 February 2008 - 09:42 PM
Posted 01 February 2008 - 11:05 PM
Posted 01 February 2008 - 11:42 PM
Bye Cosmored. Why is it that my best and most scathing anti-troll posts come along several hours after the troll is banned?
It was a good one.