WHY THE BIG BANG IS ERRONEOUS
The first sentence in the original post is why this kind of thread ends up in "Alternative theories" forums.
1 - the argument does not try to explain BB theory, but instead it tries to use a host of loosely connected "evidence" to discredit it
2 - it concludes that since the BB is wrong, steady state is the answer.
This is both poor science and poor logic.
Jackson, I think you should stop your outcries against the staff. Anyone who's hung around this site over the past 7 years should know that the moderators are chosen for their desire and ability to volunteer and help out, not because of their political views (or lack of), religious opinion (or lack of), scientific background (or lack of), sex (or lack of) ...